OT: 2022-23 NHL thread….Devils & Rangers & Islanders

RU Cheese

All-Conference
Sep 14, 2003
4,928
3,308
113
You might want to forget the Rangers are playing tomorrow anyway.

Last week, after passing up all year the chance to waiver claim some fallen prospects that maybe could be salvaged like Eeli Tolvanen or Martin Kaut, the Rangers finally claimed the completely horrible Jake Lecschyzn who Gallant has a history with.

Anyway, Kreider and Gauthier are out tomorrow so the Rangers are icing two of the worst forwards in the league in Blais and Lecschyzn and a bunch of the other guys on the team are fighting a stomach bug.

It’s the Canadians so they could still win, but it might be a pretty ugly game.
Did Nashville waive Tovalen???
 

RUinBoston

All-Conference
Aug 17, 2006
1,405
1,051
63
It’s wild card Sunday, they knew that…dumb
IF you want bridge and tunnelers to come to the game you need to have a matinee.
Now THIS will be a fun discussion, lol.

First, agree the phrase “generational” is way overused. But, if we ONLY pick the best player, than you are leaving out either Gretzky or Lemieux. I have a problem with that.

Plus, IMO, this current generational story is still being told. It is quite possible that Hughes is added to the list. Not probable…but possible.

Just off the top of my head, here are some completely arbitrary “generation“ cut offs and some of the best players during that time. Tear it apart, haha!

40-60: Richard, Howe, Hull, Orr
70-90: Lafleur, Gretzky, Lemieux, Jagr
00-20: Crosby, Ovechkin, McDavid, ??

I would also like to mention, IMO, the best goalie ever born, Hasek, somewhere.
How 'bout Marty Muth*****g Brodeur?
 
  • Like
Reactions: zappaa and Ronnie_B

RUinBoston

All-Conference
Aug 17, 2006
1,405
1,051
63
I was going to bring him up but it was too obvious.
Trying to be completely fair and non-biased here, that Patrick Roy guy wasn't completely terrible. I don't know if we are allowed to have 2 'generational talent' goalies at the same time....that is a question for the committee.

Also trying (and failing) to be completely fair and non-biased...no fing way Messier is making the list 😄 .
 

zappaa

Heisman
Jul 27, 2001
73,537
89,758
103
'Bridge and tunnelers'. Is this not a common phrase? We used to use it all the time. It's the Jersey folks coming in to Manhattan for a day trip.
I see it as far less congested today/tonight at any time than your average weekday.
No Giants traffic.
 

krup

Heisman
Feb 5, 2003
70,133
10,066
0
Now THIS will be a fun discussion, lol.

First, agree the phrase “generational” is way overused. But, if we ONLY pick the best player, than you are leaving out either Gretzky or Lemieux. I have a problem with that.

Plus, IMO, this current generational story is still being told. It is quite possible that Hughes is added to the list. Not probable…but possible.

Just off the top of my head, here are some completely arbitrary “generation“ cut offs and some of the best players during that time. Tear it apart, haha!

40-60: Richard, Howe, Hull, Orr
70-90: Lafleur, Gretzky, Lemieux, Jagr
00-20: Crosby, Ovechkin, McDavid, ??

I would also like to mention, IMO, the best goalie ever born, Hasek, somewhere.
It basically implies that someone has talent that you only see very 20-30 years, but I don’t restrict it to “overall best player” though.

Someone brought up Bossy earlier, and I think that is a great example. There were better players in his era, but he was absolutely a generational talent at scoring goals (and I say that as a Ranger fan). Ovechkin is another good example you listed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mdh2003

krup

Heisman
Feb 5, 2003
70,133
10,066
0
Did Nashville waive Tovalen???
Yes, and the Kraken picked him up and he is doing very well for them (5 goals and 2 assists in 8 games). Evidently Seattle came after the Rangers in the waiver order so they passed.
 

mdh2003

All-Conference
Feb 4, 2003
4,859
3,778
78
IF you want bridge and tunnelers to come to the game you need to have a matinee.

How 'bout Marty Muth*****g Brodeur?
He might be my number 2 All time. Which means he’s hockey royalty. His biggest marvel, to me was his staying power. The guy never got hurt, was ridiculously consistently great, and played a legendary number of minutes.

I just think Hasek was more talented. I really didn’t have goalies on my list, Hasek was just an afterthought. But, yeah, I should have listed MB. He deserves to be mentioned as well.

Goalies are funny. For a few years, Billy Smith was absolute PO MONEY. And in real life, he looked like a plumber, haha. Dryden had an insane run (4 cups and 4 Vezinas, all in a row), but way too short a career. Would I have picked those guys, in their prime, in a SCF series over MB? Maybe. For their entire career, nope.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RUinBoston

TM94goRU

Heisman
Dec 12, 2020
14,915
13,474
113
Well I said there is the possibility of that happening. 😉

A little more filling out along with staying healthy will do a lot for that.
Bingo, more remedial weight training is a must. He falls too much for my liking.
 

TM94goRU

Heisman
Dec 12, 2020
14,915
13,474
113
The phrase generational talent is very overused. A generation is understood to be roughly 20-30 years.

Stick with the idea that Hughes looks like he might be one of the best players in the league for a while.

Trying to sell the idea that he will be the best player we will see in the couple decade time period that includes a lot of great players, but especially McDavid, is ridiculous.
I agree. I only added that because some talking heads insisted he wouldn't be at that level.
 

zappaa

Heisman
Jul 27, 2001
73,537
89,758
103
Laf and Kratsov doing nothing with top players against a weak opponent.
Trochek really struggling, but 74 is invisible.
Laf just plain sucks
 

krup

Heisman
Feb 5, 2003
70,133
10,066
0
Laf and Kratsov doing nothing with top players against a weak opponent.
Trochek really struggling, but 74 is invisible.
Laf just plain sucks
That line has been poor at 5v5, long before they put Kravstov on it. Trochek and Panarin have no chemistry. Kravstov’s defensive numbers are outstanding, but Trochek should be the goal scorer on the line and he is really slumping lately.

I have read from a few supposed insiders that Panarin has expressed that he is not comfortable with Chytil as his center. I think it is long past time to tell him “tough ****”. In the small amount of time Chytil and Panarin have been on the ice together they have been productive, and Chytil is wasted on the 3rd line between Goodrow and Vesey.

If nothing changes by the time Kreider and Gauthier come back, the lines should be:

Kreider/Mika/Kakko
Panarin/Chytil/Kravstov
Laf/Trochek/Gauthier
Goodrow/Brodzinski/Vesey

I’d send Laf down to Hartford before I’d put him on the 4th line, because at least he would get ice time to work on things in the AHL.
 

Ronnie_B

Heisman
Dec 30, 2011
9,911
10,457
113
I’d send Laf down to Hartford before I’d put him on the 4th line, because at least he would get ice time to work on things in the AHL.
That train might have moved on, I think he would have be exposed on waivers to send him down, he would surely get snapped up.
 
Last edited:

zappaa

Heisman
Jul 27, 2001
73,537
89,758
103
That line has been poor at 5v5, long before they put Kravstov on it. Trochek and Panarin have no chemistry. Kravstov’s defensive numbers are outstanding, but Trochek should be the goal scorer on the line and he is really slumping lately.

I have read from a few supposed insiders that Panarin has expressed that he is not comfortable with Chytil as his center. I think it is long past time to tell him “tough ****”. In the small amount of time Chytil and Panarin have been on the ice together they have been productive, and Chytil is wasted on the 3rd line between Goodrow and Vesey.

If nothing changes by the time Kreider and Gauthier come back, the lines should be:

Kreider/Mika/Kakko
Panarin/Chytil/Kravstov
Laf/Trochek/Gauthier
Goodrow/Brodzinski/Vesey

I’d send Laf down to Hartford before I’d put him on the 4th line, because at least he would get ice time to work on things in the AHL.
Laf has no inherent skills to work on
 

krup

Heisman
Feb 5, 2003
70,133
10,066
0
Laf has no inherent skills to work on
As I have mentioned a few times in this thread, he has had an awful year, but through the playoffs last year his even strength production was progressing nicely compared to most first overall picks.

The Junior tape I have seen of him, he wasn’t dominating because of physical skills like skating or a great shot. He was more like a Fox, where he appeared to have better vision of the game than the guys he was playing with and against.

I don’t see any of that now.
 

zappaa

Heisman
Jul 27, 2001
73,537
89,758
103
Off topic:
Am I the only one posting in this thread old enough to have vivid memories of the 1972 Summit Series between Canada and USSR ?
Phil Esposito, Alexander Yakushev and Valeri Kharlamov the best players on the ice
 

krup

Heisman
Feb 5, 2003
70,133
10,066
0
Off topic:
Am I the only one posting in this thread old enough to have vivid memories of the 1972 Summit Series between Canada and USSR ?
Phil Esposito, Alexander Yakushev and Valeri Kharlamov the best players on the ice
I was only 10 at the time and I remember that series happening, but not a lot of details like I do (for example) of the controversial 72 Olympics basketball final.

Did it get a lot of coverage in the US?

I have seen a couple of great documentaries and read a book on it. Combining that series with the games when the Russians came over around 1975 to play NHL teams and it is kind of embarrassing the impact that some players gooning it up had on being competitive with the Russians.
 

zappaa

Heisman
Jul 27, 2001
73,537
89,758
103
I was only 10 at the time and I remember that series happening, but not a lot of details like I do (for example) of the controversial 72 Olympics basketball final.

Did it get a lot of coverage in the US?

I have seen a couple of great documentaries and read a book on it. Combining that series with the games when the Russians came over around 1975 to play NHL teams and it is kind of embarrassing the impact that some players gooning it up had on being competitive with the Russians.
Every game was on TV Krup.
I was 15, a freshman and completely entrenched in my high school hockey, travel select, and going to hockey school for the 2nd half of every summer.
Espo won that series for us by himself, Orr was hurt…Paul Henderson right place right time
 

BigEastPhil

Heisman
Nov 25, 2007
18,659
12,650
66
Every game was on TV Krup.
I was 15, a freshman and completely entrenched in my high school hockey, travel select, and going to hockey school for the 2nd half of every summer.
Espo won that series for us by himself, Orr was hurt…Paul Henderson right place right time
Best of 8. Canada took Russians lightly. Canada went up 2-0 in first five minutes of game 1. Thought series would be a joke. Think Russia led series 2-1-1 after first 4 games in Canada. Think it was 3-1-1 Russia after game 5 and Canada won last 3 games with Paul Henderson of Leafs scoring winning goal with less than a minute to go in game 8. How’s my memory? Lol.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zappaa

miker183

All-Conference
Sep 13, 2014
2,847
2,191
0
Laf has no inherent skills to work on

If Kreider's absence is his audition, I think we have our answers about his future here.
He may still end up being a good player, but probably not with the Rangers, and, in my opinion, his draft projection was a huge miss.
 

krup

Heisman
Feb 5, 2003
70,133
10,066
0
If Kreider's absence is his audition, I think we have our answers about his future here.
He may still end up being a good player, but probably not with the Rangers, and, in my opinion, his draft projection was a huge miss.
At this point I would be fine with a Lafreniere trade. If he doesn’t play better for a new team at least we got something for him. If he did recover to play significantly better than he is on the Rangers it might force them to face what seems pretty obvious. The organization for decades has sucked at developing forward prospects.

Notable about Lafreniere’s draft projection is that he was the obvious number one a year before the draft, then things shut down so there wasn’t the year where scouts started noticing his flaws . Compare that to Shane Wright, who was also the consensus number one a year before his draft, then ended up going fourth after scouts didn’t like his predraft year as much.
 

RU Cheese

All-Conference
Sep 14, 2003
4,928
3,308
113
At this point I would be fine with a Lafreniere trade. If he doesn’t play better for a new team at least we got something for him. If he did recover to play significantly better than he is on the Rangers it might force them to face what seems pretty obvious. The organization for decades has sucked at developing forward prospects.

Notable about Lafreniere’s draft projection is that he was the obvious number one a year before the draft, then things shut down so there wasn’t the year where scouts started noticing his flaws . Compare that to Shane Wright, who was also the consensus number one a year before his draft, then ended up going fourth after scouts didn’t like his predraft year as much.
I'd be fine with moving Laf if it's a hockey trade. I hate deadline rentals and wouldn't want to move him (or really any kid) for a rental.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zappaa

zappaa

Heisman
Jul 27, 2001
73,537
89,758
103
I'd be fine with moving Laf if it's a hockey trade. I hate deadline rentals and wouldn't want to move him (or really any kid) for a rental.
I’d trade him for a rental yesterday Cheese.
You’re not losing a thing
Let’s see what he does again tonight, I’m not talking about getting his stick on a loose puck or a deflection, I’m talking make a play..
Kratsov invisible in the offensive zone also
 

TM94goRU

Heisman
Dec 12, 2020
14,915
13,474
113
Great come from behind win by the Devils. Tied it up with 9 seconds left, won in a shootout.

In overtime Tatar proved to be stronger than he looks 😆. Always nice to steal one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigEastPhil

Ronnie_B

Heisman
Dec 30, 2011
9,911
10,457
113
We didn't deserve those two points......but we're still going to run for the hills with them.
 

krup

Heisman
Feb 5, 2003
70,133
10,066
0
I’d trade him for a rental yesterday Cheese.
You’re not losing a thing
Let’s see what he does again tonight, I’m not talking about getting his stick on a loose puck or a deflection, I’m talking make a play..
Kratsov invisible in the offensive zone also
Zap, that would be just bad asset management. You know there are always teams who think they might be able to get more out of a player. Lafreniere would have decent trade value. Hell, the Canadians would probably still jump at the chance to get him.

The Rangers shouldn’t be going nuts with rentals this year. Third pair LD and some bottom six depth.