Okay. I am completely calm now. LOL! I laugh when a poster tells me to take a deep breath, or calm down. It tells me that he can't refute what I am saying. As a former athlete who knows other athletes, I would say that players don't make their college decisions over a couple of wins and losses. I was lucky enough to have help from my parents. Some players don't get much of that, but everyone tries to figure out where their lives will be best in the next 4-5 years. The rapport with the head coach and the position coach is critical. You have to believe the coaches have the ship headed in the right direction. If you have other career interests besides football, the school must offer the right academics. I have never seen a player say he is going to a school if they win 6 games, but he won't go if they win 4 or 5. And that includes kids without parental supervision. They care about the future, not the past so much. If I was considering signing in Kentucky's 2017 class, I certainly care whether the program appears to be in sound hands. I care a lot about the campus environment. I care a lot about my relationship with Coach Stoops. But why do I care about the 2016 record? I won't even be there in 2016. I sure as hell care about the record in 2017-20, but that's a different issue. That requires an assessment of the direction the program is headed in. So I see new construction everywhere, a new practice facility, a remodeled stadium, and great recruiting classes in 2016 and 2017. Relatively speaking, whether Kentucky wins this game or that game in 2016 means nothing unless I see something in those games that makes me believe Stoops is failing. Usually, you can't see that in 1 or 2 games, especially when the coach is recruiting as well as Stoops is now. I hope this helps.That was a well written response. The only problem is that it is factually incorrect. Take a deep breath and then go back and read what I wrote. I absolutely did not contradict myself. Focus on the part where I said "any particular recruit". That means that none of us can say what a single recruit, in this case, Mac Jones will do based on our record. Then I said as a rule, the recruits who are still on the fence could easily be swayed by our record. You are correct when you say that recruits have been signing with UK based on what they thought Stoops could do with the program. They have. Then, I was correct when I said that the time has come that recruits need to see some results. Stoops could sell them on his plan for the future when he didn't have much of a track record. He sold it real well. However, he has had two 5 win seasons in a row. If he doesn't improve on that this year, it is going to be really hard to sell recruits on a plan for improvement when the cold hard evidence tells them that we not improving at all. I also said that the margin of victory could play a part. I thought that was self-explanatory but let me spell it out for you. We could lose 7 but if two of those were to Bama and UT in overtime and all the other losses were close, Stoops could still make an argument that we are on an upward trajectory. Still, the bottom line is that wins help recruiting and losses hurt recruiting.
You are entitled to your opinion but so is everybody else. And remember it is just your opinion and because people have different opinions doesn't make them wrong.