Conspiracy?..SMH!

Blueaz

Heisman
Jul 7, 2009
27,977
30,115
113
Looks to me like his math skills were off. He thought the four yard line was the two.
If the triangle market had been used all game, it is odd and deserving for UL it was pulled
 
  • Like
Reactions: Poetax

StubbornPenny

All-American
Nov 2, 2009
10,562
9,892
0
Your wring no way ACC can carry 2 into playoff. If they win out Clemson wins out ther teams,drop late in year i can very very very very very very very easily be UL,CLEM,BAMA,OSU!! EASILY SORRY HATERS UL WINS OUT THEY ARE IN. Oh yeah thats funny cause alot of people like Reese Davis and others believe the same.

They won't take two ACC teams, one of which didn't make their own title game, over a 1 loss B12 or Pac-12 team. If you believe otherwise, fine. Every other conference champion would have to have 2 losses.
 

CatMan2004

Heisman
Feb 3, 2004
31,595
13,829
77
Obviously, it was aliens!
 

willievic

All-American
Aug 28, 2005
6,167
7,111
0
Louisville lost, "Plain and Simple." I DON'T KNOW WHY THERE IS EVEN A DISCUSSION ABOUT IT ON THE UK BOARD.

OLD STOLL FIELD GUY!
 

LadyCaytIL

Heisman
Oct 28, 2012
32,049
32,859
113
All the cheating and scandals going on up there............ UL fans need to shut up about cheating... Even if Clemson cheated and all of it was on purpose............. then Clemson just beat UL at its own game and UL has no right to be upset.
 

buckkiller

All-Conference
Nov 6, 2003
131,233
2,466
0
UL's receiver shoukl of cut it in! Hell he could of juked dude or broke tackle maybe even scored.
 

Beatle Bum

Heisman
Sep 1, 2002
39,919
60,289
113
Think there was a frame by frame still picture of a hold that took place on hikutini on the 3rd down pass play on one of their boards. Cards haven't lost a game without being cheated in football or basketball in the last 3-4 years, perhaps longer. I'm sure the same applies to their baseball team but no one really cares about that.

I guess they overlooked the grabbing and holding by their DBs. The game was called consistently.
 

Beatle Bum

Heisman
Sep 1, 2002
39,919
60,289
113
There is no plausible explanation for that last play than I am of the belief that Quick thought the four was where the first down was which is as egregious as anything that happened on the play. A down marker never goes back from it's original spot, not due to yardage lost from scrimmage, not after a penalty or anything else. He simply went to the line of scrimmage presnap--despite having been on the field for the previous snaps from scrimmage where the two yard line was the first down spot--believing that the four was where the first down was. His reaction after running out of bounds was that of someone who really believed he coasted across...that was no acting job. That was all on him...I don't care if that marker was put up in the upper deck.

I love how fans are characterizing his reaction. When I saw the game and on replay it looked indecisive and as if he was trying to sell it. LOL
 

Beatle Bum

Heisman
Sep 1, 2002
39,919
60,289
113
Actually from the pic and video I just seen the marker wasn't on the field. However if not for the 5 yard penalty Quick may have made the TD. It doesn't really matter at the end of the game UofL was on the short end of the score board. Now you want to say UofL choked well my response to the is does Southern Mississippi ring a bell and the choke job U.K. Did during that game ?

Did UL not choke because UK did? Or, are you saying UL did choke, but it was okay because UK did too? Or, are you saying UL did not choke and, therefore, UK did not choke?