I'm Not Writing off the UL Game

Nov 29, 2015
1,735
627
0
To be honest. Outside of the QB position I think UK is every bit as good as UL talent wise. But they have a big time advantage at QB and an even bigger advantage with the head coaches. So I expect a beat down.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sluggercatfan

Ukbrassowtipin

Heisman
Aug 12, 2011
82,109
89,931
0
Kind of depends, really ...

Does UK have non-participant players attempt to pick a fight with UofL's players, or does UK attempt to warm up by jumping up and down on the Cardinal Logo at midfield? Then Petrino will probably do everything he can to break Georgia Tech's record margin of victory in a college football game.

If none of that happens, but instead if UofL is 10-1 and by some miracle we are playing in the ACC championship game the following weekend, then it would definitely be counterproductive to attempt to beat UK by as many points as possible. You play to win the game, and once you have victory in hand, you empty the bench and keep your starters from being injured, so that they are ready for the ACC championship game.

If instead UofL is 10-1 but is shut out of the ACC championship game, and if UofL needs an impressive win to give it a chance to make the College Football Playoffs, then you attempt to run up the score like Michigan did on Rutgers this past weekend.

And if UofL is 9-2 or worse coming into the game, then I think you are back to just winning the game and retaining the Governor's Cup. Bragging rights apply whether the margin is 1 or 100.
We are talking about Bobby Petrino. He will run the score up. I have no doubt about it.
 

Shydog

Heisman
Sep 11, 2013
6,771
10,837
113
If our players really believe they can win then there is a chance. Stuff happens in sports, to say we have 0 chance some 5-6 weeks from the game is silly imo. some of our young lb's are learning how to play and they might have speed enough to somewhat contain Lamar J. on paper they win easily but it won't be played on paper, some people might be surprised how competitive the game just might turn out.
 

51stFan

Junior
Dec 30, 2005
405
341
0
To be honest. Outside of the QB position I think UK is every bit as good as UL talent wise. But they have a big time advantage at QB and an even bigger advantage with the head coaches. So I expect a beat down.

UofL defensive line will probably be hard to contain. One player is not the difference between a top 5 team and a team in the bottom quarter of the nation. It would take the perfect storm for us to even be competitive in it. People are not taking into consideration that USCjr and Vandy have two of the worst offenses in the nation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TDredbird

KentuckyStout

Heisman
Sep 13, 2009
10,370
19,319
65
Threads like this are what two cupcakes and a bye week get you.

Most likely we head to Louisville searching for our third straight 5-7 season and leave 4-8 just like everyone with a brain knew we would do after watching the Southern Miss game.
 

sluggercatfan

Heisman
Aug 17, 2004
35,953
29,631
0
If our players really believe they can win then there is a chance. Stuff happens in sports, to say we have 0 chance some 5-6 weeks from the game is silly imo. some of our young lb's are learning how to play and they might have speed enough to somewhat contain Lamar J. on paper they win easily but it won't be played on paper, some people might be surprised how competitive the game just might turn out.
Unless the offense can score 45+ they will not be in the game after halftime.
 

sluggercatfan

Heisman
Aug 17, 2004
35,953
29,631
0
UofL defensive line will probably be hard to contain. One player is not the difference between a top 5 team and a team in the bottom quarter of the nation. It would take the perfect storm for us to even be competitive in it. People are not taking into consideration that USCjr and Vandy have two of the worst offenses in the nation.
What a difference a qb and a year make.
 
Nov 29, 2015
1,735
627
0
UofL defensive line will probably be hard to contain. One player is not the difference between a top 5 team and a team in the bottom quarter of the nation. It would take the perfect storm for us to even be competitive in it. People are not taking into consideration that USCjr and Vandy have two of the worst offenses in the nation.
UofL defensive line will probably be hard to contain. One player is not the difference between a top 5 team and a team in the bottom quarter of the nation. It would take the perfect storm for us to even be competitive in it. People are not taking into consideration that USCjr and Vandy have two of the worst offenses in the nation.
When the player is Lamar Jackson then yes it does make that much of a difference. Outside of Lamar Jackson I would take our roster over UL's. You're also forgetting they play in the ACC. I would almost guarantee that UK would finish 7-5 give or take a win every year on a yearly basis if we were in the ACC. They never play anyone good. They beat a very down FSU team who I would not be surprised to see finish the season unranked. So if FSU drops out the rankings, and that's UL's best win. Then who is to say they're a top 5 team? Hell no. I think UL is very overrated. I think they're the 20th best team in country and the beneficiary of an absolutely garbage schedule. So I don't think anyone truly knows how good UL is. But a top 5 team in the hunt for a playoff spot? Nuh uh no way, that's just not the case. They're not a top 5 team. I don't think they're a top 10 team. I could see us beating UL. As we saw last season. Them without Lamar Jackson, we're a better team with a better roster. But Lamar Jackson is just that good. But if you take Lamar Jackson off that team then I truly believe both teams are equally as good roster wise with UK having a slight edge on talent. And UL having a big time edge coaching. But UL has a million times better HC, and they'll always have better records due to the piss poor schedule and conference.

But yes one player does make that team. Without Lamar that team is an average unranked team no doubt in my mind about it. I honestly think our team as a whole has better players. They just have by far the best player. And when it's the QB. It makes a huge difference. But by no means in any way shape or form is UL a top 5 team. They might end the season with zero wins over ranked teams but we want to call them top 5? Sorry just not buying it. UL is easily one of the most overrated teams. They're good but not great. Without Lamar Jackson they are NOT a top 25 team not a doubt in my mind. And I wouldn't be completely surprised to see UK pull off the upset if they figure out some type of way to contain Lamar Jackson, which is the toughest of challenges. BUT our defense is much improved. So we'll see. I really don't think UL is that good. At all. They're not the powerhouse many here make them out to be. They're a product of a weak schedule in a weak conference.
 

thepip

All-Conference
Dec 31, 2009
7,467
2,351
0
Fact is, we need to dominate the state in football. It is time to start beating UL consistently.

I believe by the end of the season, this offense will be able to score on anyone and we have a chance to win against UL.

Yes, their QB is incredible, but injuries could happen before that and I also trust Stoops to have a good defensive gameplan to try and limit his damage.
Bobby is not playing against our team, he is playing against this quality administration.
 
Nov 29, 2015
1,735
627
0
Yeah because the SEC East is just loaded with top-tier teams this year...
You forget we play 2 SEC west teams a year. Until this year MSU had been really good. And we played Alabama. And Texas AM and Tennessee would be the 2nd and 4th best teams in ACC, bama would be number one, Florida would be top 5. UGA is usually good. I think you 100% misread the context of what I was saying. I was saying on a year in and year out basis. A 5-7 SEC team is equal to a 7-5 ACC team IMO. I wasn't talking bout just this year. Was saying if we were in ACC we would finish 7-5 6-6 or 8-4 at best. On a consistent basis, which takes in consideration all years. Now that we have the facility upgrades we have which will maintain our recruiting. We would definitely win a lot more games in the AC if that's where we played. With UL's schedule. Most years. We would win a lot more games. Vice versa, if UL had our schedule, they would lose a lot more games. Usually we have one of the toughest schedules in the nation. No doubt if we were in ACC we would win A LOT more. We wouldn't be a bottom dweller in the ACC.
 

JC CATS

Heisman
Jun 18, 2009
23,517
12,221
0
At this point we shouldn't write off any game..especially if we were to win the next 3 SEC games.
We shouldn't lose any more games this year. 9*3, SEC East title, beat Alabama in SEC championship game, go to playoffs, win NC If that happens I say give MS an extension
 
  • Like
Reactions: truckbrandon
Jul 26, 2003
21,180
11,161
0
They are impossible to beat for a team that plays conservative trying to keep it close. A team like that they crush because of the way they take away the run first. And on defense playing soft to make them drive it opens up the QB run. We would have to go in with a different mind set than we normally do of not worrying about possibly losing 70-0 because of attacking hard on offense and defense. IMO that would be our only chance, being the aggressor on both sides of the ball the whole game and just hope we get in a rythem doing it.

Would you rather lose 45-7 playing conservative to at least keep it respectable? Or possibly lose 60-0 playing to win but at least giving us a chance to win if we make some plays, get confidence and get in a rythem?
 
  • Like
Reactions: sluggercatfan

HiStepper

All-Conference
Aug 1, 2001
4,435
1,841
113
You forget we play 2 SEC west teams a year. Until this year MSU had been really good. And we played Alabama. And Texas AM and Tennessee would be the 2nd and 4th best teams in ACC, bama would be number one, Florida would be top 5. UGA is usually good. I think you 100% misread the context of what I was saying. I was saying on a year in and year out basis. A 5-7 SEC team is equal to a 7-5 ACC team IMO. I wasn't talking bout just this year. Was saying if we were in ACC we would finish 7-5 6-6 or 8-4 at best. On a consistent basis, which takes in consideration all years. Now that we have the facility upgrades we have which will maintain our recruiting. We would definitely win a lot more games in the AC if that's where we played. With UL's schedule. Most years. We would win a lot more games. Vice versa, if UL had our schedule, they would lose a lot more games. Usually we have one of the toughest schedules in the nation. No doubt if we were in ACC we would win A LOT more. We wouldn't be a bottom dweller in the ACC.
Counting this year UK is 43-42-4 against Vandy. How does that signal a better record in the ACC when you have not been dominate against the bottom teams in the SEC? As far as the rosters, your current starting QB is not as good as U of L's backup QB Kyle Bolin. Others better players on U of L's roster are safety JHC, Defensive End DF and tightend CH.
 
Mar 24, 2015
297
202
0
Any given team on any given day...nah, it's going be an ugly L for us with a lot of ugly people holding their cigarette stained fingers in the shape of an L.
 

CB3UK

Hall of Famer
Apr 15, 2012
62,983
103,707
78
I'm writing it off. Until the week of. More important games to focus on now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: merrimanm

Michigan Fan

All-Conference
Feb 18, 2003
9,872
2,274
62
To be honest. Outside of the QB position I think UK is every bit as good as UL talent wise. But they have a big time advantage at QB and an even bigger advantage with the head coaches. So I expect a beat down.

So you're saying that at Linebacker that Kentucky is just as good/talented as James Hearns, DeVante Fields and Keith Kelsey...really...or Kentucky has a NT as talented as DeAngelo Brown....ok...
 
Nov 29, 2015
1,735
627
0
Counting this year UK is 43-42-4 against Vandy. How does that signal a better record in the ACC when you have not been dominate against the bottom teams in the SEC? As far as the rosters, your current starting QB is not as good as U of L's backup QB Kyle Bolin. Others better players on U of L's roster are safety JHC, Defensive End DF and tightend CH.
As for where you say UL is better. DE maybe, ours are young but I like the talent of ware, Allen etc more. TE? No. You just have a QB that can get him the ball. Safety? No. Our DB's are damn good. As I said. Outside of the QB position I like UK's talent more. I like UL's coach a million times more, which counts for a lot. And I also mentioned the facility upgrades which will maintain our recruiting and keep us out of competition with Vandy. It's kind of a new UK as far as a recruits perception goes so we will be on the rise at some point. And what I was saying. How we've been finishing 5-7 lately, in the ACC that would equal 7-5 considering the difference in schedule difficulties. Give us UL's cup cake schedule of Syracuse so on and so forth.

I would guarantee at least 6 wins with that schedule. Whereas our schedule equals 4-5 wins. Also. The competition these position groups of UL play against. Are against MUCH WEAKER competition. You all did play Clemson and FSU. But I don't count FSU as a good team. And the rest of the schedule. You have Houston. They play 2 good teams this season. Yes I truly believe UK at 5-7 would equal 7-5 in the ACC if they played only 2 good games a season. And every year in the history of ever. If we played in ACC we would win more games than in the SEC, regardless of how bad we are. The ACC is garbage for football, it's not a comparison with the competition of a brutal SEC. So yes 5-7 would equal 7-5 in garbage ACC.
 
Nov 29, 2015
1,735
627
0
So you're saying that at Linebacker that Kentucky is just as good/talented as James Hearns, DeVante Fields and Keith Kelsey...really...or Kentucky has a NT as talented as DeAngelo Brown....ok...
No. I'm not saying that. Does the linebackers make up an entire teams talent? Damn didn't know. I'm talking about a team as a whole, outside the QB position where UL has clear advantage. The recruiting rankings even indicate as much as that UL's only advantage is the QB position, when you look at the team's as a whole OUTSIDE THE QB POSITION.
 

Michigan Fan

All-Conference
Feb 18, 2003
9,872
2,274
62
No. I'm not saying that. Does the linebackers make up an entire teams talent? Damn didn't know. I'm talking about a team as a whole, outside the QB position where UL has clear advantage. The recruiting rankings even indicate as much as that UL's only advantage is the QB position

Don't by recruiting rankings...if you go by those than Washington would be a middle of the pack Pac 12 school...not a school with the inside track to the CFP...to put it to you this way...if you go the rankings Kentucky has outrecruited them
 

HiStepper

All-Conference
Aug 1, 2001
4,435
1,841
113
As for where you say UL is better. DE maybe, ours are young but I like the talent of ware, Allen etc more. TE? No. You just have a QB that can get him the ball. Safety? No. Our DB's are damn good. As I said. Outside of the QB position I like UK's talent more. I like UL's coach a million times more, which counts for a lot. And I also mentioned the facility upgrades which will maintain our recruiting and keep us out of competition with Vandy. It's kind of a new UK as far as a recruits perception goes so we will be on the rise at some point. And what I was saying. How we've been finishing 5-7 lately, in the ACC that would equal 7-5 considering the difference in schedule difficulties. Give us UL's cup cake schedule of Syracuse so on and so forth.

I would guarantee at least 6 wins with that schedule. Whereas our schedule equals 4-5 wins. Also. The competition these position groups of UL play against. Are against MUCH WEAKER competition. You all did play Clemson and FSU. But I don't count FSU as a good team. And the rest of the schedule. You have Houston. They play 2 good teams this season. Yes I truly believe UK at 5-7 would equal 7-5 in the ACC if they played only 2 good games a season. And every year in the history of ever. If we played in ACC we would win more games than in the SEC, regardless of how bad we are. The ACC is garbage for football, it's not a comparison with the competition of a brutal SEC. So yes 5-7 would equal 7-5 in garbage ACC.
Beating the three cupcakes UK schedules each season that helps to achieve that 5-7 record equates to beating which ACC teams? Feel free to mix and match or pick playing in one of the conference divisions.
 

tluck28

Junior
Oct 7, 2016
496
389
0
You forget we play 2 SEC west teams a year. Until this year MSU had been really good. And we played Alabama. And Texas AM and Tennessee would be the 2nd and 4th best teams in ACC, bama would be number one, Florida would be top 5. UGA is usually good. I think you 100% misread the context of what I was saying. I was saying on a year in and year out basis. A 5-7 SEC team is equal to a 7-5 ACC team IMO. I wasn't talking bout just this year. Was saying if we were in ACC we would finish 7-5 6-6 or 8-4 at best. On a consistent basis, which takes in consideration all years. Now that we have the facility upgrades we have which will maintain our recruiting. We would definitely win a lot more games in the AC if that's where we played. With UL's schedule. Most years. We would win a lot more games. Vice versa, if UL had our schedule, they would lose a lot more games. Usually we have one of the toughest schedules in the nation. No doubt if we were in ACC we would win A LOT more. We wouldn't be a bottom dweller in the ACC.
Step away from the bottle dude. NC State would beat any team that UK has beaten.
 
  • Like
Reactions: brianpoe

HiStepper

All-Conference
Aug 1, 2001
4,435
1,841
113
Beating the three cupcakes UK schedules each season that helps to achieve that 5-7 record equates to beating which ACC teams? Feel free to mix and match or pick playing in one of the conference divisions.
UK is 56-53 lifetime against teams currently in the ACC and many of those games are from yesteryear. UK is 0-1 against Pitt, SYR, BC and 0-4 against duke. I appreciate your optimism and faith in your school but IMO you are over reaching at this stage of your program.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tluck28

Stenchymouse

All-American
Jul 31, 2005
12,633
6,219
113
The worst *** beating we will take this year will come from Louisville!

The good thing is that them crushing us by 40 just highlights the gap between our programs and puts more heat on Barnhardt.

Petrino will definitely be making a statement against us this year...
 
  • Like
Reactions: brianpoe

ville 77

Redshirt
Jul 15, 2013
1,045
41
0
Fact is, we need to dominate the state in football. It is time to start beating UL consistently.

I believe by the end of the season, this offense will be able to score on anyone and we have a chance to win against UL.

Yes, their QB is incredible, but injuries could happen before that and I also trust Stoops to have a good defensive gameplan to try and limit his damage.
 

phenderson

Freshman
Aug 3, 2006
3,885
79
0
No. I'm not saying that. Does the linebackers make up an entire teams talent? Damn didn't know. I'm talking about a team as a whole, outside the QB position where UL has clear advantage. The recruiting rankings even indicate as much as that UL's only advantage is the QB position, when you look at the team's as a whole OUTSIDE THE QB POSITION.

So when you get the guys onto Campus, the next step is to develop them. You can bring in 20x 5-star guys... and then never develop them so that they play like 3-stars. Matt Elam is a curious case. Probably the highest ranked DL recruit UK has acquired, since Dennis Johnson. Elam is not on a SINGLE draft board as a junior...or senior. In fact, I would break the positions down like this...

1) Bam Williams is the best Running back in the game... followed by Radcliff. Schnell is no better than our 3 other 6'0" running backs..

2) We already know Jackson is superior to every QB in the South Eastern Conference. Dobbs runs a close close close 2nd... I give Johnson his props... but poor Barker... smh...

3) Jones for UK, is a good LB... he has to be... but Fields wasn't even our best guy last year... it was Treyvon Young who got injured during the bowl game. Hearns is up there as well... and then we have 2 more LB's, one who will get drafted this year.

4) Our Line did the job on Dalvin COok... 54 yards is his lowest total of the season. Keep in mind...we held FSU to their lowest total of the season in Yards and points... James Hearns has the same amount of sacks as your guy Ware...

5) Our OL has kept our QB clean... only 8 sacks this year, so far. And 5 of those came against Clemson.

6) We have faced to top-20 offenses, Clemson and FSU, and we have gone 1-1 against them. UK has gone 0-2 against the likes of BAMA and Southern Miss...

7) The ultimate indicator of talent is the number of guys getting drafted into the NFL... We are probably looking at 6-10 players being drafted in this 2016 draft: JHC, Staples, Fields, COle H, etc).
 
  • Like
Reactions: TDredbird

TDredbird

Sophomore
Jul 14, 2016
114
156
0
When the player is Lamar Jackson then yes it does make that much of a difference. Outside of Lamar Jackson I would take our roster over UL's. You're also forgetting they play in the ACC. I would almost guarantee that UK would finish 7-5 give or take a win every year on a yearly basis if we were in the ACC. They never play anyone good. They beat a very down FSU team who I would not be surprised to see finish the season unranked. So if FSU drops out the rankings, and that's UL's best win. Then who is to say they're a top 5 team? Hell no. I think UL is very overrated. I think they're the 20th best team in country and the beneficiary of an absolutely garbage schedule. So I don't think anyone truly knows how good UL is. But a top 5 team in the hunt for a playoff spot? Nuh uh no way, that's just not the case. They're not a top 5 team. I don't think they're a top 10 team. I could see us beating UL. As we saw last season. Them without Lamar Jackson, we're a better team with a better roster. But Lamar Jackson is just that good. But if you take Lamar Jackson off that team then I truly believe both teams are equally as good roster wise with UK having a slight edge on talent. And UL having a big time edge coaching. But UL has a million times better HC, and they'll always have better records due to the piss poor schedule and conference.

But yes one player does make that team. Without Lamar that team is an average unranked team no doubt in my mind about it. I honestly think our team as a whole has better players. They just have by far the best player. And when it's the QB. It makes a huge difference. But by no means in any way shape or form is UL a top 5 team. They might end the season with zero wins over ranked teams but we want to call them top 5? Sorry just not buying it. UL is easily one of the most overrated teams. They're good but not great. Without Lamar Jackson they are NOT a top 25 team not a doubt in my mind. And I wouldn't be completely surprised to see UK pull off the upset if they figure out some type of way to contain Lamar Jackson, which is the toughest of challenges. BUT our defense is much improved. So we'll see. I really don't think UL is that good. At all. They're not the powerhouse many here make them out to be. They're a product of a weak schedule in a weak conference.


No offense intended but the sec east is probably the worst division in P5 football. UofL could bring K Bolin in and most likely roll UK. Who has UK played or beaten that is even remotely good? Latest sos that I saw was UofL is top 5 while UK is 63rd. Your defense is much improved but it's been against teams that are absolutely terrible. Good luck on November 26th.
 

ajgcardman

All-Conference
Jan 23, 2006
10,376
3,900
81
You forget we play 2 SEC west teams a year. Until this year MSU had been really good. And we played Alabama. And Texas AM and Tennessee would be the 2nd and 4th best teams in ACC, bama would be number one, Florida would be top 5. UGA is usually good. I think you 100% misread the context of what I was saying. I was saying on a year in and year out basis. A 5-7 SEC team is equal to a 7-5 ACC team IMO. I wasn't talking bout just this year. Was saying if we were in ACC we would finish 7-5 6-6 or 8-4 at best. On a consistent basis, which takes in consideration all years. Now that we have the facility upgrades we have which will maintain our recruiting. We would definitely win a lot more games in the AC if that's where we played. With UL's schedule. Most years. We would win a lot more games. Vice versa, if UL had our schedule, they would lose a lot more games. Usually we have one of the toughest schedules in the nation. No doubt if we were in ACC we would win A LOT more. We wouldn't be a bottom dweller in the ACC.

Alabama is tough, that I give you. But...Louisville beat Texas A&M in bowl game last year, who just beat Tennessee. FSU beat Ole Miss by double digits, who waxed Georgia. Clemson beat Auburn in their own yard, who beat LSU.

According to current Sagarin rankings, UK is projected to finish the season 4-8. According to those same ratings, Sagarin predicts UK would also have 4 wins playing Louisville's schedule, beating only Charlotte, Marshall, and escaping Syracuse & Duke by a 1/2 point each.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TDredbird

51stFan

Junior
Dec 30, 2005
405
341
0
Threads like these are the ones that real football schools come over here and laugh at. I'm all for UK, but in no way are we in position to compete with most of the upper half of college football.
 

canebreak

All-Conference
Jan 26, 2004
4,464
1,804
0
UL does not have a superb defense. GooD yes. But to use the word superb is silly. The problem is UK has below average offense. A good offense can score 40 on UL.
 

canebreak

All-Conference
Jan 26, 2004
4,464
1,804
0
Alabama is tough, that I give you. But...Louisville beat Texas A&M in bowl game last year, who just beat Tennessee. FSU beat Ole Miss by double digits, who waxed Georgia. Clemson beat Auburn in their own yard, who beat LSU.

According to current Sagarin rankings, UK is projected to finish the season 4-8. According to those same ratings, Sagarin predicts UK would also have 4 wins playing Louisville's schedule, beating only Charlotte, Marshall, and escaping Syracuse & Duke by a 1/2 point each.


This is pretty stupid logic. I could do the same with other scenarios but it is meaningless. UL would have their hands full against Ole miss or A&M. Or UT. Other than your QB they probably all have more talent on the field. One good hit to lamar and they would all likely beat you.