And if you think it's just Baby Boomers running out of time, think again. Better hope there is no reorganization of FBS schools into the "haves and have nots" anytime soon. If there is, will we be in the "major league" or "minor league"?
Definitely minor. Clemson would be the SC school who was in the upper tier. We have not won half of the games we have played in our history. We have won exactly ONE conference championship in our history. We are not a top tier program in any way.And if you think it's just Baby Boomers running out of time, think again. Better hope there is no reorganization of FBS schools into the "haves and have nots" anytime soon. If there is, will we be in the "major league" or "minor league"?
South Carolina should take its cue from Florida, LSU and Auburn. Those schools are not pu$$y-footing around.Definitely minor. Clemson would be the SC school who was in the upper tier. We have not won half of the games we have played in our history. We have won exactly ONE conference championship in our history. We are not a top tier program in any way.
In SC history we have never been nationally relevant. At the height of Spurrier's success we always blew one game we should have won and we got destroyed in the one SEC championship game we played. We're basically Mississippi State, but we think we're Alabama.And if you think it's just Baby Boomers running out of time, think again. Better hope there is no reorganization of FBS schools into the "haves and have nots" anytime soon. If there is, will we be in the "major league" or "minor league"?