Consolidate districts? Yes definitely. Schools..no. Combining Districts spreads out red tape cost of Supintendents, Asst Sup, secretaries for each, IT support, Purchasing, Maintenance and the such. Lots of slop in District offices.
Keeping schools smaller (and not consolidating) should actually be good for the student. Smaller school population should allow more opportunites for the students to get more teacher attention (smaller classes) and more opportunities to be involved in extra-curricular activities. Combine Vardaman, Calhoun City, and Bruce and you just eliminated 2 starting QBs, Shortstops, point guards, #1 Debate team, #1 Trombone etc..... Combine the schools and maybe some kids never try out for a certain sport and miss out on learning how to be part of a team atmosphere. Worse, you start bussing kids to an area where they dont live and it opens up more opportunity for some kids to go astray when at a young age they need to be growing up in their local community amongst the people they see every day...not 10 miles down the road. Aside of poor parenting, education in local schools is losing because of the hammer and redtape from bureacrats from above. Need to head back to the local community wanting to have successful schools and to be involved with their schools for life. And while I am bellyaching...give power back to the principals. They have been beaten down to puppet status in most areas. And track the success of a school by what its graduates are doing 2-4 years down the road. Did they advance to college, JC and pass or are they gainfully employed on a career path? Harder to track than the "test" they teach to but it would be a better guage of success of the school and community. Keep schools small and in their community, hire good teachers (not the clock watchers) and put the principals back in charge and education would improve.