Time For This Discussion...

brianpoe

Heisman
Mar 25, 2009
27,769
21,825
113
After several times when it was clear he should pull the ball and take off but did not, I'm assuming he's gun shy at this point. Just afraid of another fumble.....


Or maybe he has been told to limit his carries...? He definitley had opportunities, and will need to keep the defense honest vs UGA and UT.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mojocat_rivals48469

Comebakatz3

Heisman
Aug 8, 2008
41,399
31,411
113
? 292 yards passing against MSU and 205 yards against Mizzou - when you're getting chunk yardage running the ball downhill, there isn't any need to put the ball in the air any more than that. This offense is almost a picture perfect balance of establishing the run to set up the pass. It's been nearly textbook except for the TOs.

Well, I think we will have an excellent idea of just how good our offense is after this weekend. If we can run the ball against Georgia then we can run the ball against anyone. However, the struggle is going to occur if we can not use the run to set up the pass and Johnson has to use the pass to establish the run. If he is leaned on, will he be able to drop back and make the reads and the throws that will force the defense to back out of 8 in the box and give UK the run advantage? We will see.
 
  • Like
Reactions: brianpoe

floboi03

Senior
Apr 8, 2009
951
638
93
If Johnson could cure 3 flaws he has shown in every game he has played he would be unreal, imo.
1. Hit the TE over the middle (for the life of Johnson for some reason he continues to miss a wide open CJ every game).
2. Quit getting balls knocked down at the LOS (every game he's started he has a wide open receiver on a screen and gets the ball tipped)
3. Quit fumbling. (which he did a good job of holding onto the ball this past game vs. Mizzou).

All 3 of those issues are easy fixes. I'm telling ya, if he can fix those things, the guy can be and will be really really good!
 

Rockford

Heisman
Jun 28, 2001
22,114
45,945
83
I think that is the way it always is, but you also have to rely on the guys that you know have experience and you know how they do in the games. You can then bring in backups from time to time and if they begin to get the experience and do better than the starters then they begin to get more reps and more playing time.

Still, this position is not necessarily about the best player. There are a lot of intangibles that go into this position that effect the entire team. So, let's say that our offense in practice moves 10 times better with Hoak. Do we throw him immediately to the fire as a redshirt freshman despite the fact that Johnson will have 10 starts under his belt and a pretty darn good winning record? Also, how do your others players respond to their leader from a year ago no longer getting the position after leading them to a bowl game? So, "best player", when it comes to quarterback, is a lot more than just who does best in practice.

I can see your point at QB but...........

If someone is clearly the best player, heads and shoulders above, you've got to play that guy.

Players respect that.

I know a guy well that played for Brooks ( and Joker as OC) When Joker became coach I asked him what he thought. He said that we were in trouble. Joker plays his favorites, does not play the best player and it will cost him, players will not respect Joker in that regard. Players won't work hard if they believe their hard work won't pay off and best man plays.

I saw that with Newton, and I'm betting there were others. TIFWIW
 
Apr 6, 2010
1,092
457
0
I think the analyst during the Missouri explained that Johnsons throw starts low which results in the ball being thrown high.

If we are debating who I want at QB this Saturday, either Johnson or Barker (prior injury) I'm going with Johnson every time. Georgia is a big game and one we could easily lose or win, and Johnson has a better chance at winning that game than any other QB on our roster.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mattrudd

rabidcatfan

Senior
Jan 25, 2003
9,198
512
0
He's earned the QB job for the rest of this season, but as far as next season is concerned, I'm not sure. He's needs to gain some muscle and learn to stop fumbling the ball and he needs to work on his throwing power and accuracy. If he does this then he's got a chance to start next seaosn, but it's going to be tough when you've got Drew Barker and Gunnar Hoak out there as well.
 

Xception

Heisman
Apr 17, 2007
26,407
22,344
0
Just have another competition in the spring . The question is would the offense be better with Barker and I think it would . Based on his ability to throw deeper and more accurate , it would compliment the running game even more . Johnson has played well with the exceptions of turnovers and accuracy issues . I think teams are going to all out stack the box the rest of our games and try to force Johnson to beat them throwing , he needs to keep them honest .
 

maysvilleky

All-American
Aug 13, 2003
15,769
5,109
0
I think without a doubt the Coaches saw DB as being the better passer and having the most knowledge of the offense coming into the season. With his injury, it forced the staff to make changes. They had to go run heavy and also simplify the playbook. To the staff's and team's credit, they didn't give up on the season and have molded the team to what they have. And fortunately because of the successes they were having, the team built up some confidence. I think each week you see a little more of the playbook as SJ gets more comfortable. But the interesting thing will be to see if the team stays conservative next year if Barker is healthy and can win back the job. I honestly think right now SJ has the confidence of the TEAM and I think that goes a LONG way. Barker is going to have to be extra good to win back the job IMO.
 
Jan 14, 2003
1,521
155
0
It's always an open competition. Nothing is, or should be, given.

But I consider Johnson the QB until someone definitively takes it from him. I personally would love to see what an offseason of putting on some strength (the primary cause of the fumbles imo), and working with Hinshaw, Gran, and the skill players could do. I actually could envision him being a beast next year.
 

ringoky

Redshirt
Oct 31, 2016
11
13
0
Yeah as others have said, he should be the guy going forward until someone else steps up and takes it from him.

He has to cut down on those turnovers. I know the staff has been working with him on securing the ball more, but he has to know when to pull the ball and take off.

Just slide and avoid the hit. (Of course, he should have had that targeting call when he did slide and got hit late against Miss St.)
 

UKCatsFan10

Junior
May 17, 2010
1,681
303
0
It's his unless someone else earns it. He makes his fair share of mistakes, but you take the good with the bad. Hopefully an offseason dedicated to addressing his downfalls will help correct that.

Bottom line is that he's 6-1 with his only loss coming at Alabama. Not bad.
 

cookscats

Freshman
Aug 1, 2006
1,089
61
0
I know he isn't doing everything text book or perfect, but I think that Stephen Johnson has earned the right to be the man going forward at qb...yes, he has some things to work on, but I think that with continuted practice reps and now with the extra month of bowl practices he has great upside and I love his cool demeanor on the field...what say you?
I know he isn't doing everything text book or perfect, but I think that Stephen Johnson has earned the right to be the man going forward at qb...yes, he has some things to work on, but I think that with continuted practice reps and now with the extra month of bowl practices he has great upside and I love his cool demeanor on the field...what say you?
Johnson has made plays that has helped this team & some plays that has made some games closer than what they should have been. Kids only loss has been on the road at Alabama. Barker will get his shot I'm sure but 5 wins as a starter in 6 games is pretty good....
 

Goingfor9

All-Conference
Jan 27, 2003
15,248
1,593
113
I know he isn't doing everything text book or perfect, but I think that Stephen Johnson has earned the right to be the man going forward at qb...yes, he has some things to work on, but I think that with continuted practice reps and now with the extra month of bowl practices he has great upside and I love his cool demeanor on the field...what say you?

Johnson isn't even under center half the time. If we had a real passing threat we would be top 15 team
 

megablue

Heisman
Oct 2, 2012
13,481
13,080
113
Next spring, best player plays, at every position.

To do otherwise would be foolish.

End of story.

Thanks for playing, what's next?

It goes without saying that, unless there are team rules violations, academic problems or injuries, there is no reason for any player to be playing if he doesn't deserve it. I agree with Rockford >>>> Of course >>>>> BEST PLAYER PLAYS !!
 

megablue

Heisman
Oct 2, 2012
13,481
13,080
113
As i said, I am not knocking Johnson, but I think the improvement in the OL and "finding" Bennie has more to do with our improved offense than anything else. Using Conrad as a big mobile blocker also helps. The fact that the D has to worry a lot more about our running game also really helps the passing game now, along with not having as many third and long situations.

Like Woody said long ago, three things can happen when you throw the ball, and two of them are bad------although with the emphasis on the PI calls and passing in general that may not be quite as true any more. BUT I think we have more excellent
receivers (nothing to laugh about) than ever before and I think a balanced attack is the hardest to defend.
You are discounting Johnson's ability to run and his cool, calm leadership abilities.
 
Last edited:
Feb 21, 2006
8,403
9,162
0
For the first time in a while UK has some stability on offense and specifically at the QB position. As a result an identity and confidence to produce within the framework of that identity has developed.

Folks can point out all the flaws and it's fair, but it is also important to realize that SJ hasn't been with this team for a full year yet and he is still learning how to play at this level of football.

Not naming him starter early on in the off season would be a tragedy. We don't need another QB competition where nobody gets a lions share of the reps and the team doesn't really know who to rally around.

A full off season of work with the first team and the confidence of having the full team and staff behind him will allow SJ to really improve as a player and put the staff n team in a position to use the momentum from this season to take the next step.

Uncertainty really halts progress. I can't be for sure but I feel like DB is a totally different QB that would require the offense to maybe change from what it is.

Sometimes you need to roll with the mojo in life.

Maybe last season with the way things went, it was appropriate to hit the reset button on the QB and change offenses after the season. Right now things are rolling, don't believe anything drastic is required.
 

Larry00

Senior
Oct 6, 2005
388
413
32
I stated this on another forum thread...

I'm going to be very interested in NEXT YEAR's Stephen Johnson. We seem to have always had much better luck with JUCO transfers in their Senior season vs their Junior years. He has a funny passing release that I think they could tinker with and improve. He has more allusive ability that helps with the run/read option, but the young man needs to eat a couple of pizzas!! I don't think a 200/205# Stepehen Johnson with more strength, loses the fumble as much, or goes down on a pocket tackle as easy.
 

Katwatcher

Sophomore
Feb 17, 2003
563
153
0
If we go out and win them all then I don't think there is any way the coaches can replace Johnson. They may have an "open" competition but it would likely just be as a favor to Barker rather than really looking to replace Johnson. Again, I think there is more to this than just who is better because that could mean so many different things. Barker might be better moving the offense, but a faster offense may put our defense in a bad spot and cause us to also give up more points. So, it might be more productive for us, in the in column, to have Johnson. The effect of those wins will also lead UK players to really back Johnson and wouldn't want him replaced, so that could really hurt team moral as well.
I don't think the coaching staff is interested in doing any favors "whatever that means" for any player. They will choose who plays and gets things done.

The coaching staff knows how to handle player competition and will do whats right.In fact they are doing a lot of things right. They will play the player whose talent best fits the situation, regardless of who he is.
This is a team game and all players should know that the coaches know best.

This qb situation has been handled well by the coaches. They started the right QB and also had the backup ready in case of injury. It couldn't have worked out any better.
 

bgognat02

Freshman
Oct 30, 2016
213
59
0
Barker won't even be in the discussion for starter at UK next season. Hopefully the kid has a wonderful career wherever he chooses to transfer. He helped build a great recruiting class and I am grateful he wanted so badly to help make UK relevant again. He should have had more of a chance last year to show what he could bring to the table. Unfortunately for him, that wasn't the case.

Stephen Johnson has had the benefit of not being a KY native, which kept a lot of pressure off of him and has allowed him to move on quickly from mistakes and learn in a much calmer environment. The team is behind him now and they recognize that it was SP that has helped lead them back to relevance. The future of this team is in his hands now, unless he just completely does a 180 and regresses it will stay that way next year. Again, hate it for the KY kid (Barker) that helped us so much before ever playing a snap, but he'll be okay wherever he winds up if keeps maturing and working hard on his game.
 

brianpoe

Heisman
Mar 25, 2009
27,769
21,825
113
Barker won't even be in the discussion for starter at UK next season. Hopefully the kid has a wonderful career wherever he chooses to transfer. He helped build a great recruiting class and I am grateful he wanted so badly to help make UK relevant again. He should have had more of a chance last year to show what he could bring to the table. Unfortunately for him, that wasn't the case.

Stephen Johnson has had the benefit of not being a KY native, which kept a lot of pressure off of him and has allowed him to move on quickly from mistakes and learn in a much calmer environment. The team is behind him now and they recognize that it was SP that has helped lead them back to relevance. The future of this team is in his hands now, unless he just completely does a 180 and regresses it will stay that way next year. Again, hate it for the KY kid (Barker) that helped us so much before ever playing a snap, but he'll be okay wherever he winds up if keeps maturing and working hard on his game.


If Drew comes back healthy he will compete for the job.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Beatle Bum

sluggercatfan

Heisman
Aug 17, 2004
35,953
29,631
0
I stated this on another forum thread...

I'm going to be very interested in NEXT YEAR's Stephen Johnson. We seem to have always had much better luck with JUCO transfers in their Senior season vs their Junior years. He has a funny passing release that I think they could tinker with and improve. He has more allusive ability that helps with the run/read option, but the young man needs to eat a couple of pizzas!! I don't think a 200/205# Stepehen Johnson with more strength, loses the fumble as much, or goes down on a pocket tackle as easy.
Just think going to a bowl game is going to be like having two spring practices.
 
  • Like
Reactions: brianpoe

GonzoCat90

Heisman
Mar 30, 2009
32,377
34,559
0
Some odd posts in this thread. Let's maybe wait and see before we just transfer Barker out of the program.

The good news about Johnson is that he has shown himself to be a guy you don't have to coddle. Some QB's couldn't accept an open competition after the year he's having. Doesn't seem like he's wired that way. He's taken every bit of criticism on the chin and owned it completely. Huge leadership quality.
 

mrhotdice

All-American
Nov 1, 2002
21,923
5,450
0
As i said, I am not knocking Johnson, but I think the improvement in the OL and "finding" Bennie has more to do with our improved offense than anything else. Using Conrad as a big mobile blocker also helps. The fact that the D has to worry a lot more about our running game also really helps the passing game now, along with not having as many third and long situations.

Like Woody said long ago, three things can happen when you throw the ball, and two of them are bad------although with the emphasis on the PI calls and passing in general that may not be quite as true any more. BUT I think we have more excellent
receivers (nothing to laugh about) than ever before and I think a balanced attack is the hardest to defend.
I don't think it was Woody, I seem to remember it was Darell Royal at Texas. But whatever if you can't run the ball in the SEC your doomed.
 

Katwatcher

Sophomore
Feb 17, 2003
563
153
0
Barker won't even be in the discussion for starter at UK next season. Hopefully the kid has a wonderful career wherever he chooses to transfer. He helped build a great recruiting class and I am grateful he wanted so badly to help make UK relevant again. He should have had more of a chance last year to show what he could bring to the table. Unfortunately for him, that wasn't the case.

Stephen Johnson has had the benefit of not being a KY native, which kept a lot of pressure off of him and has allowed him to move on quickly from mistakes and learn in a much calmer environment. The team is behind him now and they recognize that it was SP that has helped lead them back to relevance. The future of this team is in his hands now, unless he just completely does a 180 and regresses it will stay that way next year. Again, hate it for the KY kid (Barker) that helped us so much before ever playing a snap, but he'll be okay wherever he winds up if keeps maturing and working hard on his game.
I must have missed it, when did Barker say he was transferring?
 

Blueaz

Heisman
Jul 7, 2009
27,984
30,120
113
Barker won't even be in the discussion for starter at UK next season. Hopefully the kid has a wonderful career wherever he chooses to transfer. He helped build a great recruiting class and I am grateful he wanted so badly to help make UK relevant again. He should have had more of a chance last year to show what he could bring to the table. Unfortunately for him, that wasn't the case.

Stephen Johnson has had the benefit of not being a KY native, which kept a lot of pressure off of him and has allowed him to move on quickly from mistakes and learn in a much calmer environment. The team is behind him now and they recognize that it was SP that has helped lead them back to relevance. The future of this team is in his hands now, unless he just completely does a 180 and regresses it will stay that way next year. Again, hate it for the KY kid (Barker) that helped us so much before ever playing a snap, but he'll be okay wherever he winds up if keeps maturing and working hard on his game.
Ok, ok...this has to be umm...
armirite?
And who is SP? Pith?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: brianpoe

bgognat02

Freshman
Oct 30, 2016
213
59
0
Look at the Johnson/Smith threads over the past few weeks and tell me SJ got a break because he was not a Kentucky kid. Lol
I never said the fans gave him a break. I said he's not a KY native and doesn't feel the same pressure that was on Drew and Patrick, both KY natives, to turn the program around. I think it's been a huge benefit to him and enables him to move on past mistakes a lot easier.
 

tntuk

Heisman
Jan 17, 2002
11,530
11,040
113
Just have another competition in the spring . The question is would the offense be better with Barker and I think it would . Based on his ability to throw deeper and more accurate , it would compliment the running game even more . Johnson has played well with the exceptions of turnovers and accuracy issues . I think teams are going to all out stack the box the rest of our games and try to force Johnson to beat them throwing , he needs to keep them honest .
Mizzou had 8 in the box quite a bit Saturday and we were still able to run it down their throats. Not saying their D is that good, but 8 in the box, you should be able to stop the run everytime.

I hope UGA stacks the box. I think SJ's passing is good enough (not great, but good enough) to keep them honest.
 

Deeeefense

Heisman
Staff member
Aug 22, 2001
44,076
51,050
113
I would not put it beyond Gran to consider a two QB system next year. Johnson/Barker or Johnson/Hoak.
Advantage is it makes it much more difficult for defenses to prepare for two different QBs, running different packages, and it gives you tremendous flexibility to run whatever style you want to run against various defenses in different situations.

AT any rate I hope they use the right guy(s) becasue next year with 90% of this team returning we have the opportunity for an exceptional season including a trip to CATLANTA.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tntuk

cardkilla_rivals379685

All-Conference
May 10, 2002
2,076
1,695
0
Really hard to say. In Barker's first half, he was exceptional, made some NFL throws, hitting tight windows, all the things you want out of a QB.

But Johnson is winning, which is the most important thing in football. That means alot to coaches.

Will be an interesting spring that's for sure. I believe all 3 QBs will get plenty of chances to win the starting job. 2017 is too important for the coaches to make the wrong decision.

Alot depends on these next 4 games. To win the East next year, we have to beat teams like Ole Miss, Florida, Georgia and Tenn. Is Johnson a capable enough QB to win those games?

If he shows up in the spring over 200lbs and with improved accuracy, may be hard to beat out.