Bad feeling because I think there is a big gap in athletes in games I watched tonight compare to what I watched on Saturday.
I don't think so.
UK is also not very athletic or at least not more athletic than UofL.
Brea, Carr, Amour, and Kriisa are all laterally slow with limited athletic ability.
It's difficult to get any sort of feel about their defense from the first two games but it is worth noting that Duke almost beat them while shooting 4-23 from deep. Duke also outrebounded them and had fewer turnovers - UK only forced 7 turnovers all night. Looking at their stats that means Duke shot 50% on their 2 point attempts and scored 46 points in the paint.
Here is my roster comparison: (This is based on ability and potential, not on how they've performed during the first 2 games of the year.)
Chucky - Butler
Koren - Oweh
Edwards - Robinson
Rayne - Brea
Pryor - Carr
Scott - Garrison
Then it comes down to what group of remaining players you would rather have:
Waterman
Traore
Hadley
Rooths
or
Williams
Amour
Kriisa
I said it before the season - I think both rosters are shockingly similar and would go as far to say I think UofL has a better roster on paper. It will be up to PK to get his team to do what Pope is getting his team to do.
Chandler