OT: Stock and Investment Thread

Oct 19, 2010
176,672
21,529
0
Let's just hope the NVDIA plants comes to fruition (won't happen overnight) unlike the FOXCONN plant that was supposed to be brought back to Indiana or Wisc (I forget which) but never materialized.

One of the problems with the Foxconn plant was the lack of supportive industries and skilled worker in that part of the country. Arizona and Texas may be better-suited to to the high-tech companies as lower-cost alternatives to places like Silicon Valley and Massachusetts.
 

drewbagel423

Well-known member
Oct 30, 2006
5,698
1,995
113
Let's just hope the NVDIA plants comes to fruition (won't happen overnight) unlike the FOXCONN plant that was supposed to be brought back to Indiana or Wisc (I forget which) but never materialized.
Just like the INTC factory in Ohio that was delayed from 2025 to 2027 now to 2032.
 

rurahrah000

Active member
Aug 21, 2010
3,140
2,095
88
Yeah, I'm going to trust the people actually collecting the tariffs over Trump. Chips are exempt from China's 2,000% tariffs or whatever they are now. Besides, most semis come from Taiwan so I guess it doesn't matter anyway.
So... we are now not going to listen to Trump?
 

AntiG_RU

New member
Jan 27, 2012
4,465
3,526
0
One of the problems with the Foxconn plant was the lack of supportive industries and skilled worker in that part of the country. Arizona and Texas may be better-suited to to the high-tech companies as lower-cost alternatives to places like Silicon Valley and Massachusetts.
yeah TSMC is starting up in Arizona, they just completed the property surveys and documentation there not too long ago. This has tremendous geopolitical impact not only economically but in terms of staving off WW3 because US and Taiwan will continue to have increased ties in terms of national and international security, and each country will be able to co-opt high tech chips for government security for the US without risk of supply-chain fall-out on a future sanction of China (as well as potential trojan horses that the CCP could program into Chinese manufactured chips). Its a huge thing for the 4 barriers of the Pacific (Taiwan, Japan, South Korea, Philippines) who rely on the US to defend against CCP aggression. The other key there will be South Korea's June election where they have a CCP plant running as the opposition party.
 

bigbirdRU

New member
Mar 6, 2010
2,244
310
0
DOn't know if you guy watch/listen to teh All-In podcast but this one posted Saturday on Youtube was heated on this general topic. It was a fun watch... warning.. it is long.. 2 hrs total and most is on-topic.. maybe play at 1.25X or faster? Chamath is the MVP of this debate.

The Great Tariff Debate with David Sacks, Larry Summers, and Ezra Klein​


Not a huge fan of Ezra Kleins politics but I felt David and Chamath still dodged his question. How do we decide if these decisions worked? How many factories opened in rust belt, middle class manufacturing jobs actual reshore? Where is GDP, unemployment, stock market in 3 years?
 

Rutgers Chris

Well-known member
Nov 29, 2005
3,916
4,392
97
Not a huge fan of Ezra Kleins politics but I felt David and Chamath still dodged his question. How do we decide if these decisions worked? How many factories opened in rust belt, middle class manufacturing jobs actual reshore? Where is GDP, unemployment, stock market in 3 years?
I just listened to this exact exchange. In Sacks’ defense he was cut off 11 times so he wasnt going to give in to an answer stubbornly at that point.

I thought Chamath was pretty clear in citing measuring improvements in the supply chain of technology, energy, material inputs/rare earths and pharma. Definitely didn’t nail it down to a measurable kpi to your point
 

GoodOl'Rutgers

New member
Sep 11, 2006
124,023
19,602
0
Not a huge fan of Ezra Kleins politics but I felt David and Chamath still dodged his question. How do we decide if these decisions worked? How many factories opened in rust belt, middle class manufacturing jobs actual reshore? Where is GDP, unemployment, stock market in 3 years?
Well.. that's what Ezra wanted them to agree to.. to measure based on manufacturing jobs. But the others were too smart to just walk into his trap... and it was a trap argument.

Bottom line for me is this.. did Trump's tactics on tariffs help or hurt the overall deficit picture? Don't pick a specific measurable because then you are only locked into doing things that effect that measurable. If the financial picture improves in every way except a count of actual manufacturing jobs.. then it will have been a success but agreeing to Ezra's test criteria would score it as a failure.
 

tom1944

New member
Feb 22, 2008
6,713
7,019
0
Well.. that's what Ezra wanted them to agree to.. to measure based on manufacturing jobs. But the others were too smart to just walk into his trap... and it was a trap argument.

Bottom line for me is this.. did Trump's tactics on tariffs help or hurt the overall deficit picture? Don't pick a specific measurable because then you are only locked into doing things that effect that measurable. If the financial picture improves in every way except a count of actual manufacturing jobs.. then it will have been a success but agreeing to Ezra's test criteria would score it as a failure.
Are you saying we should look if the US deficit increases to judge if these tariffs were a failure? If it does not increase, they were a success?
 

xWVU2010x

New member
Sep 3, 2006
138,419
583
0
So... we are now not going to listen to Trump?
It’s more reading between the lines than listening to Trump. I don’t like the guy but if you traded off of his daily whims you’d be broke. We still don’t fully know what his rhetoric on tariffs will actually bring in the long term. Probabilities point up to those who are patient though, and it’s more to my points a few pages back that the American economy is crazy strong, literally anyone can ride it upwards if they aren’t out to destroy it.
 

RU05

Well-known member
Jun 25, 2015
14,192
8,939
113
Well.. that's what Ezra wanted them to agree to.. to measure based on manufacturing jobs. But the others were too smart to just walk into his trap... and it was a trap argument.

Bottom line for me is this.. did Trump's tactics on tariffs help or hurt the overall deficit picture? Don't pick a specific measurable because then you are only locked into doing things that effect that measurable. If the financial picture improves in every way except a count of actual manufacturing jobs.. then it will have been a success but agreeing to Ezra's test criteria would score it as a failure.
I was only able to get through about a half hour, so I'm not sure how specific the question became, or how they tried to answer it, but I think they could have answered the overall "what is success?" question noting a broad range of potential impacts. They didn't have to tie themselves to a specific criteria.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bigbirdRU

bigbirdRU

New member
Mar 6, 2010
2,244
310
0
Well.. that's what Ezra wanted them to agree to.. to measure based on manufacturing jobs. But the others were too smart to just walk into his trap... and it was a trap argument.

Bottom line for me is this.. did Trump's tactics on tariffs help or hurt the overall deficit picture? Don't pick a specific measurable because then you are only locked into doing things that effect that measurable. If the financial picture improves in every way except a count of actual manufacturing jobs.. then it will have been a success but agreeing to Ezra's test criteria would score it as a failure.
The last part is the key, and it cuts both ways, and i think that's what Chamath never touched on. Adding manufacturing jobs at any cost is not necessarily a success.

If those jobs are re-shored, inflation is squashed, and market and unemployment are good, then to me that is a success. If 20k jobs are re-shored but everything is more expensive, unemployment is 10% and market is down 40%, that is clearly not a good tradeoff.
 
Oct 19, 2010
176,672
21,529
0
Well.. that's what Ezra wanted them to agree to.. to measure based on manufacturing jobs. But the others were too smart to just walk into his trap... and it was a trap argument.

Bottom line for me is this.. did Trump's tactics on tariffs help or hurt the overall deficit picture? Don't pick a specific measurable because then you are only locked into doing things that effect that measurable. If the financial picture improves in every way except a count of actual manufacturing jobs.. then it will have been a success but agreeing to Ezra's test criteria would score it as a failure.

There's a big 'if' there.
 

ScarletNut

New member
Jul 27, 2001
5,417
4,106
0
The last part is the key, and it cuts both ways, and i think that's what Chamath never touched on. Adding manufacturing jobs at any cost is not necessarily a success.

If those jobs are re-shored, inflation is squashed, and market and unemployment are good, then to me that is a success. If 20k jobs are re-shored but everything is more expensive, unemployment is 10% and market is down 40%, that is clearly not a good tradeoff.
IMO, only essential items and those necessary for national security should be re-shored. We shouldn’t chance inflation and an economic slowdown for items that we Americans are forced to pay more for.
 

GoodOl'Rutgers

New member
Sep 11, 2006
124,023
19,602
0
Are you saying we should look if the US deficit increases to judge if these tariffs were a failure? If it does not increase, they were a success?
Will it increase less than what every other president has done lately? As a a nation, we cannot go on spending more than we make.
 

RU05

Well-known member
Jun 25, 2015
14,192
8,939
113
Will it increase less than what every other president has done lately? As a a nation, we cannot go on spending more than we make.
Ya, turning that dynamic around in a year or two sounds unreasonable, but if GDP can grow faster then the deficit that would be a good first step.
 

T2Kplus20

Well-known member
May 1, 2007
29,737
17,713
113
I keep looking for another entry point for more LEAPs but it keeps gapping up.
I took profit on half my contracts (which were getting out of control). I bought way too many this round. My plan is to let the others ride for a while. If there is a nice dip, I can rebuy what I sold. I think gold is heading past $3500 on its way to $4000 by years end, but there is normally a buyable dip after such a breakout.

Fingers crossed! :)
 

Postman_1

Well-known member
Mar 12, 2017
6,760
10,907
113
I took profit on half my contracts (which were getting out of control). I bought way too many this round. My plan is to let the others ride for a while. If there is a nice dip, I can rebuy what I sold. I think gold is heading past $3500 on its way to $4000 by years end, but there is normally a buyable dip after such a breakout.

Fingers crossed! :)
Yeah Gold has been pumping like crazy! Purchased some physical last week.

Did my monthly DCA into VOO today as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: T2Kplus20