If you are not making sleights at the current coach out of loyalty to the former coach, then what exactly is your argument? That we don't currently this season have enough talent to win? Wow, congratulations! You win the Sherlock Holmes award of excellence for your sleuthing skills!
This entire thread is about how good Stansbury recruited and how we will never win again because we won't get those type of players anymore (even though that's simply an uneducated assumption being made by certain posters). You think that you are slick by not bringing him up. As if somehow that cloaks your unwillingness to support the basketball program in the post-Stansbury era in secrecy. You don't have a very good argument for your hypothesis, so you resort to things on the fringe of the argument. It's akin to a diversion. Hey look over here!!! Pay no attention to the real issue over there!! Make up an argument that is completely false, and then when you get called on it, ignore that part and attack elsewhere. Come to think of it you and Peaches must've been educated in the same mold.
I'm not claiming to be a basketball expert. I do feel that I have a very solid foundation of basketball knowledge, but will never say that my level of basketball IQ or insight is any better than anyone else's. But it has nothing to do with basketball knowledge to realize that all you post on basketball lately is little subtle jabs, aimed at the current coach, here and there designed to stay under the radar. If you think that this makes you more mature, then by all means enjoy having your grown up glass of scotch (which I fully support for the record because scotch is delicious).