It was Gentle Thursday.
I sat on the lawn in front of Old Main and ate a gummy. Memories...
I sat on the lawn in front of Old Main and ate a gummy. Memories...
Sometimes it easier in equations for cancellation/factoring if you use a fraction.Why would you have to write it out as a fraction?
I thought there were 12 seconds per year. Jan 2nd, Feb 2nd, etc.Sometimes it easier in equations for cancellation/factoring if you use a fraction.
Since it’s Pi day, I’ll toss my favorite use of Pi in Physics and tie this in to your question. I learned this in High School physics. Basically, in relativistic equations, a couple things away keep coming up. They were the number of second per year, and the Constant Pi due to geometry or similar. It’s been wayyyyyyy too long to remember why.
In any event, How many seconds per year? Pi x10**7.
My teacher used to use that approximation al the time in reducing equations to pretty simple answers.
Back in the day it used to be Rolling Rock in tiny glasses with Ghigarelli’s pizzaOnly if the beer is served in tiny glasses.
How is such a series actually related to the ratio defining pi?My favorite series, Madhava’s series which dates to around 1400, 275 years before Gregory rediscovered it:
Pi= 4-4/3+4/5-4/7+4/9-4/11+…
Or diameter squared X .7854My favorite series, Madhava’s series which dates to around 1400, 275 years before Gregory rediscovered it:
Pi= 4-4/3+4/5-4/7+4/9-4/11+…
Madhava actually came up with an error formula (tells us how by much the sum can be off by). After n terms the error is (n^2+1)/(4n^3+5n). So as a tool to calculate pi, you can do much better. As I understand it, Ramanjuan’s ideas are the engine for the current algorithm to calculate the values of pi. (Something that doesn’t interest me at all, as I find it pointless.)How is such a series actually related to the ratio defining pi?