What is our modern day record when kickoff is at noon in the central time zone ?
It's definitely not good ... I've been to a few of the recent ones to tell the tale (@LSU, @Ole Miss).
What is our modern day record when kickoff is at noon in the central time zone ?
A little one sided considering the teams we play who are in the central time zone.It's definitely not good ... I've been to a few of the recent ones to tell the tale (@LSU, @Ole Miss).
MTSU received votes in the coaches poll.
How in the hell? They got blasted by Vanderbilt, barely beat LA Tech, and lost to WKU.
a 4.5 favorite per VegasInsider. I really don't get that one. But sometimes their "opening line" is not in sync with the real opening lines at many of the sports book. Back to work, boys! [winking]
Peace
Taking some points and laying down some money.a 4.5 favorite per VegasInsider. I really don't get that one. But sometimes their "opening line" is not in sync with the real opening lines at many of the sports book. Back to work, boys! [winking]
Peace
Not even remotely accurate. What is killing our computer polls is the fact we have only beaten USCjr, Missippi State, New Mexico St, and Vandy. All losing teams.Also computers use entire body of work, and their somewhat close loss to wvu in week one looks "better"" than our first two weeks. From weeks 3-now we would be ahead, but the southern miss and Florida are killing our computer polls
Not even remotely accurate. What is killing our computer polls is the fact we have only beaten USCjr, Missippi State, New Mexico St, and Vandy. All losing teams.
We will go to a bowl game and not have beaten a team with a winning record.
No doubt. Considering where we started to where we will finish, any bowl is better than no bowl. The only concern is Missouri is considered better than any team we have beatn this year, they are at home, and we play poorly on the road.Season isn't over yet...just sayin.
If it did turn out that way though I would still take it.
Not to denigrate the Cats' efforts in those wins but it should be noted that the SC, Vandy and MSU QBs are not among the top 100 passers (by QB rating) in the nation. (FWIW, I think QBR is pretty darn good measure of QB passing efficiency.) The Mizzou QB is #64 but Johnson is #76 in that metric. Overall, Mizzou is #27 in passing YPG at 284 and UK #108 at 178 YPG. As passing teams go, SC, Vandy and MSU are ranked #81, #118 and #98 respectively. All that said, Locke has a better chance of being Brady-esque than the Sc, VAndy and MSU QBs.Did the Mississippi State QB look like Brady this past Saturday? Those 81 yards were a pain to deal with.
Matter of fact our last three quarterbacks faced in SEC wins were:
15/30 for 177 yards
17/29 for 141yards
13/21 for 81 yards
That's an average of allowing 56% passing for 133 yards per game and 1 TD and 1 INT.
1 touchdown pass allowed in 3 SEC wins......1.
No doubt. Considering where we started to where we will finish, any bowl is better than no bowl. The only concern is Missouri is considered better than any team we have beatn this year, they are at home, and we play poorly on the road.
Opps had some backwards numbers. Miss St is 56 and Misery is 58. All others are much worse.Agree completely about the bowl.
Not sure I agree about Missouri though. They have looked worse against SEC competition than MSU this season. You take away the two "impressive" wins they have against vastly inferior competition and the argument could be made they are the worst team in the SEC. I've seen parts of two games they have played and nothing about them looks good.
Opps had some backwards numbers. Miss St is 56 and Misery is 58. All others are much worse.
I use Sagarin's because I can understand them.Those look slightly more accurate. Is that the CBS ranking? If so that thing is hot garbage up and down the SEC aside from Bama. Take a look at the conference power rankings on seccountry.com, I think that is clearer picture of the conference.
Not to denigrate the Cats' efforts in those wins but it should be noted that the SC, Vandy and MSU QBs are not among the top 100 passers (by QB rating) in the nation. (FWIW, I think QBR is pretty darn good measure of QB passing efficiency.) The Mizzou QB is #64 but Johnson is #76 in that metric. Overall, Mizzou is #27 in passing YPG at 284 and UK #108 at 178 YPG. As passing teams go, SC, Vandy and MSU are ranked #81, #118 and #98 respectively. All that said, Locke has a better chance of being Brady-esque than the Sc, VAndy and MSU QBs.
I don't follow Mizzou but this will be the 3rd best passing team UK has faced so far this year, #19 USM and #21 NM State being the other two. Other than some quick pre-game looks I don't follow anyone other than UofL or UK but (other than bad luck ???) I see no reason "why" UK cannot win this one. This will be their 4th must win game and so far they have answered the bell.
NOTE: Above stats are based on FBS competition only.
True, the Cats have not won by much over some very mediocre teams but this season is all about getting the wins regardless of the game "optics". With each of those close wins over SC, Vandy and MSU have kept the 6 win season alive and avoided an almost unsalvageable sub .500 position. OTOH, the MTSU loss all but wrecked Mizzou's bowl chances. At 2-5, they must now sweep UK, SC and Vandy and hope for a miracle against either TN or AR.
Peace
Just had to add a message. Otherwise I would have ended on 3 6s.Ok it is about time to head back to Louisville Rivals.
Really don't have use for your "but's" on every game won or statistic in favor of Kentucky.
One thing for sure, he'll look like Brady on Saturday
Not to denigrate the Cats' efforts in those wins but it should be noted that the SC, Vandy and MSU QBs are not among the top 100 passers (by QB rating) in the nation. (FWIW, I think QBR is pretty darn good measure of QB passing efficiency.) The Mizzou QB is #64 but Johnson is #76 in that metric. Overall, Mizzou is #27 in passing YPG at 284 and UK #108 at 178 YPG. As passing teams go, SC, Vandy and MSU are ranked #81, #118 and #98 respectively. All that said, Locke has a better chance of being Brady-esque than the Sc, VAndy and MSU QBs.
I don't follow Mizzou but this will be the 3rd best passing team UK has faced so far this year, #19 USM and #21 NM State being the other two. Other than some quick pre-game looks I don't follow anyone other than UofL or UK but (other than bad luck ???) I see no reason "why" UK cannot win this one. This will be their 4th must win game and so far they have answered the bell.
NOTE: Above stats are based on FBS competition only.
True, the Cats have not won by much over some very mediocre teams but this season is all about getting the wins regardless of the game "optics". With each of those close wins over SC, Vandy and MSU have kept the 6 win season alive and avoided an almost unsalvageable sub .500 position. OTOH, the MTSU loss all but wrecked Mizzou's bowl chances. At 2-5, they must now sweep UK, SC and Vandy and hope for a miracle against either TN or AR.
Peace
I like how he started his post "not to denigrate..." and then proceeded to do exactly that. He's a very crafty Card fan, much more crafty than the average; so clever that I would even call him a "Card" fan, not a "Tard".Ok it is about time to head back to Louisville Rivals.
Really don't have use for your "but's" on every game won or statistic in favor of Kentucky.
We obviously have different understandings of the meaning of the verb "denigrate"...your's is wrong. [winking]I like how he started his post "not to denigrate..." and then proceeded to do exactly that. He's a very crafty Card fan, much more crafty than the average; so clever that I would even call him a "Card" fan, not a "Tard".
Did the Mississippi State QB look like Brady this past Saturday? Those 81 yards were a pain to deal with.
Matter of fact our last three quarterbacks faced in SEC wins were:
15/30 for 177 yards
17/29 for 141yards
13/21 for 81 yards
That's an average of allowing 56% passing for 133 yards per game and 1 TD and 1 INT.
1 touchdown pass allowed in 3 SEC wins......1.
HECK...Throw in Bama's game into the equation and it is still a 57.5% passing for 165 yards and 3 TD to 1 INT.
And you are still taking shots why? I think we all know.
I trust in God, but realize numerical data is the best way to present an opinion/argument/point lol.In God we trust. All others use data
Well, since when haven't such games been on the road against SEC West teams or MO & haven't most of those teams normally better than UK? Net, why would you expect a good past record in those games?What is our modern day record when kickoff is at noon in the central time zone ?
I don't post often, but I have been reading this board for years. WildCard always works a backhanded complement or some little dig at UK in a lot of his posts. He posts on almost every thread I read. While some of what he says may be true, I don't like hearing from a fan of our rival. I still welcome his posts, but I understand how he can irritate some of our fans...me included.WildCard is one of the better posters on this board. TS.
You're a good poster as rival fans go, but "your's" in a post criticizing someone else's grasp of the language? Tsk, tsk.We obviously have different understandings of the meaning of the verb "denigrate"...your's is wrong. [winking]
Peace
Against P5 competition he is 72-151 (48%), 5 td, 6 int and 236 passing yards per game.Mizzou may have the best QB in the SEC... that counts for a lot.