Particularly that goal tend non-call. And Cliff ran over some guy too. Kinda shocking. That goal tend non-call saved our asses.
Wisconsin fans were livid sitting near meReferring to the non goal tend
The flagrant was definitely a foul though I could see it being a common foul
Oh, you were there.Wisconsin fans were livid sitting near me
It wasn't goal-tending. They replayed it several times right after it happened. The announcers said what was obvious to anyone who viewed the replays....it was close, but the refs got it right.Particularly that goal tend non-call. And Cliff ran over some guy too. Kinda shocking. That goal tend non-call saved our asses.
The cutter ran by him and he hit him with an elbow.I will say though, I didn't see Simpson's intentional foul. Looked suspect.
Please expand on the Cliff comment..are you talking last play? (didn't see 2nd half so not sure if there was another moment you're referring to)Particularly that goal tend non-call. And Cliff ran over some guy too. Kinda shocking. That goal tend non-call saved our asses.
He is referring to when he ran over Hepburn, who had position but was called for the foul, made the basket and 1.Please expand on the Cliff comment..are you talking last play? (didn't see 2nd half so not sure if there was another moment you're referring to)
Looked like a flop tbhHe is referring to when he ran over Hepburn, who had position but was called for the foul, made the basket and 1.
I’ll go with Bardo on this not because I’m biased or anything. After OSU this year, I will spend little or no time worrying about close calls that went our way.Oh, you were there.
Yeah it was super super close, if I were there (and a Wisconsin fan) I probably would’ve been pissed. But they showed a replay and it looked like barely not a goal tend, which Bardo agreed with (while saying it was super super close)
That was not a goaltendParticularly that goal tend non-call. And Cliff ran over some guy too. Kinda shocking. That goal tend non-call saved our asses.
Ok so now you are saying we only won because of refs? StfuHe is referring to when he ran over Hepburn, who had position but was called for the foul, made the basket and 1.
Hepburn flopped. As soon as Cliff made contact with him, he fell over and started to grab at Cliff's shorts. It was the right call. UW has been called out for flopping more than any B1G team.He is referring to when he ran over Hepburn, who had position but was called for the foul, made the basket and 1.
IMHO a no call should have been the call.Hepburn flopped. As soon as Cliff made contact with him, he fell over and started to grab at Cliff's shorts. It was the right call. UW has been called out for flopping more than any B1G team.
oh, the flop. Saw that. Got it. "ran over with his butt" lolHe is referring to when he ran over Hepburn, who had position but was called for the foul, made the basket and 1.
I didnt say any such thing, just answering the posters question. You like to put words in peoples mouths dont you.Ok so now you are saying we only won because of refs? Stfu
100% a charge despite what announcer said.Also that foul on Hyatt, def looked like a charge. Wis player pushed off. But whatever. Big W.
If you mean Hyatts. Replay showed it wasn’t in cylinder.Particularly that goal tend non-call. And Cliff ran over some guy too. Kinda shocking. That goal tend non-call saved our asses.
Moving pick.. on the defense?So, I just imagined a T1 and moving pick that nearly decapitated someone dribbling the ball?
Sure. Went our way
Don’t ask so many questions. I’m 5 celebrating cocktails inMoving pick.. on the defense?
Good call. If it’s close you don’t call it.Oh, you were there.
Yeah it was super super close, if I were there (and a Wisconsin fan) I probably would’ve been pissed. But they showed a replay and it looked like barely not a goal tend, which Bardo agreed with (while saying it was super super close)
The ref 3 feet away disagreed.Really doesn't matter what replay showed. It looked like a goal tend watching from 30 feet away.
It doesn’t matter if the call was correct? What?Really doesn't matter what replay showed. It looked like a goal tend watching from 30 feet away.
You forget 2004 is ALWAYS right.It doesn’t matter if the call was correct? What?
So your saying it usually evens out?I will say though, I didn't see Simpson's intentional foul. Looked suspect.
Are you sure?I am as big a Rutgers fan as anyone, but we got some favorable calls on the road in Madison with two teams badly needing a W. I was surprised to see it. I and everyone else watching in real time at the game thought it was offensive interference. Officials easily could have called it as such. Lucky break. I will take it though. We got hosed in Ohio.
His shoulder as well.Wahl had like 3 offensive fouls not called...he was using the elbow to create space...
Dear Colonel,Hyatt’s follow up was a goal tend. The angle they kept showing at the end showed space between the ball and rim because of the camera angle. It wasn’t a camera over the rim. The initial replays clearly showed it was still in the cylinder. BTN was not going to harp on it. If that were the national championship game, trust me, we’d hear about it forever.
I’m not giving it back. We win. I’m sure we’ll get screwed again someday.
Wisconsin fans were also livid when Crowl elbowed Wahl in the neck. We do that too at home doesn’t mean we’re always right.Wisconsin fans were livid sitting near me