Debunked by the NY times no less. Much ado about nothing. Onto the next faux crises.
Senate Arms Committee to investigate Hegseth’s illegal order
- Thread starter NJPSU
- Start date
The article and the title don't really match to me. They haven't confirmed he specifically authorized the second strike. They have left the door open for that to fall on Admiral Bradley.
to me the question falls to - was the vessel still floating, not destroyed with some cargo intact? From the NYT articles it seems so as the reporter highlights that the survivors contacted some of their colleagues, and that might intimate that a second strike was warranted. Again from the Times article, it does not appear as if Hegseth ordered a second strike with directions to kill everyone.
But as with media today, likely neither article is 100% right. The true answer likely falls somewhere in the middle, and you can never discount the "fog" normally attached to armed conflict
I think they were trying to split the difference by saying Hegseth authorized it (Karoline Leavitt confirmed) but Bradley ordered it.
Right, still feels misleading to me. Not like some articles, etc, but had opened it expecting something I hadn't heard. Not the worst article to title i've seen thats for sure lol, was just expecting more information based on the title.
I know what it is from and only an idiot would attribute it to LUSTING after his daughter.....
That said, I know you thrive on literally anything to confirm your bias. I find it amusing. Please continue. Three more years will go fast.
Maybe someone needs to wake up to what he has said over the years but hey I’m sure carrying water for a despot gets heavy, but you do you.
The only water I carry is to the table to watch wingnuts like you lose their **** daily over every word Trump says, or another Ron Filipkowski tweet....
TDS is the greatest show on Earth.
Why won't you answer the question then? Would you ever say to your daughter that you would date her, if you weren't related? If not, why not?
Everyone and their mama knows why you won't answer the question ... why you keep avoiding it ... because it's CREEPY as PHUCK to say that ... because it's evidence of sexual attraction to your daughter ... "lusting" ... it's sick. But you also don't want to incriminate your Fuhrer. You're just here to troll and take your frustrations out on others and pretend it's because you're happy.
LOL.... Like I said, only an idiot would interpret this comment as LUSTFUL toward his daughter. That's how mentally deranged you are because of the emotion of hate.
Wow. You guys blow my mind.
YOUR FUHRER!!!!! lol...
You know how creepy ... and lustful ... saying to your daughter "if you weren't my daughter, we'd probably be dating" would be. YOU interpret this comment as lustful to your own daughter. That's why you won't answer the question.
Only a fool would ascribe intent as being lustful.... So next time just admit to it.
If you actually believed that, you would answer the question ... and you would answer it in the affirmative.
Would you ever say to your daughter "if you weren't my daughter, we'd probably be dating"?
While you're at it ... answer this ... what's the difference between going somewhere with a friend (of either sex), and "dating" someone?
I know why you won't answer these questions. You know why you won't answer these questions. But, you're a troll, so you'll just avoid, avoid, avoid.
If you actually believed the intent wasn't lustful, you could answer this without hesitation, and it wouldn't bother you ... instead, you avoid it, and pretend like someone else is the problem.
There’s only one person getting spun out and that appears to be you, lol.
I believe it. Absolutely. Remember, I'm the normal one here.
Now go on blathering like an idiot that Trump lusts after his daughter.
If you have to try to tell people you're the normal one, you're not.
Just answer the question. It's a simple question. It's a straightforward question. It's a question that 99.9% of fathers with daughters can and would answer in a second, without hesitation or equivocation.
"Would you ever say to your daughter 'If you weren't my daughter, we'd probably be dating?'"
Their answer would be a resounding "No! I would never say that!"
And if you followed up with "Why?"
They would say "Because that's sick." and if they expounded, it'd be some form of talking about how it's sexual, lustful, etc.
You, on the other hand, won't provide your answer because you're a troll, and given your trolling, you know you have 2 choices which are incompatible with your trolling activity: 1. admit your answer is no, admit it's because it's sexual in nature and that's not acceptable, and then you make your Fuhrer look bad; 2. admit your answer is yes, and now you're a mentally unwell individual who wants to bang his daughter.
Instead, you stutter and stammer about "intent," even though that clearly doesn't help your situation. So, you have to pick 1 or 2 ... and if you don't, I'll pick it for you.
Your NPD is kicking in SimplyComplicated...... I can see it with every additional post. Just like before.
I'm the normal one. You're psychotic from Trump winning. So much so that you ascribe "LUSTFUL" for comments meant to convey his daughter is attractive. That's what TDS does. Twists you around in knots.
Last edited:
I'll answer your question...I said that wanting to date someone wasn't the same as saying I want to Bang you. All I got in return was your belief that the only people you want to date are the ones you want to bang. Which, as I said multiple times, might be true for you but not for everybody. Just show me where your mind is.
I won't say your outlook on dating is a little "warped" because there might be others that think like you. But I'm pretty sure not everyone does.
Guys, what is with the pedantry? Wanting to date someone naturally implies a physical/emotional attraction to them. What Trump said was, at best inappropriate, and at worst absolutely disgusting. Being that Trump is relatively well known as a Lothario, idk why we're nitpicking definitions. Do I think he wants to **** his daughter? No. I think he made a corny and inappropriate joke about how his daughter was as attractive as the models he "dates (read: sleeps around with).
