Lol and you respond exactly as I said you do. We're all really impressed by you, we really are junior. Here's a cookie.
OT: Record-high ocean temperatures to make hurricane season more active
- Thread starter Morrischiano2
- Start date
- Status
The same cast of characters who seem completely unable to disassociate their political bias from analytical thought and argument. Pathetic.
Why is this thread posted on the football board and nor Current Events.
I wish the moderators would remove unrelated and OT threads.
I wish the moderators would remove unrelated and OT threads.
There should be a connection to Rutgers Football or college football
The back & forth insults in a lot of these non football threads are a turnoff
The deadlines are driven by the carbon budget. We have about 500 GT of emissions that can be released before we exceed 1.5 - 2 C of temp rise. We are actually seeing what a 1.5 C world looks like due to El Niño (obviously exclusive of the aggregated impacts of further warming (droughts, biodiversity loss, etc as well as tipping points such as the Gulf Stream collapse 4Real mentioned earlier).
This is a function of radiative forcing. Each GHG makes various contributions to radiative forcing. CO2 is the most abundant and most substitutable - things like the PFCs and HFCs, which are nominal but as much as 24,000x more potent at trapping heat, don’t have a really good substitute given their role in refrigeration.
Globally, we release about 50 gigatons annually… so at our current pace, we have 10 years before the budget is consumed.
Not possible to fully decarbonize on that timeline, so there are incremental targets based on the availability of technology. Things like power generation are relatively easy. Decarbonizing cement, marine transport, aviation, agriculture (fertilizers) are much more difficult and will take longer.
You can find the IEA energy models here:
Thought you guys were against censorship, right?
It’s tagged as OT. There are a lot of smart people on this board who should be able to engage in discussion and the sharing of ideas about what is and will continue to be the most important topic for the economy and the species for the next 50 years and beyond.
You know what the damn shame of all this is?….the u.s has the richest and most abundant supplies of fossil fuels on earth and our country isn’t profiting at all because of the insanity coming from the left.
Of course it does. Lock Trump also, but you'll NEVER hear that when it comes to Liberals as our country to ****
The US is effectively energy independent and profits from a variety of fuel export. The energy complex is generating massive profits today. What are you talking about? You just say stuff that has no basis in reality or fact.
A guy who says America isn't profiting from fossil fuels is a joke that can't be taken seriously.
You mean like $196 billion in profits in one year?
This does not include the E&Ps like Pioneer or the MLPs like Enterprise or the natural gas focused groups like Range.
He didnt do anything - but was still compelled to resign by his peers.
Anyway, I shouldnt have responded to the previous post.
Stop whining Alice. To paraphrase an old but true saying, if you can't take it don't start dishing it out.
It doesn't include a lot of stuff. I know people sometimes exaggerate during political discussions but to say we're not benefitting is just full on idiocy. It's a huge industry with tons of money and natural gas is a lot cheaper here than most places in the world because of all the drilling. Some people really are in cuckoo land.
One trick pony. Here's a suggestion: try intelligent discussion of issues for once.
Wrong. Every time you babies are faced with facts or contrary opinions, your panties get in a bunch and you lash out like little girls. Just see diddles this thread. Then of course there's ru4BleemClown wishing death on anyone that disagrees with him.
So you respond with more juvenile insults lol
Since you brought up the importance of facts in having a discussion, I figured I would aggregate your contributions to the conversation to identify the facts that you presented.
It seems the only fact presented is that you're an imbecile.
** it seems there's a limit to how much stupidity can be contained in a post... so it limited the number of quoted responses.
Poor stalker, weak attempt at more garbage insults; try again with the posts those were replying to. I'll make it quick with a couple factual posts here that sent you into a tizzy of weak insults and dumbass lies, and ultimately crying for the mods lol.
Yawn. So what about Rutgers 1st game of the season. Who is going? Will it be cancelled due to excessive heat. LOL
We could be doing so much more! It’s not like the Biden regime isn’t sending tens of billions of our taxpayer dollars to a foreign country or allowing millions of third world illegals into the country or anything.
Is Biden seeking to raise oil output from SA and Venezuela and others, yes. Just like every president has for the last 70 years. You know, trying to get energy prices down. You are probably complaining about high energy prices that are Bidens fault while simultaneously complaining about him trying to lower prices.
US energy production is at an all time high and US exports of energy are at an all time high. This has been written numerous times in this thread.
So no they aren’t facts, there are kernels of truth wrapped in biased opinion. There are no facts to support your claim that Biden is trying to shut down US fossil fuel industry. Over time, they want to switch to renewables just like everyone else that isn’t Saudi Arabia or Russia.
Two Princeton, MIT Scientists Say EPA Climate Regulations Based On A 'Hoax'
https://www.zerohedge.com/political...ntists-say-epa-climate-regulations-based-hoax
Thank you for finding two scientists that disagree.
You already know this, for others benefit, he’s also providing lots of incentives for them to change their business models. DAC investments that should help support the upstream component. Hydrogen tax credits for downstream.
Great interview with Greenpeace co-founder
ALL sensible and honest people get badjacketed by the kooks
Its a badgte of honor to get swarmed by the "fact-checkers" these days
"Bad-jacketing is a term for planting doubt on the authenticity of an individual's bona fides or identity. An example would be creating suspicion through spreading false rumors, manufacturing evidence, etc."
Yawn. So what about Rutgers 1st game of the season. Who is going? Will it be cancelled due to excessive heat. LOL
A prerequisite for engaging in discussion on climate change is knowing the difference between weather and climate. It appears you don’t meet that threshold.
Huge undersea volcacno erupted this year
"This massive subsea volcanic event appears to have elevated the absolute amount of water vapor in the upper atmosphere by some 11%. As high as the mesosphere and into space. Huge ejection. This May last for up to ten years. This added water vapor encircled the earth within several months of eruption. Water vapor (the other “greenhouse gas” according to environmentalists ) is 63X more prevalent in the upper atmosphere than Co2. This single event would have a major impact on warming the entire Pacific Ocean by several degrees, and on northern hemisphere temps."
"This massive subsea volcanic event appears to have elevated the absolute amount of water vapor in the upper atmosphere by some 11%. As high as the mesosphere and into space. Huge ejection. This May last for up to ten years. This added water vapor encircled the earth within several months of eruption. Water vapor (the other “greenhouse gas” according to environmentalists ) is 63X more prevalent in the upper atmosphere than Co2. This single event would have a major impact on warming the entire Pacific Ocean by several degrees, and on northern hemisphere temps."
Actually we couldn't be. Oil companies have lots of wells they could drill but don't because oversupply reduces their profits. They're not particularly interested in giving you low prices.
- Status