Why would Nebraska pay Elliot?
You missed the earlier post, they were talking Pelini.
Why would Nebraska pay Elliot?
What I'm saying is stoops is now doing his job for him. He is calling the plays, not Eliot. We are giving almost 600 grand to basically a glorified LBer coach. If the CEO has to do the general managers job then there's not a reason to keep the general manager.So, If they were spending twice that on a new DC for the same results, you'd be okay with it?
Bottom line is, if they spend what they spend and are producing, why does it matter who makes what?
Thank You! This is a young team they where going to struggle some early. Eliot is a proven coach and he handles all the gameplanning and also tells coach Stoops what he sees upstairs. You dont fire a quality coach who you have 20 years experience withThere are HCs all over college football who are their own OC/DC both in name and in reality. Eliot is also OLB coach(read Allen/Ware) and those guys are playing pretty well. He stays.
I understand. My point being, UK could be out the buyout for Eliot and the cost of the sho-nuff level DC the folks in this thread are clamoring for... and there is no guarantee the defense would improve more than it has this year.What I'm saying is stoops is now doing his job for him. He is calling the plays, not Eliot. We are giving almost 600 grand to basically a glorified LBer coach. If the CEO has to do the general managers job then there's not a reason to keep the general manager.
Not going to count the money that Nebraska is paying him?
I dont think Stoops will fire him.
Why would I, it's irrelevant. He would still get Nebraska money if he came to UK as DC, but get paid more as a UK DC than a YSU head coach.