To be honest. Outside of the QB position I think UK is every bit as good as UL talent wise. But they have a big time advantage at QB and an even bigger advantage with the head coaches. So I expect a beat down.
Who is handshaw?Trust in Gran and Handshaw to put the best possible game plan together
We are talking about Bobby Petrino. He will run the score up. I have no doubt about it.Kind of depends, really ...
Does UK have non-participant players attempt to pick a fight with UofL's players, or does UK attempt to warm up by jumping up and down on the Cardinal Logo at midfield? Then Petrino will probably do everything he can to break Georgia Tech's record margin of victory in a college football game.
If none of that happens, but instead if UofL is 10-1 and by some miracle we are playing in the ACC championship game the following weekend, then it would definitely be counterproductive to attempt to beat UK by as many points as possible. You play to win the game, and once you have victory in hand, you empty the bench and keep your starters from being injured, so that they are ready for the ACC championship game.
If instead UofL is 10-1 but is shut out of the ACC championship game, and if UofL needs an impressive win to give it a chance to make the College Football Playoffs, then you attempt to run up the score like Michigan did on Rutgers this past weekend.
And if UofL is 9-2 or worse coming into the game, then I think you are back to just winning the game and retaining the Governor's Cup. Bragging rights apply whether the margin is 1 or 100.
BB only folks are scared to death of football being good!!Only in Kentucky (and maybe North Carolina).........football is undisputed king to the rest of the country.
Time for us to catch up.
To be honest. Outside of the QB position I think UK is every bit as good as UL talent wise. But they have a big time advantage at QB and an even bigger advantage with the head coaches. So I expect a beat down.
You've convinced me. I don't even know who Gran and Handshaw are but I am starting to worry about this game. Thanks for the heads up guys.Trust in Gran and Handshaw to put the best possible game plan together
Let's see...PB or beating Otis?
Unless the offense can score 45+ they will not be in the game after halftime.If our players really believe they can win then there is a chance. Stuff happens in sports, to say we have 0 chance some 5-6 weeks from the game is silly imo. some of our young lb's are learning how to play and they might have speed enough to somewhat contain Lamar J. on paper they win easily but it won't be played on paper, some people might be surprised how competitive the game just might turn out.
PowerballI'm not up to date on the internet lingo, what is PB again?
What a difference a qb and a year make.UofL defensive line will probably be hard to contain. One player is not the difference between a top 5 team and a team in the bottom quarter of the nation. It would take the perfect storm for us to even be competitive in it. People are not taking into consideration that USCjr and Vandy have two of the worst offenses in the nation.
UofL defensive line will probably be hard to contain. One player is not the difference between a top 5 team and a team in the bottom quarter of the nation. It would take the perfect storm for us to even be competitive in it. People are not taking into consideration that USCjr and Vandy have two of the worst offenses in the nation.
When the player is Lamar Jackson then yes it does make that much of a difference. Outside of Lamar Jackson I would take our roster over UL's. You're also forgetting they play in the ACC. I would almost guarantee that UK would finish 7-5 give or take a win every year on a yearly basis if we were in the ACC. They never play anyone good. They beat a very down FSU team who I would not be surprised to see finish the season unranked. So if FSU drops out the rankings, and that's UL's best win. Then who is to say they're a top 5 team? Hell no. I think UL is very overrated. I think they're the 20th best team in country and the beneficiary of an absolutely garbage schedule. So I don't think anyone truly knows how good UL is. But a top 5 team in the hunt for a playoff spot? Nuh uh no way, that's just not the case. They're not a top 5 team. I don't think they're a top 10 team. I could see us beating UL. As we saw last season. Them without Lamar Jackson, we're a better team with a better roster. But Lamar Jackson is just that good. But if you take Lamar Jackson off that team then I truly believe both teams are equally as good roster wise with UK having a slight edge on talent. And UL having a big time edge coaching. But UL has a million times better HC, and they'll always have better records due to the piss poor schedule and conference.UofL defensive line will probably be hard to contain. One player is not the difference between a top 5 team and a team in the bottom quarter of the nation. It would take the perfect storm for us to even be competitive in it. People are not taking into consideration that USCjr and Vandy have two of the worst offenses in the nation.
Bobby is not playing against our team, he is playing against this quality administration.Fact is, we need to dominate the state in football. It is time to start beating UL consistently.
I believe by the end of the season, this offense will be able to score on anyone and we have a chance to win against UL.
Yes, their QB is incredible, but injuries could happen before that and I also trust Stoops to have a good defensive gameplan to try and limit his damage.
And a HCWhat a difference a qb and a year make.
Yeah because the SEC East is just loaded with top-tier teams this year...You're also forgetting they play in the ACC. I would almost guarantee that UK would finish 7-5 give or take a win every year on a yearly basis if we were in the ACC. They never play anyone good.
You forget we play 2 SEC west teams a year. Until this year MSU had been really good. And we played Alabama. And Texas AM and Tennessee would be the 2nd and 4th best teams in ACC, bama would be number one, Florida would be top 5. UGA is usually good. I think you 100% misread the context of what I was saying. I was saying on a year in and year out basis. A 5-7 SEC team is equal to a 7-5 ACC team IMO. I wasn't talking bout just this year. Was saying if we were in ACC we would finish 7-5 6-6 or 8-4 at best. On a consistent basis, which takes in consideration all years. Now that we have the facility upgrades we have which will maintain our recruiting. We would definitely win a lot more games in the AC if that's where we played. With UL's schedule. Most years. We would win a lot more games. Vice versa, if UL had our schedule, they would lose a lot more games. Usually we have one of the toughest schedules in the nation. No doubt if we were in ACC we would win A LOT more. We wouldn't be a bottom dweller in the ACC.Yeah because the SEC East is just loaded with top-tier teams this year...
We shouldn't lose any more games this year. 9*3, SEC East title, beat Alabama in SEC championship game, go to playoffs, win NC If that happens I say give MS an extensionAt this point we shouldn't write off any game..especially if we were to win the next 3 SEC games.
Counting this year UK is 43-42-4 against Vandy. How does that signal a better record in the ACC when you have not been dominate against the bottom teams in the SEC? As far as the rosters, your current starting QB is not as good as U of L's backup QB Kyle Bolin. Others better players on U of L's roster are safety JHC, Defensive End DF and tightend CH.You forget we play 2 SEC west teams a year. Until this year MSU had been really good. And we played Alabama. And Texas AM and Tennessee would be the 2nd and 4th best teams in ACC, bama would be number one, Florida would be top 5. UGA is usually good. I think you 100% misread the context of what I was saying. I was saying on a year in and year out basis. A 5-7 SEC team is equal to a 7-5 ACC team IMO. I wasn't talking bout just this year. Was saying if we were in ACC we would finish 7-5 6-6 or 8-4 at best. On a consistent basis, which takes in consideration all years. Now that we have the facility upgrades we have which will maintain our recruiting. We would definitely win a lot more games in the AC if that's where we played. With UL's schedule. Most years. We would win a lot more games. Vice versa, if UL had our schedule, they would lose a lot more games. Usually we have one of the toughest schedules in the nation. No doubt if we were in ACC we would win A LOT more. We wouldn't be a bottom dweller in the ACC.
To be honest. Outside of the QB position I think UK is every bit as good as UL talent wise. But they have a big time advantage at QB and an even bigger advantage with the head coaches. So I expect a beat down.
As for where you say UL is better. DE maybe, ours are young but I like the talent of ware, Allen etc more. TE? No. You just have a QB that can get him the ball. Safety? No. Our DB's are damn good. As I said. Outside of the QB position I like UK's talent more. I like UL's coach a million times more, which counts for a lot. And I also mentioned the facility upgrades which will maintain our recruiting and keep us out of competition with Vandy. It's kind of a new UK as far as a recruits perception goes so we will be on the rise at some point. And what I was saying. How we've been finishing 5-7 lately, in the ACC that would equal 7-5 considering the difference in schedule difficulties. Give us UL's cup cake schedule of Syracuse so on and so forth.Counting this year UK is 43-42-4 against Vandy. How does that signal a better record in the ACC when you have not been dominate against the bottom teams in the SEC? As far as the rosters, your current starting QB is not as good as U of L's backup QB Kyle Bolin. Others better players on U of L's roster are safety JHC, Defensive End DF and tightend CH.
No. I'm not saying that. Does the linebackers make up an entire teams talent? Damn didn't know. I'm talking about a team as a whole, outside the QB position where UL has clear advantage. The recruiting rankings even indicate as much as that UL's only advantage is the QB position, when you look at the team's as a whole OUTSIDE THE QB POSITION.So you're saying that at Linebacker that Kentucky is just as good/talented as James Hearns, DeVante Fields and Keith Kelsey...really...or Kentucky has a NT as talented as DeAngelo Brown....ok...
No. I'm not saying that. Does the linebackers make up an entire teams talent? Damn didn't know. I'm talking about a team as a whole, outside the QB position where UL has clear advantage. The recruiting rankings even indicate as much as that UL's only advantage is the QB position
Beating the three cupcakes UK schedules each season that helps to achieve that 5-7 record equates to beating which ACC teams? Feel free to mix and match or pick playing in one of the conference divisions.As for where you say UL is better. DE maybe, ours are young but I like the talent of ware, Allen etc more. TE? No. You just have a QB that can get him the ball. Safety? No. Our DB's are damn good. As I said. Outside of the QB position I like UK's talent more. I like UL's coach a million times more, which counts for a lot. And I also mentioned the facility upgrades which will maintain our recruiting and keep us out of competition with Vandy. It's kind of a new UK as far as a recruits perception goes so we will be on the rise at some point. And what I was saying. How we've been finishing 5-7 lately, in the ACC that would equal 7-5 considering the difference in schedule difficulties. Give us UL's cup cake schedule of Syracuse so on and so forth.
I would guarantee at least 6 wins with that schedule. Whereas our schedule equals 4-5 wins. Also. The competition these position groups of UL play against. Are against MUCH WEAKER competition. You all did play Clemson and FSU. But I don't count FSU as a good team. And the rest of the schedule. You have Houston. They play 2 good teams this season. Yes I truly believe UK at 5-7 would equal 7-5 in the ACC if they played only 2 good games a season. And every year in the history of ever. If we played in ACC we would win more games than in the SEC, regardless of how bad we are. The ACC is garbage for football, it's not a comparison with the competition of a brutal SEC. So yes 5-7 would equal 7-5 in garbage ACC.
Step away from the bottle dude. NC State would beat any team that UK has beaten.You forget we play 2 SEC west teams a year. Until this year MSU had been really good. And we played Alabama. And Texas AM and Tennessee would be the 2nd and 4th best teams in ACC, bama would be number one, Florida would be top 5. UGA is usually good. I think you 100% misread the context of what I was saying. I was saying on a year in and year out basis. A 5-7 SEC team is equal to a 7-5 ACC team IMO. I wasn't talking bout just this year. Was saying if we were in ACC we would finish 7-5 6-6 or 8-4 at best. On a consistent basis, which takes in consideration all years. Now that we have the facility upgrades we have which will maintain our recruiting. We would definitely win a lot more games in the AC if that's where we played. With UL's schedule. Most years. We would win a lot more games. Vice versa, if UL had our schedule, they would lose a lot more games. Usually we have one of the toughest schedules in the nation. No doubt if we were in ACC we would win A LOT more. We wouldn't be a bottom dweller in the ACC.
UK is 56-53 lifetime against teams currently in the ACC and many of those games are from yesteryear. UK is 0-1 against Pitt, SYR, BC and 0-4 against duke. I appreciate your optimism and faith in your school but IMO you are over reaching at this stage of your program.Beating the three cupcakes UK schedules each season that helps to achieve that 5-7 record equates to beating which ACC teams? Feel free to mix and match or pick playing in one of the conference divisions.
Fact is, we need to dominate the state in football. It is time to start beating UL consistently.
I believe by the end of the season, this offense will be able to score on anyone and we have a chance to win against UL.
Yes, their QB is incredible, but injuries could happen before that and I also trust Stoops to have a good defensive gameplan to try and limit his damage.
No. I'm not saying that. Does the linebackers make up an entire teams talent? Damn didn't know. I'm talking about a team as a whole, outside the QB position where UL has clear advantage. The recruiting rankings even indicate as much as that UL's only advantage is the QB position, when you look at the team's as a whole OUTSIDE THE QB POSITION.
When the player is Lamar Jackson then yes it does make that much of a difference. Outside of Lamar Jackson I would take our roster over UL's. You're also forgetting they play in the ACC. I would almost guarantee that UK would finish 7-5 give or take a win every year on a yearly basis if we were in the ACC. They never play anyone good. They beat a very down FSU team who I would not be surprised to see finish the season unranked. So if FSU drops out the rankings, and that's UL's best win. Then who is to say they're a top 5 team? Hell no. I think UL is very overrated. I think they're the 20th best team in country and the beneficiary of an absolutely garbage schedule. So I don't think anyone truly knows how good UL is. But a top 5 team in the hunt for a playoff spot? Nuh uh no way, that's just not the case. They're not a top 5 team. I don't think they're a top 10 team. I could see us beating UL. As we saw last season. Them without Lamar Jackson, we're a better team with a better roster. But Lamar Jackson is just that good. But if you take Lamar Jackson off that team then I truly believe both teams are equally as good roster wise with UK having a slight edge on talent. And UL having a big time edge coaching. But UL has a million times better HC, and they'll always have better records due to the piss poor schedule and conference.
But yes one player does make that team. Without Lamar that team is an average unranked team no doubt in my mind about it. I honestly think our team as a whole has better players. They just have by far the best player. And when it's the QB. It makes a huge difference. But by no means in any way shape or form is UL a top 5 team. They might end the season with zero wins over ranked teams but we want to call them top 5? Sorry just not buying it. UL is easily one of the most overrated teams. They're good but not great. Without Lamar Jackson they are NOT a top 25 team not a doubt in my mind. And I wouldn't be completely surprised to see UK pull off the upset if they figure out some type of way to contain Lamar Jackson, which is the toughest of challenges. BUT our defense is much improved. So we'll see. I really don't think UL is that good. At all. They're not the powerhouse many here make them out to be. They're a product of a weak schedule in a weak conference.
You forget we play 2 SEC west teams a year. Until this year MSU had been really good. And we played Alabama. And Texas AM and Tennessee would be the 2nd and 4th best teams in ACC, bama would be number one, Florida would be top 5. UGA is usually good. I think you 100% misread the context of what I was saying. I was saying on a year in and year out basis. A 5-7 SEC team is equal to a 7-5 ACC team IMO. I wasn't talking bout just this year. Was saying if we were in ACC we would finish 7-5 6-6 or 8-4 at best. On a consistent basis, which takes in consideration all years. Now that we have the facility upgrades we have which will maintain our recruiting. We would definitely win a lot more games in the AC if that's where we played. With UL's schedule. Most years. We would win a lot more games. Vice versa, if UL had our schedule, they would lose a lot more games. Usually we have one of the toughest schedules in the nation. No doubt if we were in ACC we would win A LOT more. We wouldn't be a bottom dweller in the ACC.
Alabama is tough, that I give you. But...Louisville beat Texas A&M in bowl game last year, who just beat Tennessee. FSU beat Ole Miss by double digits, who waxed Georgia. Clemson beat Auburn in their own yard, who beat LSU.
According to current Sagarin rankings, UK is projected to finish the season 4-8. According to those same ratings, Sagarin predicts UK would also have 4 wins playing Louisville's schedule, beating only Charlotte, Marshall, and escaping Syracuse & Duke by a 1/2 point each.