Roster would be:
Renardo Sidney - cancer who didn't care about winning
Shaun Smith - - cancer who didn't care about winning
Kristers Zediaks - cancer who didn't care about winning
Wendell Lewis - not exactly a cancer, but his motivation wouldn't have improved a little with Stans like it has with Ray
Jalen Steele - decent SEC player
Roquez Johnson - he was absolutely terrible until Stans left, but maybe that's a coincidence
and then Ware, Sword, Thomas, and probably a few more late recruits, possibly some of the same ones that Ray brought in.
The roster would NOT include Rodney Hood, Deville Smith, or Devonta Pollard. This has been confirmed repeatedly that the first 2 were gone either way (getting rid of Stans is what made Hood at least think about staying), and it's been repeatedly confirmed that Pollard was never coming.
So we'd see largely the same roster, except we'd presumably still have Sidney, S. Smith, and Zediaks, and nobody on the team would play hard or care whether we won or lost.
Is it possible that we would be better than 4-7 had Stans stayed on? Maybe. Sidney did care a couple of times during his career, and maybe he could caused us to win today. But do you really believe we would be better off with him leading the team? We were going to be one of the worst teams in the SEC either way, and we would like **** the entire season.
Is Rick Ray definitely the answer? I hope so, today is a bad loss. If we're still this bad in year 3, by all means fire him. But at least we tried. He can't tear the program down any more than Stans would be had we kept him.
Renardo Sidney - cancer who didn't care about winning
Shaun Smith - - cancer who didn't care about winning
Kristers Zediaks - cancer who didn't care about winning
Wendell Lewis - not exactly a cancer, but his motivation wouldn't have improved a little with Stans like it has with Ray
Jalen Steele - decent SEC player
Roquez Johnson - he was absolutely terrible until Stans left, but maybe that's a coincidence
and then Ware, Sword, Thomas, and probably a few more late recruits, possibly some of the same ones that Ray brought in.
The roster would NOT include Rodney Hood, Deville Smith, or Devonta Pollard. This has been confirmed repeatedly that the first 2 were gone either way (getting rid of Stans is what made Hood at least think about staying), and it's been repeatedly confirmed that Pollard was never coming.
So we'd see largely the same roster, except we'd presumably still have Sidney, S. Smith, and Zediaks, and nobody on the team would play hard or care whether we won or lost.
Is it possible that we would be better than 4-7 had Stans stayed on? Maybe. Sidney did care a couple of times during his career, and maybe he could caused us to win today. But do you really believe we would be better off with him leading the team? We were going to be one of the worst teams in the SEC either way, and we would like **** the entire season.
Is Rick Ray definitely the answer? I hope so, today is a bad loss. If we're still this bad in year 3, by all means fire him. But at least we tried. He can't tear the program down any more than Stans would be had we kept him.