The. Who's willing to admit I was right and they were wrong thread?

ANDREdaGIANT

Redshirt
Oct 31, 2016
13
5
0
I knew this thread was coming back up...

BTW this will be ANDRE's 3rd username in less than 12 months...

Sad...
whats sad? UKwinsagain wasnt having any of Andre being on this board any longer he was determined to have an Andre-less board, or so i heard at least. Whats sad, is the fact that you could refer to people as being sad over something on a message board. Now that sir, is sad. Even you sir, had given up at one point this season. Anyone with a realistic bone in their body did.
 

ANDREdaGIANT

Redshirt
Oct 31, 2016
13
5
0
I'm just negative Nancy. Am I glad we're 5-3? Absolutely. Am I happy that all we have to do is beat Austin Peay in order to go bowling ? Yes. Am I aware that the record reflects an extremely weak SEC East of which only 3 teams have a winning record? Yep. Am I comforted by the fact that we've scraped out some wins against some bad teams while looking like a pop warner squad against good teams ? No!
100% fact that our record is a result of beating up terrible teams. But hell. 6 wins is 6 wins. Im not 100% sold on Stoops yet still. We need to beat a team with a winning record before im completely sold. Which hasnt happened in years under stoops. But i feel like we could beat at least one of UGA (if they make bowl), UT, and UL. IF we get at least one of those which i think we will. I'll say Stoops has probably proven himself. Though not sure how a UGA win will shape up for us at end of season if they finish 5-7. So we may have to beat one of UT and UL. We can't have good season and lay an egg next season though.
 

jauk11

Heisman
Dec 6, 2006
60,631
18,638
0
I'm just negative Nancy. Am I glad we're 5-3? Absolutely. Am I happy that all we have to do is beat Austin Peay in order to go bowling ? Yes. Am I aware that the record reflects an extremely weak SEC East of which only 3 teams have a winning record? Yep. Am I comforted by the fact that we've scraped out some wins against some bad teams while looking like a pop warner squad against good teams ? No!

Are you happy that we turned a disasterous start into a bowl season?

Are you happy that we came up with a (a second one really) RB prospect that is really exciting to watch-----and that he is only a true freshman?

Are you happy that the turnaround will help retain some very good commits, and maybe even attract some even better ones, especially with the improvement on the OL AND the DL? (The Mizzou announcers thought UK might have the THIRD best OL in the SEC-----and they should be better next year, IMO).

Are you happy that our OC and QB coach have managed to rework our offense (which lost our 4* starter and is using our 3* transfer) is still scoring enough to win games in the SEC, possibly the most since 1977, only a 2.5 dog to Georgia?

Lots more similar questions, but maybe you can come up with some of them.

And are you happy that we won't be firing this staff (was never going to happen anyway) or are you one of the losers that are disappointed that we won't be starting all over again?

To me this is just a beginning, NEXT year is when we should start competing with the better SEC teams-------AND Transfer U..
 

cardkilla_rivals379685

All-Conference
May 10, 2002
2,076
1,695
0
100% fact that our record is a result of beating up terrible teams. But hell. 6 wins is 6 wins. Im not 100% sold on Stoops yet still. We need to beat a team with a winning record before im completely sold. Which hasnt happened in years under stoops. But i feel like we could beat at least one of UGA (if they make bowl), UT, and UL. IF we get at least one of those which i think we will. I'll say Stoops has probably proven himself. Though not sure how a UGA win will shape up for us at end of season if they finish 5-7. So we may have to beat one of UT and UL. We can't have good season and lay an egg next season though.
So you mean to tell me that UK was beating SC, Vandy, Miss St all those years when they were really good? Oh wait, no, because, they've generally not been good historically. And yet we still would lose to them. Yet, here we are, winning 4 conference games for only the 5th time in 40+ years. I guess when you are extremely WRONG, you gotta make excuses. Cats can only play the teams on their schedule. All of those teams have been ahead in some ranking measures before we beat them...some STILL are.

Sure, we gotta start winning our share against FL, GA, UT, and UL. But you can't build a successful program until you beat teams like SC, Vandy, Miss St, and Mizzou most years. So far - 2 in a row vs Mizzou, 3 in a row vs SC, ending losing streaks vs Miss St and Vandy. That's how you build a program.

Stoops has built this program methodically and without shortcuts. Sure, some other coach could have come in and maybe won a bit earlier but not sure they would have built anywhere near the foundation that Stoops has for future success.

NOW EAT YOUR CROW!! [roll]:flush:
 

allabouttheUK

All-Conference
Jan 28, 2015
3,079
3,390
0
I can't help but laugh at the folks who said things like "Our offense will be our defense" and "Our offense will keep our defense off the field, rested, and fresh."

When you have no proven QB, a swiss cheese OL, and have never had a run-game like Alabama's, one can never count on their offense to keep their defense off the field. Even Hal Mumme and his offenses scoring 50 points never made UK's defense better as they would just turn around and allow the opponent to score.

Just a lot of low football IQ fans on this board.

Come again?! [laughing]
 

allabouttheUK

All-Conference
Jan 28, 2015
3,079
3,390
0
I for one am glad that Andre basketball player dude is gone. He was nothing more than a blow hard that knew absolutely nothing about football (hence the basketball username). Dude was/is a coward for running away, and not taking his lashing like a man when the season turned around...then again he doesn't give a **** about UK Football and that is evident by his actions, and disappearing act.
Now this new Andre wrestler dude, he seems highly intelligent! I think we should all cut this guy some slack, he clearly isn't the other Andre. I mean how retarded would one have to be to create another username with part of the same name in it? Just glad this new guy isn't a pu$$y like the other one is/was.

As for those making comments about these old thread being brought back to life...well hell yeah they are, and should be. The way three or four people acted and talked to others on here, the damn sure should be made to A) come back and eat their crow like a man, B) run like a cowardly little b!tch and never come back.
I am ALLLLL for it. Hell I gladly ate my crow in the coach Schlarman thread.
 

smithe2

Redshirt
Jan 13, 2013
134
21
0
100% fact that our record is a result of beating up terrible teams. But hell. 6 wins is 6 wins. Im not 100% sold on Stoops yet still. We need to beat a team with a winning record before im completely sold. Which hasnt happened in years under stoops. But i feel like we could beat at least one of UGA (if they make bowl), UT, and UL. IF we get at least one of those which i think we will. I'll say Stoops has probably proven himself. Though not sure how a UGA win will shape up for us at end of season if they finish 5-7. So we may have to beat one of UT and UL. We can't have good season and lay an egg next season though.

I do not post very often, but you are the EXACT type of UK fan that most of us are embarrassed by. Disgraceful.
 

shutzhund

All-Conference
Nov 19, 2005
29,202
2,619
0
Long time reader here. i gotta hunch that Andre will gladly eat crow on this one. In all fairness to Andre though, one of his major critical points was lack of game preperation and very poor clock management. His number one point though im pretty sure if i remember correctly was that he was saying all last season and this season that the in game/halftime adjustments were just downright atrocious. At the time, Andre was right. No one had any reason to believe Stoops could turn it around at that point. Only the biggest of homers couldve predicted 4 straight wins and a bowl at this point in the season. And honestly Andre im pretty sure will give Stoops credit for the turn around this year. But in order to prove himself worthy of remaining here we need 2 good seasons in a row. We cant just have a good season this year and lay an egg next year and go 5-7 or something. But for the meantime. Seems like a new and improved Stoops and its a fun team to watch. The best thing that ever happened for him was taking Elliot's job.

Also people need to remember that Andre was openly rooting for UK each and every game and come game time pretty much predicted these wins. He said MSU couldnt handle Snell and our physical backs. Andre was also sure of a win at mizzou due to the same thing with our backs and the inability for mizzou to stop anyone and their best player had just gotten injured for the year which basically put an end to the Mizzou D. He expected a win vs Vandy but knew itd be tough. Thought forsure we'd beat USC. All these things Andre said was the week of the game. He did predict 4-8 or 5-7 before the season, Which couldve easily happened. But we responded and it didnt. He said after the NMSU game Snell would go down as best back in UK history. And also defended Johnson when many gave up on him. He did have his doubts after the first half of the MSU game. But so did everyone else incuding the press. But before then he was one of the few defending him basically the entire time. Andre Aite peoples fr fr.


Hauntingly familiar theme. Andre you seemed to have resurrected yourself and rejoined us. What a friggin pity.
 

Bank Cat

All-American
Dec 8, 2011
3,552
5,238
113
For future reference:

Andre Agassi -tennis player
Major John Andre - British major hanged as a spy
Andre Braugher - fine actor
Andre Marie Ampere - physicist
Andrei Chikalito - murderer

As far as I know, these are still available screen names.

Welcome to the board, Andre.
 

allabouttheUK

All-Conference
Jan 28, 2015
3,079
3,390
0
For future reference:

Andre Agassi -tennis player
Major John Andre - British major hanged as a spy
Andre Braugher - fine actor
Andre Marie Ampere - physicist
Andrei Chikalito - murderer

As far as I know, these are still available screen names.

Welcome to the board, Andre.

2 and 5 seem to be the likely next steps...in that order.
 

WildcatDJ

All-Conference
May 20, 2007
4,708
1,601
113
Just for the record, our opponent's record wouldn't look so bad if we weren't beating them. Take away our win against them:

Vandy 5-3
South Carolina 5-3
Miss St 4-4
Mizzou 3-5

That would be our opponent's records if they had beaten UK like they normally do.
 

ANDREdaGIANT

Redshirt
Oct 31, 2016
13
5
0
So you mean to tell me that UK was beating SC, Vandy, Miss St all those years when they were really good? Oh wait, no, because, they've generally not been good historically. And yet we still would lose to them. Yet, here we are, winning 4 conference games for only the 5th time in 40+ years. I guess when you are extremely WRONG, you gotta make excuses. Cats can only play the teams on their schedule. All of those teams have been ahead in some ranking measures before we beat them...some STILL are.

Sure, we gotta start winning our share against FL, GA, UT, and UL. But you can't build a successful program until you beat teams like SC, Vandy, Miss St, and Mizzou most years. So far - 2 in a row vs Mizzou, 3 in a row vs SC, ending losing streaks vs Miss St and Vandy. That's how you build a program.

Stoops has built this program methodically and without shortcuts. Sure, some other coach could have come in and maybe won a bit earlier but not sure they would have built anywhere near the foundation that Stoops has for future success.

NOW EAT YOUR CROW!! [roll]:flush:
MSU, SC and even Vandy have been very good over the last decade in comparison to us. Especially MSU. SC has only sucked the last 3 years, Vandy about 4-5 years. MSU has been good for the last decade. I think there's a reason we beat these teams once they bottomed out. Dont be that guy that acts like we beat some great teams. We have the potential to beat some good teams. But as of now we haven't beaten anyone any good. I actually posted a thread weeks ago saying we could start out 5-2 with wins over abunch of terrible teams. I'm not going to eat too much crow considering i predicted it. We got lucky to play SC when we did. If they had Bently Playing like he is now when we played them. We probably wouldve lost.

If this wasnt the worst year for the SEC East in a long time. Then we wouldnt have 4 SEC wins. Don't be naive. We're a product of a very weak division. Dont pretend like we're some juggernaut til we beat someone at least halfway decent. That Woodson team would've easily won this division. And btw. Dont use previous seasons to justify those wins. All these teams suck complete donkey butt in comparison to where they were years ago. I made a thread weeks ago clearly stating we could very well go 5-2 without beating a single quality SEC opponent. So I'm not going to eat too much crow considering i was correct about the whole we could easily win 5 SEC games by beating 5 very bad teams. Which is what weve done. We've beaten 4 terribly atrocious SEC teams in a row. It is it what it is. Don't attempt to make it something that its not. Wait til we actually beat someone worthy of note. Can you remember the last time we beat a team that finished with a winning record? If you can, feel free to post it.
 

allabouttheUK

All-Conference
Jan 28, 2015
3,079
3,390
0
MSU, SC and even Vandy have been very good over the last decade in comparison to us. Especially MSU. SC has only sucked the last 3 years, Vandy about 4-5 years. MSU has been good for the last decade. I think there's a reason we beat these teams once they bottomed out. Dont be that guy that acts like we beat some great teams. We have the potential to beat some good teams. But as of now we haven't beaten anyone any good. I actually posted a thread weeks ago saying we could start out 5-2 with wins over abunch of terrible teams. I'm not going to eat too much crow considering i predicted it. We got lucky to play SC when we did. If they had Bently Playing like he is now when we played them. We probably wouldve lost.

If this wasnt the worst year for the SEC East in a long time. Then we wouldnt have 4 SEC wins. Don't be naive. We're a product of a very weak division. Dont pretend like we're some juggernaut til we beat someone at least halfway decent. That Woodson team would've easily won this division. And btw. Dont use previous seasons to justify those wins. All these teams suck complete donkey butt in comparison to where they were years ago. I made a thread weeks ago clearly stating we could very well go 5-2 without beating a single quality SEC opponent. So I'm not going to eat too much crow considering i was correct about the whole we could easily win 5 SEC games by beating 5 very bad teams. Which is what weve done. We've beaten 4 terribly atrocious SEC teams in a row. It is it what it is. Don't attempt to make it something that its not. Wait til we actually beat someone worthy of note. Can you remember the last time we beat a team that finished with a winning record? If you can, feel free to post it.

Oh really? You've got barely two handfuls of posts yet you did those things?

You are one sad human being and sorry excuse for a man.

As was pointed out earlier if those "bad" teams had beaten us like they usually do, what would their records be? Two of those four would be one win from going bowling and we wold be listening to how right you and a couple others were. Thankfully that's not the case and you and a couple others are too dense to admit when you're wrong, too much of a cowardly b!tch to eat your crow like a man.

Go make up another screen-name loser.
 
  • Like
Reactions: assistbyhawkins

ANDREdaGIANT

Redshirt
Oct 31, 2016
13
5
0
I do not post very often, but you are the EXACT type of UK fan that most of us are embarrassed by. Disgraceful.
I find it pathetic when people try to act like we're beating bowl teams. Like why make more of the situation than what it is? So the UK fans that acknowledge truth are a disgrace? Vandy? Dominant team. MSU? World beaters. Mizzou? without by far their best player? Champions. USC? 10 win seasons left and right. Lol. Happy? I said we very easily could and should beat a good team. But dont be so damn naive, We still haven't beat a winning team we haven't beat a winning team in years. The fact some can't acknowledge that are an absolute disgrace to football and having zero knowledge about the sport. Youre the reason most fans think we know nothing about football.

We beat 4 trash teams and all of a sudden we're world beaters. Anyone with half a brain (including everyone on the SEC Nation crew) has said we're doing what we're doing as a product of a terribly weak division. Just wish people would stop being so dumb and realize. I'm just relaying what the analysts of SEC now are saying. We haven't beaten a single quality opponent yet. Don't be dumb. Try and at least make us look knowledgeable. Acting like we have beaten a ton of good teams when we're beating trash opponent after another isn't helping our case. We're just better than all the trash teams, we've reached the level of mediocrity finally. Which is much better than where we were. Once we beat a winning team. THEN we can make the claim for being better than mediocre. It is what it is. Take it or leave it. Don't sound dumb just because i pointed out the obvious.
 

ANDREdaGIANT

Redshirt
Oct 31, 2016
13
5
0
Oh really? You've got barely two handfuls of posts yet you did those things?

You are one sad human being and sorry excuse for a man.

As was pointed out earlier if those "bad" teams had beaten us like they usually do, what would their records be? Two of those four would be one win from going bowling and we wold be listening to how right you and a couple others were. Thankfully that's not the case and you and a couple others are too dense to admit when you're wrong, too much of a cowardly b!tch to eat your crow like a man.

Go make up another screen-name loser.
Yes i did those things. So why eat crow when I said we could easily win 5 SEC games without beating a single quality team weeks ago? And why turn our win to a win for them to make a case? Absolutely ridiculous. Just take us off the schedule for those teams if you want to make a case. SC with Bently. Is much better than the SC team we played with a trash nobody at QB. So take the 2 wins bently has on the SC win column if you want to play that game. And take us off the schedule instead of adding imaginary wins to those teams schedules. Worst argument ive ever heard used. If you change this loss to a win for that team, then they wouldnt look so bad. lol. YOU SERIOUS RIGHT NOW???
 

allabouttheUK

All-Conference
Jan 28, 2015
3,079
3,390
0
I find it pathetic when people try to act like we're beating bowl teams. Like why make more of the situation than what it is? So the UK fans that acknowledge truth are a disgrace? Vandy? Dominant team. MSU? World beaters. Mizzou? without by far their best player? Champions. USC? 10 win seasons left and right. Lol. Happy? I said we very easily could and should beat a good team. But dont be so damn naive, We still haven't beat a winning team we haven't beat a winning team in years. The fact some can't acknowledge that are an absolute disgrace to football and having zero knowledge about the sport. Youre the reason most fans think we know nothing about football.

We beat 4 trash teams and all of a sudden we're world beaters. Anyone with half a brain (including everyone on the SEC Nation crew) has said we're doing what we're doing as a product of a terribly weak division. Just wish people would stop being so dumb and realize. I'm just relaying what the analysts of SEC now are saying. We haven't beaten a single quality opponent yet. Don't be dumb. Try and at least make us look knowledgeable. Acting like we have beaten a ton of good teams when we're beating trash opponent after another isn't helping our case. We're just better than all the trash teams, we've reached the level of mediocrity finally. Which is much better than where we were. Once we beat a winning team. THEN we can make the claim for being better than mediocre. It is what it is. Take it or leave it. Don't sound dumb just because i pointed out the obvious.

Time to go make another screen-name, coward.
 

allabouttheUK

All-Conference
Jan 28, 2015
3,079
3,390
0
Yes i did those things. So why eat crow when I said we could easily win 5 SEC games without beating a single quality team weeks ago? And why turn our win to a win for them to make a case? Absolutely ridiculous. Just take us off the schedule for those teams if you want to make a case. SC with Bently. Is much better than the SC team we played with a trash nobody at QB. So take the 2 wins bently has on the SC win column if you want to play that game. And take us off the schedule instead of adding imaginary wins to those teams schedules. Worst argument ive ever heard used. If you change this loss to a win for that team, then they wouldnt look so bad. lol. YOU SERIOUS RIGHT NOW???

You're a spineless coward, and yes I am DEAD serious about that! Two of those teams we beat could possibly be bowling...not near as bad as you and the other jackasses claimed they would be.

So you can't take the wins away, but you can talk about South Carolina without Bentley...what a tool (directed at you).
 

pikespeak1

All-Conference
Nov 30, 2008
1,460
1,144
0
Can people just stop.

I was really hoping that since we are finally good everyone could be all together and no more pro Stoops or anti Stoops crud. Lets not bring back stuff from almost 2 months ago just to start up some mess.

Lets keep things positive for once. Deserving of a bashing or not. (probably deserving)
I'll agree to that if you promise not to go back to bashing Stoops at the first sign of struggle.
 

ANDREdaGIANT

Redshirt
Oct 31, 2016
13
5
0
https://kentucky.forums.rivals.com/threads/how-lucky-are-we-this-season.214570/

I didnt say it. But as a huge fan of Dre. He did say it before the MSU game.

and to allabout

The funny part is you say that over a message board trying to sound big and tough over the damn internet. But if in person. I GAURANTEE you would never in a million years dare say that to my face. You just wouldn't, simple as that.

EDIT: To allabout the least knowledgeable poster on this board
Compare the QBR of the QB we played against. And Bentley. If you think SC now is the seam team we played then. Then you must think UK now is the same team USM played in game one. EVERYONE on SEC NOW has said what I've been saying about us being a product of a weak division. If you can't admit that. Then you have ZERO football knowledge.
 
Last edited:

allabouttheUK

All-Conference
Jan 28, 2015
3,079
3,390
0
https://kentucky.forums.rivals.com/threads/how-lucky-are-we-this-season.214570/

I didnt say it. But as a huge fan of Dre. He did say it before the MSU game.

and to allabout

The funny part is you say that over a message board trying to sound big and tough over the damn internet. But if in person. I GAURANTEE you would never in a million years dare say that to my face. You just wouldn't, simple as that.

lol...go make up another name, coward. Nobody here takes your trollin *** seriously. As for what I would do...BOY you don't know me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EastLansingCat

pikespeak1

All-Conference
Nov 30, 2008
1,460
1,144
0
I'm just negative Nancy. Am I glad we're 5-3? Absolutely. Am I happy that all we have to do is beat Austin Peay in order to go bowling ? Yes. Am I aware that the record reflects an extremely weak SEC East of which only 3 teams have a winning record? Yep. Am I comforted by the fact that we've scraped out some wins against some bad teams while looking like a pop warner squad against good teams ? No!
Is this an Andre screen name too?
 

pikespeak1

All-Conference
Nov 30, 2008
1,460
1,144
0
whats sad? UKwinsagain wasnt having any of Andre being on this board any longer he was determined to have an Andre-less board, or so i heard at least. Whats sad, is the fact that you could refer to people as being sad over something on a message board. Now that sir, is sad. Even you sir, had given up at one point this season. Anyone with a realistic bone in their body did.
That post where Andre's third screen name admits that his second screen name wanted to off his first screen name. Spooky.
 

pikespeak1

All-Conference
Nov 30, 2008
1,460
1,144
0
I find it pathetic when people try to act like we're beating bowl teams. Like why make more of the situation than what it is? So the UK fans that acknowledge truth are a disgrace? Vandy? Dominant team. MSU? World beaters. Mizzou? without by far their best player? Champions. USC? 10 win seasons left and right. Lol. Happy? I said we very easily could and should beat a good team. But dont be so damn naive, We still haven't beat a winning team we haven't beat a winning team in years. The fact some can't acknowledge that are an absolute disgrace to football and having zero knowledge about the sport. Youre the reason most fans think we know nothing about football.

We beat 4 trash teams and all of a sudden we're world beaters. Anyone with half a brain (including everyone on the SEC Nation crew) has said we're doing what we're doing as a product of a terribly weak division. Just wish people would stop being so dumb and realize. I'm just relaying what the analysts of SEC now are saying. We haven't beaten a single quality opponent yet. Don't be dumb. Try and at least make us look knowledgeable. Acting like we have beaten a ton of good teams when we're beating trash opponent after another isn't helping our case. We're just better than all the trash teams, we've reached the level of mediocrity finally. Which is much better than where we were. Once we beat a winning team. THEN we can make the claim for being better than mediocre. It is what it is. Take it or leave it. Don't sound dumb just because i pointed out the obvious.
Why create a new name if you were going to out yourself in the first thread? Oh by the way, you are still the worst.
 

pikespeak1

All-Conference
Nov 30, 2008
1,460
1,144
0
https://kentucky.forums.rivals.com/threads/how-lucky-are-we-this-season.214570/

I didnt say it. But as a huge fan of Dre. He did say it before the MSU game.

and to allabout

The funny part is you say that over a message board trying to sound big and tough over the damn internet. But if in person. I GAURANTEE you would never in a million years dare say that to my face. You just wouldn't, simple as that.

EDIT: To allabout the least knowledgeable poster on this board
Compare the QBR of the QB we played against. And Bentley. If you think SC now is the seam team we played then. Then you must think UK now is the same team USM played in game one. EVERYONE on SEC NOW has said what I've been saying about us being a product of a weak division. If you can't admit that. Then you have ZERO football knowledge.
I'll be your huckleberry.
 

bigbluegrog

Senior
Dec 12, 2012
2,636
816
0
We beat 4 trash teams and all of a sudden we're world beaters. Anyone with half a brain (including everyone on the SEC Nation crew) has said we're doing what we're doing as a product of a terribly weak division. Just wish people would stop being so dumb and realize. I'm just relaying what the analysts of SEC now are saying. We haven't beaten a single quality opponent yet. Don't be dumb. Try and at least make us look knowledgeable. Acting like we have beaten a ton of good teams when we're beating trash opponent after another isn't helping our case. We're just better than all the trash teams, we've reached the level of mediocrity finally. Which is much better than where we were. Once we beat a winning team. THEN we can make the claim for being better than mediocre. It is what it is. Take it or leave it. Don't sound dumb just because i pointed out the obvious.

Without looking, haven't we beaten at least a few teams that were favored over us, even if they are in a weak division? Mizzou, MSU come to mind....
 
  • Like
Reactions: allabouttheUK

brianpoe

Heisman
Mar 25, 2009
27,769
21,825
113
https://kentucky.forums.rivals.com/threads/how-lucky-are-we-this-season.214570/

The funny part is you say that over a message board trying to sound big and tough over the damn internet. But if in person. I GAURANTEE you would never in a million years dare say that to my face. You just wouldn't, simple as that.

.


Easy killer... dont forget i have seen you. And your little rap videos. (still waiting on the model girlfriend though..)

You look like a 145 pound version of Eminem's little brother, don't get too crazy about meeting people face to face, might not end up well. @allabouttheUK might put you over his knee...
 

brianpoe

Heisman
Mar 25, 2009
27,769
21,825
113
@brianpoe I am not even close to being a big dude, but I'm definitely not someone you should fck with.


These young kids all want to be tough guys.

Who was that other new guy last week, Derek? Wanted to meet everyone face to face in Lexington..

I told him I'd be his Huckleberry and offered up Drake's as a location. Next thing you know he is actually in Louisville, has no desire to meet anyone in person, and was just
misunderstood after threatening 5-6 posters...


We have had an abundance of youngin's join this year and immediately come across as disrespectful and combative.

Some actually know football, @TuckyFB started out very defensive but came around and figured things out rather quickly, which I can appreciate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: allabouttheUK

allabouttheUK

All-Conference
Jan 28, 2015
3,079
3,390
0
These young kids all want to be tough guys.

Who was that other new guy last week, Derek? Wanted to meet everyone face to face in Lexington..

I told him I'd be his Huckleberry and offered up Drake's as a location. Next thing you know he is actually in Louisville, has no desire to meet anyone in person, and was just
misunderstood after threatening 5-6 posters...


We have had an abundance of youngin's join this year and immediately come across as disrespectful and combative.

Some actually know football, @TuckyFB started out very defensive but came around and figured things out rather quickly, which I can appreciate.

I fall for that dumbshit more times than I would like to admit. This place is so much better when you put those fools on ignore. Weed out the ignorance and then you can truly see what this place is all about.
 

trav55_rivals214556

All-Conference
Jun 25, 2005
3,521
2,154
0
I find it pathetic when people try to act like we're beating bowl teams. Like why make more of the situation than what it is? So the UK fans that acknowledge truth are a disgrace? Vandy? Dominant team. MSU? World beaters. Mizzou? without by far their best player? Champions. USC? 10 win seasons left and right. Lol. Happy? I said we very easily could and should beat a good team. But dont be so damn naive, We still haven't beat a winning team we haven't beat a winning team in years. The fact some can't acknowledge that are an absolute disgrace to football and having zero knowledge about the sport. Youre the reason most fans think we know nothing about football.

We beat 4 trash teams and all of a sudden we're world beaters. Anyone with half a brain (including everyone on the SEC Nation crew) has said we're doing what we're doing as a product of a terribly weak division. Just wish people would stop being so dumb and realize. I'm just relaying what the analysts of SEC now are saying. We haven't beaten a single quality opponent yet. Don't be dumb. Try and at least make us look knowledgeable. Acting like we have beaten a ton of good teams when we're beating trash opponent after another isn't helping our case. We're just better than all the trash teams, we've reached the level of mediocrity finally. Which is much better than where we were. Once we beat a winning team. THEN we can make the claim for being better than mediocre. It is what it is. Take it or leave it. Don't sound dumb just because i pointed out the obvious.

I'll try again, even though I am highly confident that this will still fly right over andre's head.

#1. Andre, you are punching at thin air. Ever been driving down a street and saw a crazy person fighting themselves? That's you. The reason you're punching thin air? Because NOBODY is going crazy about the win! We're happy the team turned it around. We're happy we're playing better football and that we will finally go to a bowl. But I don't see anyone seriously talking about how amazing our football team is or about our "amazing wins" over "world beaters". If you want to prove me wrong, I'll be right here. But why stay pissed after wins? I mean, I feel like some of you are mad if we lose and pissed if we win. What gives?

#2. You said you predicted weeks ago that that we might win 5 wins and how the sec was terrible. The post I saw was from October 22. So you mean you predicted all of this A little over ONE WEEK AGO!!!! Jesus Christ the man himself is among us!!!! You sure went out on a limb!

#3. Again, Im not saying we've beaten anyone great. But South Carolina is at .500. Your measuring stick is beating a team that's not below .500. Then, you make excuses as to why South Carolina doesn't count suddenly because they aren't the same team. Why so many excuses? Why?

You're an impossible person to talk to and that's why you annoy people. You talk in circles and the brick wall beside me is easier to conversate with. You don't have to be on board with stoops. You don't have to like him, or believe in him. But YOU are the one who started a thread telling people to eat crow. It was the proverbial celebration before the game was over so to speak. The reverse LSU miracle in the bluegrass. That was two weeks into the season. Meanwhile, in your self congratulating and happy dance joke of a post, you failed to even acknowledge what you said that everyone else was so wrong about!

So THATS why you're catching heat now. And don't get pissed off! All this tough guy posturing and weak chest pounding. You should have learned as a kid, you better be able to take it if you're willing to dish it out.

P.S. Please stop rambling in third person. We're not idiots. Go back and read responses from "both" Andre's and see if you notice the consistent butchering of the English language that makes us all look stupid, moreso than our apparent lack of football knowledge.
 
Oct 1, 2001
5,199
1,898
0
Some people are just follewers and assume the powers that be like Barnhart and Stoops are so much smarter than themselves. Anytime anyone like you upsets the apple cart they go into the the awful poster act. But after this game were the National media actually made fun of the U.K. Football program, the people who dislike you because you say Stoops sucks must see that their is some problems in Lexington.

As for me, I think Barnhart has been an evil brought to destroy the football program. Why, because he completely misses the fact that the SEC plays big boy football and that having a big boy coach is priority one. All the money spent on CWS was stupid if you can't get a winner. Barnhart should have spent the money on a contract to a real football coach and when that person wins do the upgrades. If that guy fails fire him and get another.

A great football coach can win in Lexington but Barnhart has no clue how to find him.
The comedy post of the day. Thank you. We needed some levity this close to Election Day.