Red McCombs trying to lure the Raiders to San Antonio

ETU

New member
Feb 5, 2003
58,648
4,720
0
A while back, I heard for a good source that Red McCombs had a real interest is getting the LA Raiders to San Antonio, but there was nothing to confirm. Now that its out there I think it may become a possibility given Red's past connections with pro sports. If the San Diego Chargers move to LA, it could happen. Red is probably needing a team to root for nowadays.
 

John Otterstedt

New member
Jul 10, 2001
517,936
8,960
0
A while back, I heard for a good source that Red McCombs had a real interest is getting the LA Raiders to San Antonio, but there was nothing to confirm. Now that its out there I think it may become a possibility given Red's past connections with pro sports. If the San Diego Chargers move to LA, it could happen. Red is probably needing a team to root for nowadays.

that would be the Oakland Raiders. :)
 

phillinois

New member
Mar 10, 2003
39,047
7,368
0
Was I having a psychotic fugue or did I hear the Rams are headed back to LA?

Nope, I heard about it and some of the St. Louis fans are apoplectic with anger. Rightly so. I would be too.:mad:
 

John Otterstedt

New member
Jul 10, 2001
517,936
8,960
0
Was I having a psychotic fugue or did I hear the Rams are headed back to LA?

Nope, I heard about it and some of the St. Louis fans are apoplectic with anger. Rightly so. I would be too.:mad:

Just like LA was back when the Rams moved to St Louis back in 1994?

It's all about the NFL getting new stadiums. If you won't build a new stadium, they will move the team to somewhere that will. LA wouldn't build a new stadium back in the 90s, so they moved the Rams to St Louis. St Louis won't build a new stadium, so they move the team back to LA where another spectacle will be built just like Jerrydome.

Oh, and the LA stadium is going to house the NFL Network too. Interesting?

They also plan on it being a CFP location, Final Four location, concerts, etc. They're putting a roof on it, so they can do everything.
 

phillinois

New member
Mar 10, 2003
39,047
7,368
0
Just like LA was back when the Rams moved to St Louis back in 1994?

It's all about the NFL getting new stadiums. If you won't build a new stadium, they will move the team to somewhere that will. LA wouldn't build a new stadium back in the 90s, so they moved the Rams to St Louis. St Louis won't build a new stadium, so they move the team back to LA where another spectacle will be built just like Jerrydome.

Oh, and the LA stadium is going to house the NFL Network too. Interesting?

They also plan on it being a CFP location, Final Four location, concerts, etc. They're putting a roof on it, so they can do everything.

Oh that's right, you are, or were working there, Malibu as I recall?

That all purpose venue sounds nice.
While I'm at it, any city or metro that has 2 million or more population should be able to support a pro sports team.

Of course the Thunder in OKC is an anomaly. Those peeps luv them some pro basketball. Wow!
 

Raysor

Well-known member
Mar 29, 2002
633
7,442
93
Just like LA was back when the Rams moved to St Louis back in 1994?

It's all about the NFL getting new stadiums. If you won't build a new stadium, they will move the team to somewhere that will. LA wouldn't build a new stadium back in the 90s, so they moved the Rams to St Louis. St Louis won't build a new stadium, so they move the team back to LA where another spectacle will be built just like Jerrydome.

Oh, and the LA stadium is going to house the NFL Network too. Interesting?

They also plan on it being a CFP location, Final Four location, concerts, etc. They're putting a roof on it, so they can do everything.

That is like the definition of a monopolistic practice. Today is the 49th anniversary of the Packers vs the Chiefs in The First Super Bowl. A new competitive league could never happen when the city builds a stadium with tax payer dollars, only to have the NFL team own it in ten years or less.
 

John Otterstedt

New member
Jul 10, 2001
517,936
8,960
0
That is like the definition of a monopolistic practice. Today is the 49th anniversary of the Packers vs the Chiefs in The First Super Bowl. A new competitive league could never happen when the city builds a stadium with tax payer dollars, only to have the NFL team own it in ten years or less.

This is the unfortunate truth.
 

a. climacus

Active member
Oct 30, 2001
1,861
152
63
I'm a big Raiders fan. I so t know what I would do if they were in texas. Conflict of interest for me.
 

ETU

New member
Feb 5, 2003
58,648
4,720
0
Red has indicated that He would be willing to invest in the team and there are several sites in San Antonio for a new stadium. McCombs loves sports more than even the car business and he is a billionaire. If the deal is doable he would love to own another sports franchise especially in his home town. He would still be the owner of the Vikings if the league had allowed him to move the team to San Antonio.
 

ETU

New member
Feb 5, 2003
58,648
4,720
0
I didn't realize he had the Vikings. Neat tidbit of info.

McCombs sold them several years ago but has also owned the NBA Spurs and Nuggets in the past. He recently invested approximately $250m of the $450m Formula 1 race track in Austin. The guy watches every sporting event he has time to see. He even watches curling. Really.
 

a. climacus

Active member
Oct 30, 2001
1,861
152
63
It was always was mind boggling that it was in the Olympics but baseball/softball weren't.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ETU