Interception in the end zone that clearly hit the ground was a pretty big callI didn't see anything outrageous. The losing team always thinks the refs screwed them. There was no blatant call that changed the outcome.
I didn't see that play. I had to leave for a while. ACC replay usually pretty good from what I've seen.Interception in the end zone that clearly hit the ground was a pretty big call
Please read the rule on running into the kicker vs roughing the kicker so that you don’t look ignorantTypical Clemson. They got all the calls. Int in end zone was incomplete but review saw it otherwise. Could have been a FG. Missed face mask when we were 1 yard short, personal foul on kicker which should have been running into the kicker at the most.
Interception in the end zone that clearly hit the ground was a pretty big call
A couple of really bad calls went against us. I don’t think a call of serious consequence went against Clemson. Momentum killing? Oh you bet. The reason we lost? Most certainly not.
Name calling huh. Short man syndrome.Please read the rule on running into the kicker vs roughing the kicker so that you don’t look ignorant
Imagine that, the announce crew thought the sec was getting screwed…. Please look up the rules on roughing the kicker vs running into the kicker…. And then look up the rule on the ball hitting the ground while under control before you quote the ESPSEC crew. Both calls 100% by the rules. I don’t really like the rules, but it’s the rulesI’m biased. So I judge it based on the tv crew, and they were flabbergasted on multiple occasions, even with replay review.
Time to measure up big boi.Name calling huh. Short man syndrome.
Blocked into the kicker. Don’t forget the phantom PITypical Clemson. They got all the calls. Int in end zone was incomplete but review saw it otherwise. Could have been a FG. Missed face mask when we were 1 yard short, personal foul on kicker which should have been running into the kicker at the most.
ACC crew on the field, SEC in the replay booth.I didn't see that play. I had to leave for a while. ACC replay usually pretty good from what I've seen.
You mean the SEC channel TV crew?I’m biased. So I judge it based on the tv crew, and they were flabbergasted on multiple occasions, even with replay review.
Pretty spot onYou can go back and look at my posts; I am not one that blames officiating. I do think there were a couple of calls that changed the game in their favor. Why were lost, no, but did charge some of the thought process.
1) The PI towards the goal line was bad.. There was holding, pushing by both players, I don’t know how you single out the defensive player. The WR was just as active. That should have easily been a no call. Also was third down, giving them another set of downs.
2) interception in the end zone was absolutely egregious. Yes the players knee was down, but no football move was made and the ball very clearly came out before the catch was completed all the way to the ground. Take that off and we have the chance for points (changes the decision mashing later when we went for it down 6 instead of the option to potentially tie it)
3) Roughing call, not getting into running into the kicker vs roughing. Unless he absolutely shanked the kick, there is no way it wasn’t tipped. Would I bet my life on that one, no, but I also saw Goodwine (I think it was him) come off the field. Based on his body language, he thinks he got a hand in it.
4) There was another PI call that the official standing 10 feet from did not flag. The back judge 25 yards away did. Extended the drive
Yes, the officiating was terrible. Yes, I do think it affected the course of the game.
We lost because we could not run the football.
We lost because we could not protect Sellars.
We lost because we don’t have enough confidence in our ginormous QB going straight ahead to pick up 6 inches to start the second half. We lost because we could not keep the ball long enough to keep the D on the sideline to rest.
We lost because we decide to take a deep shot in third down after sustaining a drive (for the first time) by running the zone read. Then on fourth trying to boot Sellars on what I’d assume was a pass/keep option despite them spying him all day.
I disagree.... There were 3 calls in particular that were game changers. The int that hit the ground, the guy that rolled into the kicker after he was blocked, and the phantom PI call that kept their scoring drive alive.... Any of those 3 the other way could have changed the game.I didn't see anything outrageous. The losing team always thinks the refs screwed them. There was no blatant call that changed the outcome.
Sorry, you can't get blocked into a kicker and it be roughing... And you have to have control all the way through the catch to the ground. Not saying it changed the outcome, but momentum changes a lot of thingsImagine that, the announce crew thought the sec was getting screwed…. Please look up the rules on roughing the kicker vs running into the kicker…. And then look up the rule on the ball hitting the ground while under control before you quote the ESPSEC crew. Both calls 100% by the rules. I don’t really like the rules, but it’s the rules
These bad calls certainly led directly to Clemson points... too bad we couldn't capitalize when we needed to - on offense or defense. The officials didn't get us into -5 rushing yards at the end of the 2nd quarter.I disagree.... There were 3 calls in particular that were game changers. The int that hit the ground, the guy that rolled into the kicker after he was blocked, and the phantom PI call that kept their scoring drive alive.... Any of those 3 the other way could have changed the game.