No topic has dominated the discussion around college football recruiting over the past year more than <a href="https://www.on3.com/nil/">NIL</a>.



Starting on July 1, 2021, NCAA rules allowed college-student athletes to profit off their NIL for the first time. But on the high school level, it’s been a piecemeal situation. Currently, only <a href="https://www.on3.com/nil/laws/high-school/">14 athletic associations</a> allow high school athletes to profit off their NIL without losing their eligibility.



Even with the fragmentation, NIL has become one of the most polarizing topics on the recruiting trail. Nobody will ever forget <a href="https://www.on3.com/teams/alabama-crimson-tide/">Alabama</a> head coach <a href="https://www.on3.com/news/best-nick-saban-quotes-on-leadership-success-team-and-inspiration/">Nick Saban</a>’s <a href="https://www.on3.com/college/alabama-crimson-tide/news/nick-saban-calls-out-jimbo-fisher-texas-am-for-nil-recruiting-methods-buying-players/">claim</a> that <a href="https://www.on3.com/teams/texas-am-aggies/">Texas A&M</a> “bought every player on their team” with <a href="https://www.on3.com/nil/deals/">NIL deals</a>. And other coaches across the country, including <a href="https://www.on3.com/teams/penn-state-nittany-lions/">Penn State</a>’s James Franklin, have <a href="https://www.on3.com/nil/news/does-nil-trump-perfect-recruiting-pitch-coaches-across-country-weigh-in/">suggested over and over that college recruiters can’t compete against a lucrative NIL deal</a>. Furthermore, many coaches say NIL has become the ultimate recruiting tool through “pay-for-play” deals.



There have been plenty of people talking about NIL over the past year. But one voice has been missing from the dialogue – the high-profile recruits themselves.



That’s why On3 deployed an exclusive survey in June and July to get honest and unfiltered feedback from star high-school prospects about how NIL impacts their recruitments. On3 surveyed 85 of the players ranked in the top 200 of the <a href="https://www.on3.com/db/rankings/consensus-player/football/2023/">On3 Consensus</a>. On3 asked the prospects a series of 11 questions with additional follow-up queries based on their initial responses. The survey received responses from prospects in the top 25 talent-producing states in the country. It included a proportional concentration from top talent states like Texas, Florida, California, Georgia and Louisiana.



On3 also conducted follow-up interviews after the results were tabulated for additional analysis. We gave the recruits anonymity in the interviews and on the survey so they could speak freely on the subject.



It’s truly the first time recruiting observers get an inside view of how five and four-star prospects – the future stars of college football – view NIL and its impact on their recruitments.



On3 will highlight the key results from the survey in this story. But throughout the rest of the week, On3 goes in-depth on some of the most noticeable results from the survey and follow-up interviews.



<h2 id="h-30-of-top-recruits-open-to-taking-nil-deal-over-perfect-fit">30% of top recruits open to taking NIL deal over perfect fit</h2>



The first survey question focused on whether or not recruits would be willing to go to a school that isn’t a perfect fit from a football or academic standpoint for a NIL deal.



Thirty percent of the recruits surveyed said they would be willing to go to a school that’s not a perfect fit for a NIL deal. An example of some of the players that responded yes to this question included a pair of highly-ranked quarterbacks, multiple defensive ends and receivers from Florida, a couple of defensive backs from Texas, several defenders from Georgia, and a handful of defensive backs each from Alabama, Mississippi and Louisiana.



While the 30% result is significant, several recruiters believe prospects might not have been truly honest in answering that question.



“I’d have to think that number is probably around 50-50,” a Pac-12 coordinator told On3. “It’s no longer about culture. We have kids come to our school on a visit and say, ‘We love you. Love you, coach. Love your scheme. It’s a great fit. But what can you offer?’”



<h2>NIL ranks in middle when it comes to deciding</h2>



On3 also asked the 85 prospects to rank where NIL factors in when making their college decision. On a scale from one to 10 – with 10 being the highest – 22.9% of the prospects said NIL ranked right in the middle at a five. After that 15.7% said it ranked as a seven, 13.3% ranked it as a three and 10.8% ranked it as an eight.



All in all, 57% of the recruits said NIL ranked as a five or higher in their decision. This type of data indicates NIL is definitely playing a factor on the recruiting trail.



<h2>Coaching staff, NFL development more important than NIL</h2>



However, another survey question maybe gives us a better indication of just where NIL stands in top recruits’ decision-making process.



On3 asked the 85 prospects to rank in order of importance what they care most about when picking a school. The overwhelming top response was coaching staff and NFL development. From there, academics were second, scheme fit/early playing time was third, tradition/history was fourth, facilities were fifth, NIL was sixth and distance from home was seventh.



“That’s actually a pretty good thing to see,” an SEC recruiter told On3. “I think these results show that, yes, NIL is important with a lot of these top guys. But maybe there’s actually some hope that traditional recruiting factors are still important.”



<h2>31% of recruits have been contacted by a collective</h2>



<a href="https://www.on3.com/nil/collectives/">Collectives</a> in NIL have become <a href="https://www.on3.com/nil/news/90-percent-of-ads-polled-concerned-nil-used-as-improper-recruiting-tool/">lightning rods in college athletics</a> over the past six months. Coaches say NIL disguises “pay-for-play” deals choreographed by collectives. Collectives are groups of boosters that pool funds to help facilitate NIL deals for athletes. Coaches say the groups are using money to persuade recruits and target players on other college teams.



With that in mind, it is interesting to see that 31.8% of the recruits surveyed say they have been contacted by a collective to do a NIL agreement with them. Many of the prospects that responded yes to this question would not reveal what schools the collectives represented.



Additionally, a highly touted offensive player that responded yes said he received an offer for “$3.7 million” from a collective. On3 has not been able to verify the claimed offer.



Moreover, 7.4% of the recruits that responded said they asked for more money from a collective.



An overwhelming majority of the recruits – 90.6% – said coaches have not put them in contact with collectives. However, it’s important to keep in mind in most states it’s not permissible for college coaches to directly or indirectly arrange for collectives to provide compensation to a student-athlete through NIL. However, that is <a href="https://www.on3.com/nil/news/how-are-recruiters-working-with-nil-collectives-in-states-where-its-allowed/">quickly changing in some states</a> thanks to new laws that have been repealed or amended. So, this might be a question to revisit later on down the road.



<h2>Recruits are talking to each other about NIL</h2>



Another fascinating result from the survey is that 64.7% of the recruits said they are talking with other recruits about NIL deals. Plus, 38.2% of the recruits said they are comparing their NIL offers with other players they talk with.



Those results seem to make a lot of sense when looking additionally at the responses to the question – how do recruits figure out what they’re worth when it comes to NIL deals?



A large majority of the recruits said they were unsure of how to calculate their worth from a NIL standpoint. Multiple mentioned they use the <a href="https://www.on3.com/nil/news/about-on3-nil-valuation-per-post-value/">On3 NIL Valuation</a> as a guide to gauge their value. But many said they turn to their peers for support.



“All of us top guys talk, so we know what everyone is getting,” a highly ranked Texas offensive recruit said. “We can use that knowledge piece to determine our own value by comparison.”



<h2>Additional NIL recruit survey results</h2>



<ul><li>Only 11.8% of the recruits say they are working with a lawyer on a NIL contract. Of the recruits that said yes, 80% said they reached out to a lawyer on their own instead of the lawyer reaching out to them or their family.</li><li>With NIL restrictions different all over the map in high school, some prospects have made moves to different states. However, 80% of the recruits surveyed said they would not be willing to move to a different state to sign a NIL deal while in high school. </li><li>Similarly, 85.7% of the recruits surveyed said they would not be willing to reclassify or skip their senior season of high school football to sign a NIL deal.</li></ul>

High School NIL News

On3 exclusive: Top recruits open up about NIL’s influence

Teams

Fan Sites

Forums

Shows

team-link

College Football News

College Football Player Rankings

College Football Rankings

College Football Playoff

College Basketball News

Women's Sports

College

NIL News

NIL Valuation

NIL Deals

NIL Deal Tracker

Sports Business

Transfer Portal News

NCAA Transfer Portal News

NCAA Transfer Portal

Transfer Portal Rankings

Transfer Portal Team Rankings

Transfer Portal

NCAA Transfer Portal Home

Football Recruiting

Basketball Recruiting

Database

Team Rankings

Player Rankings

Industry Comparison

Commitments

Recruiting Prediction Machine

Recruiting

High School News

Schools

High School Search

Rankings

High School Rankings

Scores

High School Scores

High School

NFL Draft

NFL Draft News

Draft By Stars

College Draft History

College Draft Totals

NBA Draft

NBA Draft News

Draft

NASCAR

Culture

Sports Betting

About

On3 App

Advertise

Press

Contact

Football

Basketball

Women's Basketball

Softball

Baseball

News

Deals

Recruits

Events

Newsletter

Alabama

Arizona State

Arizona

Arkansas

Auburn

Baylor

Boston College

California

Removed

Clemson

Colorado

Duke

Florida

Florida State

Georgia

Georgia Tech

Illinois

Indiana

Iowa

Iowa State

Kansas

Kansas State

Kentucky

Lettermen Row

Lettermen Lounge

Louisville

Maryland

Miami

Michigan State

Michigan

Minnesota

Mississippi State

Missouri

NC State

Nebraska

North Carolina

Northwestern

Notre Dame

Ohio State

Oklahoma

Oklahoma State

Ole Miss

The Main Board

Oregon

Oregon State

Penn State

Pittsburgh

Purdue

Rutgers

South Carolina

Stanford

Syracuse

Tennessee

Texas A&M

Texas

Texas Tech

UCLA

Utah

Vanderbilt

Virginia

Virginia Tech

Wake Forest

Washington

Washington State

West Virginia

Wisconsin

BamaOnLine

BOL Round Table

Inside Texas

IT Members Only

DawgsHQ

Dawg Walk

Scoop Duck

Recruiting & Sports

AuburnSports

The Corner

WeAreSC

GarryP's Trojan Huddle

The Wolverine

The Fort

The Lions Den

The Wolfpacker

The Wolves’ Den

GatorsOnline

Swamp Talk

Alabama A&M

Alabama State

Albany

Alcorn State

Abilene Christian

Appalachian State

Akron

Army

Austin Peay

Arkansas-Pine Bluff

Arkansas-Little Rock

Arkansas State

Air Force

Ball State

American

Wofford

Winthrop

Wisconsin-Milwaukee

Wisconsin-Green Bay

Wichita State

Western Carolina

Volleyball

Gymnastics

Men's Lacrosse

Women's Lacrosse

Men's Soccer

Women's Soccer

Women's Track

Men's Golf

Women's Golf

Men's Hockey

Women's Hockey

Men's Swimming

Women's Swimming

Wrestling

Men's Tennis

Women's Tennis

Annual $1

Annual Premium

Annual $1 

Monthly

Annual

Unlimited Access to This and All Articles.

Article (On3 Plus Rivals)

Forum (On3 Plus Rivals)

Intro

On3 exclusive: Top recruits open up about NIL’s influence

Cooper Barkate

Mark Pope

Gary Patterson

Crain & Cone

Transfer Portal Intel