OT: 2022-23 NHL thread….Devils & Rangers & Islanders

zappaa

Heisman
Jul 27, 2001
73,537
89,758
103
With Mika and Strome now Trochek, he has never had a significant chance to be a top 6 center.

You should rest on your laurels about being right about Lafreniere, because you are really reaching in criticizing some of the other young players.
I enjoy talking hockey on here with you and the rest of the contributers in this thread.
I’m going to ignore this post by you and make believe it didn’t happen.
I definitely look forward to continuing our discussions, they’re fun
 

krup

Heisman
Feb 5, 2003
70,133
10,066
0
I enjoy talking hockey on here with you and the rest of the contributers in this thread.
I’m going to ignore this post by you and make believe it didn’t happen.
I definitely look forward to continuing our discussions, they’re fun
If I came across as nastier than I intended, I apologize. I just think you are letting how the Rangers handle their roster have too much impact on how good some of these young players appear.

Because they chose to short circuit the rebuild with Panarin and others, the young Rangers are blocked from significant power play time, and that is not common in the league. Power play points are what makes every player’s production look good.

There wouldn’t be so much talk about Meier if people thought of him only having 30 points right now , but that’s all he has without the power play. Cut his minutes to the less than 14 Chytil gets and his production wouldn’t be much different than Chytil’s either.

Meier is really good, and will help anyone who gets him, but I don’t want the Rangers to pay a ton get a point per game RW so soon after they gave away a point per game RW for a horrible return, and especially to “go for it” in a year where Shesty isn’t playing well enough to carry them like he did last year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zappaa

zappaa

Heisman
Jul 27, 2001
73,537
89,758
103
Well Krup,
To your point, Chytil centering Laf and Goodrow it seems tonight.
Not much there to create offense.
You can argue Vecey has more offensive skills than Goody.
Either way, Chytil goals will be about individual effort or set up by a defenseman
 

krup

Heisman
Feb 5, 2003
70,133
10,066
0
Well Krup,
To your point, Chytil centering Laf and Goodrow it seems tonight.
Not much there to create offense.
You can argue Vecey has more offensive skills than Goody.
Either way, Chytil goals will be about individual effort or set up by a defenseman
Boston made the Islander power play look bad last night. The Ranger pp1 has become so predictable teams let them keep possession because they know if they stop the Zibanejad one timer the Rangers are out of ideas.

It would be nice if we had a coach who knew how to make adjustments beyond mixing up line combinations.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zappaa

zappaa

Heisman
Jul 27, 2001
73,537
89,758
103
Boston made the Islander power play look bad last night. The Ranger pp1 has become so predictable teams let them keep possession because they know if they stop the Zibanejad one timer the Rangers are out of ideas.

It would be nice if we had a coach who knew how to make adjustments beyond mixing up line combinations.
Shoot it, Bread and Fox are both guilty of constantly taking it wide
 

zappaa

Heisman
Jul 27, 2001
73,537
89,758
103
Rangers continue to skate themselves out of shooting positions.
Fox leading the pack
 

krup

Heisman
Feb 5, 2003
70,133
10,066
0
Gallant should fired during the second intermission for refusing to take advantage of home ice by matching lines.

The Rangers 3rd line has a good shift, keeps possession CC against the Bruins 1st line for a while until a Bruins’ icing. So faced with a gassed Bruins team, down 2-0 and really needing a goal, Gallant sends out the 4th line.

The only moves Gallant makes as a coach is incessantly mixing up the lines, playing veteran AHL level players over much higher ceiling young players, and punishing young players for the same mistakes his favorites make over and over.
 

Ronnie_B

Heisman
Dec 30, 2011
9,911
10,457
113
My God does Blackwood blow.........you got to stop that OT goal.

Gutsy effort nonetheless by the team, got a point at the end. Good to see Bastian back in the lineup.
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: Proud NJ Sports Fan

zappaa

Heisman
Jul 27, 2001
73,537
89,758
103
Let's not forget how bad of a year Panarin is having.
Fanning, taking all day to shoot, constantly missing the net and not shooting at all.
Dude has 12 goals and a minus 5.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RU Cheese

krup

Heisman
Feb 5, 2003
70,133
10,066
0
Let's not forget how bad of a year Panarin is having.
Fanning, taking all day to shoot, constantly missing the net and not shooting at all.
Dude has 12 goals and a minus 5.
Huge amount of turnovers as well. He can’t get it through his head that teams expect him to try that cross ice pass though 2-3 defenders and usually stop it easily now.

I would be at least asking whether he still wants to play in Florida. I know he still has a lot of production, but his overall numbers are starting to regress in the last two seasons and Florida may be desperate because they have a big fight just to make the playoffs.
 

zappaa

Heisman
Jul 27, 2001
73,537
89,758
103
Huge amount of turnovers as well. He can’t get it through his head that teams expect him to try that cross ice pass though 2-3 defenders and usually stop it easily now.

I would be at least asking whether he still wants to play in Florida. I know he still has a lot of production, but his overall numbers are starting to regress in the last two seasons and Florida may be desperate because they have a big fight just to make the playoffs.
He’s got way to much left in him in my opinion.
So gifted and incredibly strong on the puck for his size.
Kreider for all his intangibles, strong shot, size and speed…has a very low hockey IQ and borders on being soft on the puck…strong on his skates in front of the net, but his physicality level along the walls is embarrassing for his size
 

krup

Heisman
Feb 5, 2003
70,133
10,066
0
He’s got way to much left in him in my opinion.
So gifted and incredibly strong on the puck for his size.
Kreider for all his intangibles, strong shot, size and speed…has a very low hockey IQ and borders on being soft on the puck…strong on his skates in front of the net, but his physicality level along the walls is embarrassing for his size
No doubt Panarin is still really good, but that is why you could trade him (only if he wanted to go with his NMC of course). I would be fine with either one going (I wanted Kreider traded instead of resigned the first time).

You would get in return the asset capital to acquire Meier, and have the cap space to keep him.

The team would be much more balanced, and since Meier is only 26 he fits much better with what should be the real timeline of the team.

The problem with trading Kreider is that the team he might want to waive his NMC to go to (Boston) probably doesn’t want him for the reasons you mentioned concerning his play.
 
May 11, 2010
72,487
56,950
0
An undeserved point but you take ‘em

Blackwood held them in it when they were severely outplayed for long stretches

Sure the overtime goal allowed was soft but the shooter is a goal scorer and he had a good look

2nd straight game the Devils scored with the extra attacker.
 

Ronnie_B

Heisman
Dec 30, 2011
9,911
10,457
113
Kreider would be a scary fit with the Bruins, if they can make Zacha look like a Top 6 forward, imagine what Kreider would do.
 

TM94goRU

Heisman
Dec 12, 2020
14,915
13,474
113
An undeserved point but you take ‘em

Blackwood held them in it when they were severely outplayed for long stretches

Sure the overtime goal allowed was soft but the shooter is a goal scorer and he had a good look

2nd straight game the Devils scored with the extra attacker.
Even with a disappointing effort we took 9 of 10 points. Deserved to lose as the team looked tired. That said, don't forget about "home cooking", go back and look, then count how many seconds elapsed between Blackwood getting run over and then the GW goal. Hint it is not long. I'm not saying it is a penalty, but I would have liked the game to be stopped there for a minute i.e. a whistle.

If it is a good play now, the NJD should emulate it in any future OT. It is either that or the zebras missed it the way they earlier missed the baseball swing that got rid of Bratt's stick on a rush. Of course they are human and prone to mistakes.
 

robcac26

All-Conference
Nov 30, 2012
2,981
2,614
83
Even with a disappointing effort we took 9 of 10 points. Deserved to lose as the team looked tired. That said, don't forget about "home cooking", go back and look, then count how many seconds elapsed between Blackwood getting run over and then the GW goal. Hint it is not long. I'm not saying it is a penalty, but I would have liked the game to be stopped there for a minute i.e. a whistle.

If it is a good play now, the NJD should emulate it in any future OT. It is either that or the zebras missed it the way they earlier missed the baseball swing that got rid of Bratt's stick on a rush. Of course they are human and prone to mistakes.
Dude come on. It was 16 seconds between the time Blackwood got up and the shot going on. That didn't interfere with his ability to make a save whatsoever, there's nothing in the rules that say play is blown dead for incidental contact with a goalie. If that were the case, there would be a lot more stoppages and for no reason. Now if the goal were scored before he was able to get back up and be ready to make a save it would be disallowed, but that is not at all what happened here.
 

TM94goRU

Heisman
Dec 12, 2020
14,915
13,474
113
Dude come on. It was 16 seconds between the time Blackwood got up and the shot going on. That didn't interfere with his ability to make a save whatsoever, there's nothing in the rules that say play is blown dead for incidental contact with a goalie. If that were the case, there would be a lot more stoppages and for no reason. Now if the goal were scored before he was able to get back up and be ready to make a save it would be disallowed, but that is not at all what happened here.
Okay, then it should become strategy! The Devils should also teach their goalies to knock the net off it's moorings in any type of similar situation. The camera didn't catch the whole thing, but Blackwood was completely down with a Kracken player on top of him. I have seen a whistle for much less. That is all I'm saying because of the hate coming Blackwood's way.

More over remember I said they played tired and deserved to lose. I think maybe this leads them to buckle down and not get behind as often early. I was not knocking your beloved ref's. We all make mistakes, I wouldn't want robots.
 

RU Cheese

All-Conference
Sep 14, 2003
4,928
3,308
113
No doubt Panarin is still really good, but that is why you could trade him (only if he wanted to go with his NMC of course). I would be fine with either one going (I wanted Kreider traded instead of resigned the first time).

You would get in return the asset capital to acquire Meier, and have the cap space to keep him.

The team would be much more balanced, and since Meier is only 26 he fits much better with what should be the real timeline of the team.

The problem with trading Kreider is that the team he might want to waive his NMC to go to (Boston) probably doesn’t want him for the reasons you mentioned concerning his play.
I'd be fine moving Panarin. I don't know what, if anything, happened to him last year but he has been no where close to the guy that first signed here. He's far too predictable and is no where near what he needs to be for his cap hit.

Kreider is tougher one. I also wanted to trade him, but last year he showed you what he's capable of when it comes together. He's always been incredibly streaky and inconsistent - his size, speed and hands should put him at 40 goals annually - but never does. His number is more manageable and is a huge leadership guy (could be viewed good or bad) in the room.
 

krup

Heisman
Feb 5, 2003
70,133
10,066
0
I'd be fine moving Panarin. I don't know what, if anything, happened to him last year but he has been no where close to the guy that first signed here. He's far too predictable and is no where near what he needs to be for his cap hit.

Kreider is tougher one. I also wanted to trade him, but last year he showed you what he's capable of when it comes together. He's always been incredibly streaky and inconsistent - his size, speed and hands should put him at 40 goals annually - but never does. His number is more manageable and is a huge leadership guy (could be viewed good or bad) in the room.
I would prefer moving Panarin because he would have more value and we could free up a lot more cap (even if we had to retain a little).

I agree Kreider appears to offer more intangibles, and I would be okay with just he and Mika growing old together while the rest of the team was much younger. Also, Kreider signed a relatively team friendly deal while Panarin bled every penny out of the Rangers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RU Cheese

zappaa

Heisman
Jul 27, 2001
73,537
89,758
103
Krup
I agree with Brooks’s newest article in the Post.
Chytil was by far our best center on the ice last night against a strong team.
It’s time for him to replace Trochek on the second line and see what he can do.
To bad if Bread doesn’t like it, it’s not his decision
 
Last edited:

krup

Heisman
Feb 5, 2003
70,133
10,066
0
Krup
I agree with Brooks’s newest article in the Post.
Chytil was by far our best center on the ice last night again a strong team.
It’s time for him to replace Trochek on the second line and see what he can do.
To bad if Bread doesn’t like it, it’s not his decision
I couldn’t agree with that move more. I don’t get Panarin’s issue with Chytil, because in the short times they have been on the ice together they have looked good. He and Trochek just haven’t clicked.

I would also put Kravstov back on the right of that line, because he has looked good with Chytil and, despite what Gallant thinks, his defensive numbers are as good as Vesey’s.
 

Ronnie_B

Heisman
Dec 30, 2011
9,911
10,457
113
I couldn’t agree with that move more. I don’t get Panarin’s issue with Chytil, because in the short times they have been on the ice together they have looked good. He and Trochek just haven’t clicked.

I would also put Kravstov back on the right of that line, because he has looked good with Chytil and, despite what Gallant thinks, his defensive numbers are as good as Vesey’s.
Panarin has an issue playing with Chytil?
 

krup

Heisman
Feb 5, 2003
70,133
10,066
0
Panarin has an issue playing with Chytil?
Not publicly, but I have read on a few different sites from a few different sources who claim to be insiders that Panarin does not feel their games are a fit and preferred Strome and now Trochek (I never read that he had any personal issue with Chytil).
 

zappaa

Heisman
Jul 27, 2001
73,537
89,758
103
Kreider would be a scary fit with the Bruins, if they can make Zacha look like a Top 6 forward, imagine what Kreider would do.
He’d still play with one hand on his stick, hit no one along the walls and have a low hockey IQ…
I’m not sure he’d fit in given the commitment to physicality the Bruins demand.
 
Last edited:

robcac26

All-Conference
Nov 30, 2012
2,981
2,614
83
Okay, then it should become strategy! The Devils should also teach their goalies to knock the net off it's moorings in any type of similar situation. The camera didn't catch the whole thing, but Blackwood was completely down with a Kracken player on top of him. I have seen a whistle for much less. That is all I'm saying because of the hate coming Blackwood's way.

More over remember I said they played tired and deserved to lose. I think maybe this leads them to buckle down and not get behind as often early. I was not knocking your beloved ref's. We all make mistakes, I wouldn't want robots.
It was extremely obvious to anyone who isn't looking for a reason to complain that Bjorkstrand tripped over Bratt's skate and inadvertently slid into Blackwood as a result. That isn't a whistle unless the puck goes into the net. Both of your suggestions are penalties. Your frequent whining about the refs is getting old, the only thing that possibly could have been blown on that play was maybe a soft tripping call on Bratt. None of the Devils including Blackwood himself, or the coaching staff took issue with the play continuing. Nice subtle move by Burakovsky to pull the puck towards his body and change the angle of the shot, but Blackwood probably should still make that save, and Bratt probably gave him too much space that allowed him to get that shot off clean.

 

RU Cheese

All-Conference
Sep 14, 2003
4,928
3,308
113
Not publicly, but I have read on a few different sites from a few different sources who claim to be insiders that Panarin does not feel their games are a fit and preferred Strome and now Trochek (I never read that he had any personal issue with Chytil).
That's the other problem with Panarin. When you're an $11M / year player, you should be producing with Dan Boyle as your center.

I know that was a thing with Jagr, but Panarin ain't Jagr.
 

zappaa

Heisman
Jul 27, 2001
73,537
89,758
103
That's the other problem with Panarin. When you're an $11M / year player, you should be producing with Dan Boyle as your center.

I know that was a thing with Jagr, but Panarin ain't Jagr.
12 goals is borderline pathetic for a player of his skills
 

rudad02

All-American
Nov 7, 2010
8,853
5,773
0
For you Rangers fans. How many of you remember "Leapin Lou" Fortinato, Andy Bathgate, Dean Prentice, Larry Popein, Harry "the Horse" Howell, or Gump Worsley. As a boy in Brooklyn used to listen to these guys & the Rangers on the radio. Devils fan now after watching the River Rats while living in Albany & now in NJ.
 
Last edited: