Will we still have belly-achers who want to be negative 24/7 and say that Stoops cannot get it done? IF....and I mean IF...we go on to win the next three and go bowling then I think we can safely assume that Stoops has grown as a coach and taking over the defense was the difference maker. I want Stoops to succeed because the man seems to bleed blue and would be the type to stick with our program even if the big boys came calling. In another thread a poster gave numerous examples of how individual players have improved since arriving under Stoops or Joker through Stoops tenure, but for some reason we have not seen it as a team.
Our defense has improved every single half under Stoops the last 3 games and I hope to see it continue.
If Gran can get Johnson even more comfortable running the read option offense then we have a great shot at winning our next three games, so lets get behind this team and show up in full force to cheer them on during this home stint.
IF we go 1-2 or 0-3 then I will admit that my expectations of Stoops were too much and I was wrong in thinking he had the ability to get it done.
Only question is can all of the negative Nancy's admit they are wrong if the opposite happens?
Our defense has improved every single half under Stoops the last 3 games and I hope to see it continue.
If Gran can get Johnson even more comfortable running the read option offense then we have a great shot at winning our next three games, so lets get behind this team and show up in full force to cheer them on during this home stint.
IF we go 1-2 or 0-3 then I will admit that my expectations of Stoops were too much and I was wrong in thinking he had the ability to get it done.
Only question is can all of the negative Nancy's admit they are wrong if the opposite happens?