I’m not an NFL fan so I don’t understand the variety of interpretations of the rule for having two feet inbounds on a catch…
The last TD was ruled a good catch even though the receiver had ONE foot inbounds and landed on his side partially out of bounds before the other foot bounced off the turf. That looked to me like the guy was out before his second foot came down.
Anyone understand how that’s ruled as two feet inbounds?…
The last TD was ruled a good catch even though the receiver had ONE foot inbounds and landed on his side partially out of bounds before the other foot bounced off the turf. That looked to me like the guy was out before his second foot came down.
Anyone understand how that’s ruled as two feet inbounds?…