Toggle sidebar

Michael Irvin taken off the NFL network for a 45 sec conversation?

B

Bwifan

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
1,753
3,128
113
s1uggo72 said:
hmmm what did Irv say?? Was she under cover??
profootballtalk.nbcsports.com

NFL Network pulls Michael Irvin after misconduct complaint

Hall of Famer Michael Irvin has made a quick exit from NFL Network's coverage of Super Bowl LVII, following an allegation of misconduct recently made against him.
profootballtalk.nbcsports.com profootballtalk.nbcsports.com
Click to expand...

Well if it happened in the lobby should be cameras to verify no inappropriate touching. Will show how long they talked and if her face looked offended or awkward during the conversation. Short of anything weird being displayed its a he said/she said thing and he should be on the air, given his history I can see why they pulled him.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: step.eng69
L

LB99

Well-known member
Oct 27, 2021
7,112
9,555
113
While I disliked Irv the player, I find him entertaining on the NFL Network. He sometimes takes a perspective or compliments someone or something that I didnā€™t expect him to, so I respect him for that. With that said, if he did something inappropriate, then they did what they had to do. We will see, I guess?
 
Psu00

Psu00

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
1,273
1,820
113
Has anyone read what this is actually about from another source that actually had details?
 
NittPicker

NittPicker

Well-known member
Oct 7, 2021
4,658
9,545
113
"....a woman complained about Irvinā€™s behavior during an encounter that occurred on Sunday evening in Arizona."

I'm not a huge Irvin fan and maybe over time more facts may come out. But he's in the penalty box because a woman "complained" about his behavior?? Is that all it takes nowadays?? Maybe it was like a drunk Namath talking to Kolber on the sideline. Would that be enough for Irvin to get the boot??
 
  • Like
Reactions: bbrown and Iionscott
nittanyfan333

nittanyfan333

Well-known member
Oct 6, 2021
2,974
5,883
113
I hate Irving as much as the next eagles fan, but this is a jokeā€¦.. how about we stop treating everyone as if theyā€™re guilty until proven innocent?

ā€œMichael Irvin will not be a part of NFL Networkā€™s Super Bowl LVII week coverage,ā€ NFL Media spokesperson Alex Riethmiller said in a statement to Gehlken.ā€ Before anything even remotely resembling an investigation???
 
  • Like
Reactions: dcf4psu and bbrown
M

MrTailgate

Well-known member
Oct 19, 2021
862
1,605
93
For Godā€™s sake, hard to be ā€œThe playmakerā€ if he isnā€™t a player.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Whart
GrimReaper

GrimReaper

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
6,419
8,873
113
nittanyfan333 said:
I hate Irving as much as the next eagles fan, but this is a jokeā€¦.. how about we stop treating everyone as if theyā€™re guilty until proven innocent?

ā€œMichael Irvin will not be a part of NFL Networkā€™s Super Bowl LVII week coverage,ā€ NFL Media spokesperson Alex Riethmiller said in a statement to Gehlken.ā€ Before anything even remotely resembling an investigation???
Click to expand...
Unless there is an audio tape, or a witness to the conversation, Irvin is in deep kimchee. In a later interview, he admitted that he couldn't remember what he said because he'd been drinking. So it becomes a case of "she said" because he can't recall what "he said."
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: step.eng69, PSUHarry and saturdaysarebetter
C

Chatz5531

Active member
Oct 7, 2021
286
660
63
steve carell anchorman GIF
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Connorpozlee
laKavosiey-st lion

laKavosiey-st lion

Well-known member
Oct 30, 2021
9,663
6,764
113
Moms and I are lazing around one Sunday am and Mike comes on the tv, she says ā€œthat guy picked up my dropped scarf at the airport last monday am and called me maā€™am ā€œ
weā€™re on mikes side here
 
  • Like
Reactions: s1uggo72
BW Lion

BW Lion

Well-known member
Oct 14, 2021
3,103
2,436
113
  • Like
Reactions: step.eng69 and s1uggo72
JerseyLion

JerseyLion

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2021
766
1,585
93
If he was drunk and it was only 45 seconds, I donā€™t know how anyone would even be able to understand him enough to get offended. Itā€™s not like heā€™s the clearest speaker when heā€™s sober.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BobPSU92 and s1uggo72
Nitt1300

Nitt1300

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
5,455
10,398
113

Marriott must respond Michael Irvinā€™s request for surveillance video by Tuesday​

97
Mike Florio
Fri, February 24, 2023 at 10:42 PM EST


A Marriott employee has accused Hall of Fame receiver Michael Irvin of misconduct. The accusation got Irvin pulled from a pair of TV jobs during Super Bowl week.
Irvin has responded with a $100 million lawsuit, and an aggressive effort to get any surveillance video that Marriott has in its possession that would demonstrate what actually happened between Irvin and his accuser. The federal judge that is now presiding over the case has given Marriott a firm deadline for responding Irvinā€™s request for the video.
Via Michael Gehlken of the Dallas Morning News, Marriott has until 5:00 p.m. CT on Tuesday to respond. That doesnā€™t mean the video must be produced by then; it only means that Marriott must submit an actual response. A word-salad of objections (something lawyers paid handsomely by the hour pride themselves on whipping up) likely will be the front-line reply.
Marriott previously objected to the request when the case was pending in state court, firing off the predictable and common assertion of the attorney-client privilege and work-product doctrine as justification. If Marriott does it again, Irvinā€™s lawyers will file a motion to compel the production of the materials, and the judge will have to make a decision.
Itā€™s hard to imagine how or why the judge would allow Marriott to hide relevant evidence that goes directly to the question of whether Irvin engaged in any type of wrongdoing.
It feels like Marriott has something to hide, because this is exactly what something with something to hide would do.
Marriott must respond Michael Irvinā€™s request for surveillance video by Tuesday originally appeared on Pro Football Talk
 
Psu00

Psu00

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
1,273
1,820
113
Nitt1300 said:

Marriott must respond Michael Irvinā€™s request for surveillance video by Tuesday​

97
Mike Florio
Fri, February 24, 2023 at 10:42 PM EST


A Marriott employee has accused Hall of Fame receiver Michael Irvin of misconduct. The accusation got Irvin pulled from a pair of TV jobs during Super Bowl week.
Irvin has responded with a $100 million lawsuit, and an aggressive effort to get any surveillance video that Marriott has in its possession that would demonstrate what actually happened between Irvin and his accuser. The federal judge that is now presiding over the case has given Marriott a firm deadline for responding Irvinā€™s request for the video.
Via Michael Gehlken of the Dallas Morning News, Marriott has until 5:00 p.m. CT on Tuesday to respond. That doesnā€™t mean the video must be produced by then; it only means that Marriott must submit an actual response. A word-salad of objections (something lawyers paid handsomely by the hour pride themselves on whipping up) likely will be the front-line reply.
Marriott previously objected to the request when the case was pending in state court, firing off the predictable and common assertion of the attorney-client privilege and work-product doctrine as justification. If Marriott does it again, Irvinā€™s lawyers will file a motion to compel the production of the materials, and the judge will have to make a decision.
Itā€™s hard to imagine how or why the judge would allow Marriott to hide relevant evidence that goes directly to the question of whether Irvin engaged in any type of wrongdoing.
It feels like Marriott has something to hide, because this is exactly what something with something to hide would do.
Marriott must respond Michael Irvinā€™s request for surveillance video by Tuesday originally appeared on Pro Football Talk
Click to expand...
Thatā€™s interesting. If youā€™re Marriott why would you not show the video?

How did this go from state court to Federal court in such a short time?
 
  • Like
Reactions: bbrown
bbrown

bbrown

Well-known member
Nov 1, 2021
10,632
22,271
113
Psu00 said:
Thatā€™s interesting. If youā€™re Marriott why would you not show the video?

How did this go from state court to Federal court in such a short time?
Click to expand...
+1 about the video. I also "heard" that there was a phone camera video that disputes the Marriot and the employees claim along with some eye witnesses
Mike I. does have a history but this seems more than a little odd.
I'm surprised he (Mike) and his lawyers didn't include NFL Network in the suit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Psu00
bbrown

bbrown

Well-known member
Nov 1, 2021
10,632
22,271
113
Nitt1300 said:

Marriott must respond Michael Irvinā€™s request for surveillance video by Tuesday​

97
Mike Florio
Fri, February 24, 2023 at 10:42 PM EST


A Marriott employee has accused Hall of Fame receiver Michael Irvin of misconduct. The accusation got Irvin pulled from a pair of TV jobs during Super Bowl week.
Irvin has responded with a $100 million lawsuit, and an aggressive effort to get any surveillance video that Marriott has in its possession that would demonstrate what actually happened between Irvin and his accuser. The federal judge that is now presiding over the case has given Marriott a firm deadline for responding Irvinā€™s request for the video.
Via Michael Gehlken of the Dallas Morning News, Marriott has until 5:00 p.m. CT on Tuesday to respond. That doesnā€™t mean the video must be produced by then; it only means that Marriott must submit an actual response. A word-salad of objections (something lawyers paid handsomely by the hour pride themselves on whipping up) likely will be the front-line reply.
Marriott previously objected to the request when the case was pending in state court, firing off the predictable and common assertion of the attorney-client privilege and work-product doctrine as justification. If Marriott does it again, Irvinā€™s lawyers will file a motion to compel the production of the materials, and the judge will have to make a decision.
Itā€™s hard to imagine how or why the judge would allow Marriott to hide relevant evidence that goes directly to the question of whether Irvin engaged in any type of wrongdoing.
It feels like Marriott has something to hide, because this is exactly what something with something to hide would do.
Marriott must respond Michael Irvinā€™s request for surveillance video by Tuesday originally appeared on Pro Football Talk
Click to expand...
+1
 
P

psupride1997

Well-known member
Oct 25, 2021
478
801
93
Thereā€™s not enough time to go through all the terrible things Michael Irvin has done in his lifetime, heā€™s one of the worst people on the planet. Anything bad that happens to him from here on out is delicious karma.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom