Oh yeah, ๐Ÿ˜

Rob Lewis_rivals

New member
Aug 27, 2001
251,678
4,320
0
Agree.
Bonus was having no injuries.
My only concern is how good the backup quarterbacks are. Beville has only done mop-up duty and Booty and Evers haven't played.
 

ppchj98

New member
Oct 22, 2006
0
2
0
Agree.
Bonus was having no injuries.
My only concern is how good the backup quarterbacks are. Beville has only done mop-up duty and Booty and Evers haven't played.
Gabriel and OUr online played fantastic today imo.
 

ETU

New member
Feb 5, 2003
58,648
4,720
0
Gabriel and OUr online played fantastic today imo.
Agree.
Bonus was having no injuries.
My only concern is how good the backup quarterbacks are. Beville has only done mop-up duty and Booty and Evers haven't played.
Not too many teams have great QBโ€™s as back ups. Beville appears to be adequate but Iโ€™m not concerned about Dillion getting injured. It is what it is.
 

ppchj98

New member
Oct 22, 2006
0
2
0
Not too many teams have great QBโ€™s as back ups. Beville appears to be adequate but Iโ€™m not concerned about Dillion getting injured. It is what it is.
And I'm really not confident with Beville. Not in the very least brother. ๐Ÿ‘
 

Rob Lewis_rivals

New member
Aug 27, 2001
251,678
4,320
0
Not too many teams have great QBโ€™s as back ups. Beville appears to be adequate but Iโ€™m not concerned about Dillion getting injured. It is what it is.
In a sport that gets more violent and dangerous each year, quality depth is more important than ever......especially for the most important position on the field.
Beville clearly is talented, but he needs to be turned loose at least for a couple of downs and not for the purpose of running up the score.
To Gabriel's credit, he knows when to slide or run to the sideline, as I'm sure most QB's know to do.
The 2000 team had backups Hybl and White behind Heupel. The 2008 team had Halzle and Jones behind Bradford. 2013 had Bell and Knight. 2017 had Mayfield, Murray and Kendall.
2023 will likely see some good players throughout the roster transferring out of OU. With Jackson Arnold arriving, my guess is that at least two QB's will transfer among Beville, Booty and Evers, especially if Gabriel stays.... which I think is likely, unless he gets good reviews from NFL scouts. Given the small number of really good QB's in the NFL, he might.
How "not concerned" would you be with OU facing Texas and OSU (and a few others) with any of OU's backups?
 

csregor

New member
Oct 18, 2005
44,992
957
0
Belville is a good QB. All of his plays with the exception of a couple have been hand-offs to the RB. He has not been turned loose to show us what he has. The OU crowd was chanting to let Belville throw the ball yesterday.
 

ETU

New member
Feb 5, 2003
58,648
4,720
0
In a sport that gets more violent and dangerous each year, quality depth is more important than ever......especially for the most important position on the field.
Beville clearly is talented, but he needs to be turned loose at least for a couple of downs and not for the purpose of running up the score.
To Gabriel's credit, he knows when to slide or run to the sideline, as I'm sure most QB's know to do.
The 2000 team had backups Hybl and White behind Heupel. The 2008 team had Halzle and Jones behind Bradford. 2013 had Bell and Knight. 2017 had Mayfield, Murray and Kendall.
2023 will likely see some good players throughout the roster transferring out of OU. With Jackson Arnold arriving, my guess is that at least two QB's will transfer among Beville, Booty and Evers, especially if Gabriel stays.... which I think is likely, unless he gets good reviews from NFL scouts. Given the small number of really good QB's in the NFL, he might.
How "not concerned" would you be with OU facing Texas and OSU (and a few others) with any of OU's backups?
I wouldnโ€™t like it, but Iโ€™m not going to spend my time worrying about something I have no control over. Thatโ€™s Brentโ€™s job. So if he can live with it, I can too.
 

mojo1fan

New member
Apr 28, 2002
7,496
2,688
0
Beville clearly is talented, but he needs to be turned loose at least for a couple of downs and not for the purpose of running up the score.

Belville is a good QB. All of his plays with the exception of a couple have been hand-offs to the RB. He has not been turned loose to show us what he has.

Thank you for posting this before I could. I don't know why seasoned fans cannot understand this.

Beville was handcuffed. On the other side, Purdy went in with the handcuffs removed - for a reason. The Huskers are looking for answers.
 
Last edited:

Rob Lewis_rivals

New member
Aug 27, 2001
251,678
4,320
0
I know Venables wanted Beville to run the clock late in the game. It was the right thing to do given the lopsided score. As a "seasoned fan" I can understand this.
And no, I don't spend time "worrying" about anything to do about OU football or sports in general. I'm too old for that.
My concern is an observation only....and I want it to become a meaningless concern when all is said and done, given the crowded QB corps (3 backups).
 

mojo1fan

New member
Apr 28, 2002
7,496
2,688
0
It was the right thing to do given the lopsided score. As a "seasoned fan" I can understand this.
I hope you picked up that I was thanking you and Scottsdale for posting your comments. It was exactly what I logged in to say.
 

ETU

New member
Feb 5, 2003
58,648
4,720
0
OU was very fortunate to have had great backups at QB for several years, but I think itโ€™s going to be much more difficult now that the NIL is in play. Maybe not. It may just be a question of how much schools (donor programs) are willing to pony up to ensure thereโ€™s someone standing on the sideline ready to take over. I still remember Jason White having to play injured in the title game with Thompson watching from the sidelines. That was painful.
 

Raysor

Well-known member
Mar 29, 2002
633
7,442
93
Agree.
Bonus was having no injuries.
My only concern is how good the backup quarterbacks are. Beville has only done mop-up duty and Booty and Evers haven't played.
I really wish they'd let the backup quarterbacks throw in mop up time. The only throw was behind the LOS. How can you evaluate a qb, or get him ready if he has to play important time later, if all you let him do is hand off, and run a keeper or two.
 

ppchj98

New member
Oct 22, 2006
0
2
0
I really wish they'd let the backup quarterbacks throw in mop up time. The only throw was behind the LOS. How can you evaluate a qb, or get him ready if he has to play important time later, if all you let him do is hand off, and run a keeper or two.
Yes, I want see what we've got waiting in the wings whether we have Gabriel here next season or not. Yesterday was perfect for just a taste. ๐Ÿ‘
 
Last edited:

atxhornfan

New member
Nov 22, 2003
0
1
0
Thank you for posting this before I could. I don't know why seasoned fans cannot understand this.

Beville was handcuffed. On the other side, Purdy went in with the handcuffs removed - for a reason. The Huskers are looking for answers.
I agree. I was down on Gabriel quick. Every game, every situation where he would make a mistake, I was ready to throw him under the bus. So, yeah I do feel bad about that and am so glad I was wrong.๐Ÿ˜
 

Raysor

Well-known member
Mar 29, 2002
633
7,442
93
I agree. I was down on Gabriel quick. Every game, every situation where he would make a mistake, I was ready to throw him under the bus. So, yeah I do feel bad about that and am so glad I was wrong.๐Ÿ˜
A lot of us are glad to be wrong when a player we doubted proves himself. I'm still anxious to see OUr offense against a quality defense on the road. But we'll see the best defense we've seen so far at 7 p.m. next Saturday. Gaylord Family Memorial should be rocking.
 

ksigcajun

New member
May 29, 2001
10,899
6,603
0
I'm not sure why there is hand-wringing with how many snaps or what type of plays Beville is getting. Gabriel goes down and we're done; we simply don't have a "QB2" on campus right now. Beville's development doesn't matter and he's already been recruited past. If you are interested in eking out a CCG or whatever with Beville, great, but we're not going to be competitive in the playoffs without Gabriel. This year is suddenly looking like a solid shot at something bigger....
 

ETU

New member
Feb 5, 2003
58,648
4,720
0
I'm not sure why there is hand-wringing with how many snaps or what type of plays Beville is getting. Gabriel goes down and we're done; we simply don't have a "QB2" on campus right now. Beville's development doesn't matter and he's already been recruited past. If you are interested in eking out a CCG or whatever with Beville, great, but we're not going to be competitive in the playoffs without Gabriel. This year is suddenly looking like a solid shot at something bigger....
Exactly. Nothing can be done about if Gabriel goes down. OU and 90% of the top 25.
 

Rob Lewis_rivals

New member
Aug 27, 2001
251,678
4,320
0
I'm not sure why there is hand-wringing with how many snaps or what type of plays Beville is getting. Gabriel goes down and we're done; we simply don't have a "QB2" on campus right now. Beville's development doesn't matter and he's already been recruited past. If you are interested in eking out a CCG or whatever with Beville, great, but we're not going to be competitive in the playoffs without Gabriel. This year is suddenly looking like a solid shot at something bigger....
This was what I thought as well. Keeping Gabriel healthy is without question a priority in keeping OU a playoff team and one that can compete against the elite team.... unlike the past.
 

Raysor

Well-known member
Mar 29, 2002
633
7,442
93
Saturday was perfect for turning Beville loose. Imo.
I agree with you. But I wonder if they might think they're a little short of wide receiver depth and don't want any of them getting hurt. But I just am concerned about growing the depth all over the offense, and some of that has to come from game reps. Especially for the guys who've never played at this level.
 

ppchj98

New member
Oct 22, 2006
0
2
0
I agree with you. But I wonder if they might think they're a little short of wide receiver depth and don't want any of them getting hurt. But I just am concerned about growing the depth all over the offense, and some of that has to come from game reps. Especially for the guys who've never played at this level.
We've got the receivers. Mims, Wease, Farooq. Three of the baddest wr's in cfb. Saturday was no time to hold back with Beville. Only my opinion brother. Maybe I'm getting away from myself. Wouldn't be the first time. ๐Ÿ˜
 

csregor

New member
Oct 18, 2005
44,992
957
0
Saturday was perfect for turning Beville loose. Imo.
OU could have scored another 21 to 28 points on Nebraska. BV was intentionally running the clock and I am certain he did not want to run up the score on Nebraska. I think Belville is far better than what others here think. I hope we get to see the full array of his skills this year.
 

ppchj98

New member
Oct 22, 2006
0
2
0
OU could have scored another 21 to 28 points on Nebraska. BV was intentionally running the clock and I am certain he did not want to run up the score on Nebraska. I think Belville is far better than what others here think. I hope we get to see the full array of his skills this year.
This thought is fine an dandy my man. My thoughts are exactly as I've presented them. ๐Ÿ˜
 

KMeyersNC

New member
Mar 29, 2002
42,270
627
0
OU could have scored another 21 to 28 points on Nebraska. BV was intentionally running the clock and I am certain he did not want to run up the score on Nebraska. I think Belville is far better than what others here think. I hope we get to see the full array of his skills this year.
I wish we would have ran it up a little. Nebby deserves it after what Osborne did all of those years