OT: Record-high ocean temperatures to make hurricane season more active

Status
Not open for further replies.
Jan 12, 2015
36,914
36,767
113
Apparently you don’t know how time stamps work.

You really are dumber than anyone gave you credit for. Might need to add an extra expletive when calling you dumb as ****ing rock, like this “****ing dumb as a ****ing rock”.

One curse doesn’t convey the level of stupidity appropriately.
Wow you're having an epic meltdown diddiot--worse than during your everyday CE beatdowns.

So tell us how your post with a timestamp from yesterday relates to my post with a timestamp from last Thursday? Geez you've proven how bad you are at math, but this is a new low for your stupidity. LMAO

 
  • Like
Reactions: Proud NJ Sports Fan
May 11, 2010
72,487
56,950
0
Wow you're having an epic meltdown diddiot--worse than during your everyday CE beatdowns.

So tell us how your post with a timestamp from yesterday relates to my post with a timestamp from last Thursday? Geez you've proven how bad you are at math, but this is a new low for your stupidity. LMAO

He’s unemployed and methed up
Hopeless hypocrite
 
Last edited:

RUDiddy777

Heisman
Feb 26, 2015
33,022
37,436
113
Wow you're having an epic meltdown diddiot--worse than during your everyday CE beatdowns.

So tell us how your post with a timestamp from yesterday relates to my post with a timestamp from last Thursday? Geez you've proven how bad you are at math, but this is a new low for your stupidity. LMAO


So I guess you don’t know how time stamps work.
 

BossNJ

All-American
Oct 6, 2020
9,678
8,403
113
In other words, no - you can't show any evidence that the government forced you to get a vaccine, you're talking out your poor *** as usual and think everyone else is to blame for the fact that your ex-wife cleaned out what little you had and now you're just a failed, old drunk with no prospects left, save a really long nap.

Godspeed.
Ouch that hurt 😂😂😂
 
  • Like
Reactions: NotInRHouse

GoodOl'Rutgers

Heisman
Sep 11, 2006
123,974
19,585
0
a covid vaccine that does not prevent catching or spreading..no
You also have proven tested vaccines vs.. what? Salesjob by Big Pharma. Big payday for big pharma. Oh no, don't use the cheap and available ivermectin.. wait for our unproven vaccines that will maybe cause myocarditis in the young. And pay us.. and make us immune to legal recourse when we F this up and LIE to the world.
 

fsg2_rivals

Heisman
Apr 3, 2018
10,881
13,184
0
You also have proven tested vaccines vs.. what? Salesjob by Big Pharma. Big payday for big pharma. Oh no, don't use the cheap and available ivermectin.. wait for our unproven vaccines that will maybe cause myocarditis in the young. And pay us.. and make us immune to legal recourse when we F this up and LIE to the world.

What is, a bunch of Covid truther conspiracy theories all rolled up in one unhinged and poorly written paragraph?
 

rurichdog

Heisman
Sep 30, 2006
116,807
14,389
0
LOL. Doing what?

You were free to lock up Hillary, Hunter or anyone else.

Instead, under the party you worship's DOJ, multiple GOP congressmen and Trump's campaign manager were indicted.

Maybe your party should stop committing so many crimes, and accusing everyone of what you've done.

The leader of YOUR PARTY stole Classified info. Not Hillary.

The leader of YOUR PARTY took millions from China and his son in law, who he appointed to a job, took BILLIONS from the Saudis. Not Hunter.

But let's not stop there.

Surely, as the proud advocate of the party of Gym Jordan, Hastert, and Trump himself, you have comments about grooming and child trafficking? Maybe Trump can appoint the prosecutor who let off Epstein to look into it like he did his own cabinet.
It's almost like 1996 never happened...that whole Chinese influence over U.S. politics through illegal financing Clinton's campaign. Or those FBI files just magically appeared in the First Lady's nightstand in 1993...must have been the maid. Was she constitutionally allowed to have those files? How many billions were laundered through the Clinton Foundation again?

I know. "But Trump" and "But MAGA". Stay focused on your words above.
 

Kbee3

Heisman
Aug 23, 2002
43,724
35,255
0
In other words, no - you can't show any evidence that the government forced you to get a vaccine, you're talking out your poor *** as usual and think everyone else is to blame for the fact that your ex-wife cleaned out what little you had and now you're just a failed, old drunk with no prospects left, save a really long nap.

Godspeed.
Ouch.
That's gotta leave a mark.
 

bac2therac

Hall of Famer
Jul 30, 2001
238,741
168,483
113

fsg2_rivals

Heisman
Apr 3, 2018
10,881
13,184
0

RU848789

Heisman
Jul 27, 2001
64,385
43,487
113
You also have proven tested vaccines vs.. what? Salesjob by Big Pharma. Big payday for big pharma. Oh no, don't use the cheap and available ivermectin.. wait for our unproven vaccines that will maybe cause myocarditis in the young. And pay us.. and make us immune to legal recourse when we F this up and LIE to the world.
You always struck me as someone who had a decent working knowledge of science and logic and I recall awhile back that you seemed to think the vaccines were safe and effective. Maybe I'm misremembering, but if not, it's disappointing to see you having fallen victim to the antivaxx and ivermectin misinformation machines. The COVID vaccines will be remembered by the vast majority of medical researchers and doctors as one of the biggest, most important breakthrough in the history of medicine, given how safe and effective they've been (especially in protecting against severe COVID/death) and how amazingly quickly they were developed and tested (and yes, the Trump Administration deserves kudos for Warp Speed), saving 2MM+ lives in the US and tens of millions worldwide. One can debate the effectiveness of mandates, but not the effectiveness of the vaccines. If we didn't have these vaccines in place, especially when the incredibly infectious omicron variants hit, our country and much of the world would've been broken, as the impact would've been far worse than what we saw with the original strain.

https://www.statnews.com/2022/02/14/why-covid-19-vaccines-are-a-freaking-miracle/

And the ivermectin case, in particular, kind of destroys your "big Pharma bad" logic here. Specifically, it absolutely has no efficacy for COVID, as I and a couple of MDs in the linked thread have shown (and much of this was well known 2 years ago). Secondly, Merck stood to gain substantially, financially, if iermectin worked for COVID, but Merck came out with crystal clear statements summarizing how ivermectin was ineffective for COVID (and could be dangerous when the animal formulations were used by humans, as has occurred). Also, it's not like Merck had COVID vaccines that it didn't want ivermectin competing with. As I've said many times, having worked on ivermectin in the late 80s/early 90s, I would have been thrilled if it worked for COVID. It doesn't. Also, anyone who says that there was a bias against repurposing existing medications (like HCQ and ivermectin) hasn't been paying attention, since dexamethasone an old steroid was approved for use in patients suffering from COVID-induced inflammation, as it worked very well for that. And is pretty cheap.

https://rutgers.forums.rivals.com/threads/bronny-james-cardiac-arrest.263289/post-6404803
 
May 11, 2010
72,487
56,950
0
You always struck me as someone who had a decent working knowledge of science and logic and I recall awhile back that you seemed to think the vaccines were safe and effective. Maybe I'm misremembering, but if not, it's disappointing to see you having fallen victim to the antivaxx and ivermectin misinformation machines. The COVID vaccines will be remembered by the vast majority of medical researchers and doctors as one of the biggest, most important breakthrough in the history of medicine, given how safe and effective they've been (especially in protecting against severe COVID/death) and how amazingly quickly they were developed and tested (and yes, the Trump Administration deserves kudos for Warp Speed), saving 2MM+ lives in the US and tens of millions worldwide. One can debate the effectiveness of mandates, but not the effectiveness of the vaccines. If we didn't have these vaccines in place, especially when the incredibly infectious omicron variants hit, our country and much of the world would've been broken, as the impact would've been far worse than what we saw with the original strain.

https://www.statnews.com/2022/02/14/why-covid-19-vaccines-are-a-freaking-miracle/

And the ivermectin case, in particular, kind of destroys your "big Pharma bad" logic here. Specifically, it absolutely has no efficacy for COVID, as I and a couple of MDs in the linked thread have shown (and much of this was well known 2 years ago). Secondly, Merck stood to gain substantially, financially, if iermectin worked for COVID, but Merck came out with crystal clear statements summarizing how ivermectin was ineffective for COVID (and could be dangerous when the animal formulations were used by humans, as has occurred). Also, it's not like Merck had COVID vaccines that it didn't want ivermectin competing with. As I've said many times, having worked on ivermectin in the late 80s/early 90s, I would have been thrilled if it worked for COVID. It doesn't. Also, anyone who says that there was a bias against repurposing existing medications (like HCQ and ivermectin) hasn't been paying attention, since dexamethasone an old steroid was approved for use in patients suffering from COVID-induced inflammation, as it worked very well for that. And is pretty cheap.

https://rutgers.forums.rivals.com/threads/bronny-james-cardiac-arrest.263289/post-6404803
So NOT true
 
May 11, 2010
72,487
56,950
0
Like you would know. Tell everyone where you get your knowledge of Covid and the vaccines from.

Chocolate Mm GIF by M&M's UK
 

ashokan

Heisman
May 3, 2011
25,325
19,686
0
Yeah, like you.

You didn't have to get vaxxed for work at all, the whole basis of your phony backdoor "mandate" complaint.

Fake, outdated news. Time to move on, nerd-o.


Of course many working people and military were ordered to take vaxx or else. OSHA was strictest with employers with 100+ employees but a lot of smaller employers adopted the same policies.

Even Rutgers told employees to get vaxxed or else - and it emphasized that as a federal contractor it had give people the business



.

 

fsg2_rivals

Heisman
Apr 3, 2018
10,881
13,184
0
Of course many working people and military were ordered to take vaxx or else. OSHA was strictest with employers with 100+ employees but a lot of smaller employers adopted the same policies.

Even Rutgers told employees to get vaxxed or else - and it emphasized that as a federal contractor it had give people the business



.


I wasn't asking about "people."

I was asking bac directly. I'll loop you in, too - feel free to answer on your own behalf.

If you're going to complain about shadow mandates for three years, they should probably have affected you at some point.
 

brgRC90

Heisman
Apr 8, 2008
34,957
15,859
0
You always struck me as someone who had a decent working knowledge of science and logic and I recall awhile back that you seemed to think the vaccines were safe and effective. Maybe I'm misremembering, but if not, it's disappointing to see you having fallen victim to the antivaxx and ivermectin misinformation machines. The COVID vaccines will be remembered by the vast majority of medical researchers and doctors as one of the biggest, most important breakthrough in the history of medicine, given how safe and effective they've been (especially in protecting against severe COVID/death) and how amazingly quickly they were developed and tested (and yes, the Trump Administration deserves kudos for Warp Speed), saving 2MM+ lives in the US and tens of millions worldwide. One can debate the effectiveness of mandates, but not the effectiveness of the vaccines. If we didn't have these vaccines in place, especially when the incredibly infectious omicron variants hit, our country and much of the world would've been broken, as the impact would've been far worse than what we saw with the original strain.

https://www.statnews.com/2022/02/14/why-covid-19-vaccines-are-a-freaking-miracle/

And the ivermectin case, in particular, kind of destroys your "big Pharma bad" logic here. Specifically, it absolutely has no efficacy for COVID, as I and a couple of MDs in the linked thread have shown (and much of this was well known 2 years ago). Secondly, Merck stood to gain substantially, financially, if iermectin worked for COVID, but Merck came out with crystal clear statements summarizing how ivermectin was ineffective for COVID (and could be dangerous when the animal formulations were used by humans, as has occurred). Also, it's not like Merck had COVID vaccines that it didn't want ivermectin competing with. As I've said many times, having worked on ivermectin in the late 80s/early 90s, I would have been thrilled if it worked for COVID. It doesn't. Also, anyone who says that there was a bias against repurposing existing medications (like HCQ and ivermectin) hasn't been paying attention, since dexamethasone an old steroid was approved for use in patients suffering from COVID-induced inflammation, as it worked very well for that. And is pretty cheap.

https://rutgers.forums.rivals.com/threads/bronny-james-cardiac-arrest.263289/popost-6404803a
And isn't it amazing how people whining about side effects from a vaccine seem to think a drug like ivermectin--or any of the other drugs you might get during a hospital stay with covid--wouldn't have any side effects? Or that getting a bad infection wouldn't have lingering health problems, which it sometimes does? Cognitive dissonance. They wedded themselves to the anti-vaxxer idea and so have to perform all kinds of logical pretzel twisting for it to make sense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RU848789 and pmvon
May 11, 2010
72,487
56,950
0
I wasn't asking about "people."

I was asking bac directly. I'll loop you in, too - feel free to answer on your own behalf.

If you're going to complain about shadow mandates for three years, they should probably have affected you at some point.

There should never have been any mandates

Why are you against my body my choice?
 
May 11, 2010
72,487
56,950
0
And isn't it amazing how people whining about side effects from a vaccine seem to think a drug like ivermectin--or any of the other drugs you might get during a hospital stay with covid--wouldn't have any side effects? Or that getting a bad infection wouldn't have lingering health problems, which it sometimes does? Cognitive dissonance. They wedded themselves to the anti-vaxxer idea and so have to perform all kinds of logical pretzel twisting for it to make sense.

No one can be anti-vaxx with CV.

They still don’t have a vaccine for it.

You wedd yourself to an misnomer term which was politically manufactured
 

brgRC90

Heisman
Apr 8, 2008
34,957
15,859
0
No one can be anti-vaxx with CV.

They still don’t have a vaccine for it.

You wedd yourself to an misnomer term which was politically manufactured
You don't seem to realize what a vaccine is or that there are different kinds, including therapeutic vaccines for cancer that train the immune system to fight cancer AFTER it has already appeared.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Proud NJ Sports Fan
Status
Not open for further replies.