After Action Review: Florida

On3 imageby:Freddie Maggard09/13/16

An After Action Review, or AAR, is a militaristic method to analyze the success or failure of an intended action/mission. Here we go:

WHAT WERE INTENDED RESULTS

-- Win the football game

WHAT WERE ACTUAL RESULTS

-- Lost the football game 7-45

WHAT CAUSED OUR RESULTS (Why did it happen)

-- Inability to slow the run or pass: Rushing--50 rushes, 244 yards. Passing–19-31, 320-yards, 4 TD’s, 0 INT’s.

-- Not stopping UF on 3rd down: Gators 14-20, ran 83 offensive plays, and won Time of Possession 37:26 to 22:34.

-- Passing game absence: Drew Barker 2-10, 10 yards, 3 INT’s. Stephen Johnson: 1-3, 45-yards.

-- Lack of pass rush; Kentucky did not register a quarterback sack.

-- 4/12 on third down. Wildcats could not initiate or sustain an offensive drive. UK totaled 48 offensive plays.

-- Surrendering explosive plays: Antonio Calloway 78-yard touchdown reception. UF 5 QB sacks, 3 INT’s.

-- Lost turnover ratio: Florida 1 INT. Kentucky 3 INT’s, 1 lost fumble.

WHAT WILL WE SUSTAIN? IMPROVE? (What can we do better next time?)

Sustain

-- Special Teams (minus missed FG). Kentucky did not surrender a Special Team’s explosive play.

-- True freshman Punter Grant McKinniss: 5 punts, 43.4 yards per.   

-- RB Boom Williams yards after contact, effort, and production: 12 rushes, 70-yards, 5.5 yards per carry.

Improve:

-- Everything else

Discuss This Article

Comments have moved.

Join the conversation and talk about this article and all things Kentucky Sports in the new KSR Message Board.

KSBoard

2024-04-18