So there's much debate over holding them in an LLC vs personal. It comes down to the type of loan you can get in personal name vs LLC (and at what rate). Yes, they are in his name. I guess the theory is If you are holding them in your name, you take a large umbrella policy out. I'm by no means an expert at insurance or law, so for those that are, I'd love to hear your opinions. TIA.
Holding them in an LLC helps to create a buffer between your personal assets and the exposure a commercial operation like home rental creates.
I understand the potential loan benefits in holding them in your personal name, but I don't think that they outweigh the risk. It is also why I would recommend people with vacation homes, boats, etc set up an LLC to own them under. Especially boats if you have teenagers or young adult children that will be operating them.
With rental properties it's not a matter of if the landlord will be sued for something, it's a matter of when - how often and how serious the situation is.
I will say for most serious owners of rental properties (more than one or two) there is very little debate as to whether or not utilize an LLC. If the loan benefits are that great, I would recommend finding a new lender.