From On3's News Desk: Beamer snaps back at question about playcalling, offensive staff
- Thread starter Brian Shoemaker
- Start date
I posted this exact thing in one of the forum posts. He always snaps when they ask hard questions that he knows show he messed up
I believe this is Jack V. Now he's got some go-nads. Nothing but respect for him.
8 million a year. Answer for the incompetence.
Since he doesn't pay attention to stuff like "statistics" I guess there's nothing he needs to work on.
He's so doggone touchy and defensive. You're not that defensive if you don't know there's a problem.
No one at Shane's pressers asks tough questions because they're afraid of losing their press credentials except Jack from GC. And Shane snaps at him for it. Shane has to control the broken record narrative-"still trying my best to right the (sunken) ship"
Meh, I'd be worried if a coach wasn't testy during questioning 20 minutes after a disgusting defeat. I wouldn't expect to get the most level-headed and thoughtful responses at that moment. His answers in the press conference tomorrow would be much more telling, I think.
He’s thin-skinned always. Couple examples:
A mid-week press conference where he brought up a reporter who criticized the Logains hire. Watch that sometime you’ll see the same arrogance without merit mentality. But the key moment is the author said no one else wanted him as OC (I thought that was true). Beamer defends his hire by saying Logains had actually been contacted by another SEC program about being OC. And that did happen but what he conveniently left out was that the other program was Kentucky. Good job Beamer.
Exhibit B. After the 2022 UT win, don’t recall if this was post-game or later in the week but someone asked the reality of a different play caller other than Satterfield. Beamer snaps and goes “that’s the dumbest thing I have ever heard…” Really? Y’all scored 6 points, six! In the last game. The offense looked nothing close to that game not just that season but for the better part of 2 seasons. And this guy is appalled that someone ask what is a rather logical and obvious question.
So we got post game win, mid-week, and post-game loss. He’s wound too tight for this. He’s not an HC. It’s not his offense nor his defense. Last week we got the impression that he doesn’t command the respect of some of the other coaches.
I realized as I was typing this unnecessarily long reply that all of my examples are OC related. So that problem isn’t going away.
He grew up the son of a successful Head Coach and shares his name. He's pretty much been handed every job he's had. Growing up he probably heard a lot of "Good Boy". He's entitled to millions and now he has it. At our expense. Because if it were not for Ray Turner...
What exactly would you expect him to say?In the end it’s all about the result on the field and that is dreadful.Nothing he could say to change that fact except he is making a change at OC and that would buy him 1 more year which almost certainly he has anyway.
I think the offensive coaching is terrible I also unlike some on here think there is a severe lack of talent on the offensive side of the ball,which falls back on coaching as well.Every position group based on performance would rank at the bottom or near the bottom of the SEC.That includes QB as well.
I think the offensive coaching is terrible I also unlike some on here think there is a severe lack of talent on the offensive side of the ball,which falls back on coaching as well.Every position group based on performance would rank at the bottom or near the bottom of the SEC.That includes QB as well.
I would say a calm reply stating "I think we have to consider all options" would have been better.
Ironically, the first thing he said in the Sunday conference was that he doesn't make excuses....then proceeded to make excuses.
Yeah, what do the pff guys know anyway, lol?Since he doesn't pay attention to stuff like "statistics" I guess there's nothing he needs to work on.