The Good, The Bad, and The Beautiful

TheC

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
19,308
1,394
62
The Good
- A win is a win is a win, and in the end, the final numbers looked decent, even though the game was much tighter than the score suggests. But, we hung 34 points and nearly 500 yards of offense, which is something we don't do very often in the post-Randy Walker era.
- The three-headed RB attack is intriguing. While it will limit individual accolades for our backs, the depth will be very important during a rough BIG schedule, and all three showed they are capable of making plays.
- Chiles will be in all three categories. The good is that he clearly has natural talent, with a strong arm, good elusiveness and an ability to make plays down the field.
- Offensive success in the redzone was exciting to see. Not sure if that was coaching or the threat of Chiles, but we struggled mightily with that last year and the backs and receivers are the same.
- On the flipside, while the defense bent, it rarely broke in the redzone.
- The DBs were mostly solid in coverage against solid, but not spectacular, wide receivers
- We were turnover free
- Robert Fitzgerald can tackle. And when he tackles, you know you've been tackled. He is fun to watch!

The Bad
- The line play on both sides was not inspiring, and this coming against an FCS opponent (I know, I know... they are one of the good FCS teams, but still.....). Chiles had a lot of pressure on his dropbacks, whereas we seemed to not get much pressure on their QB. Our four-man rush was not generating pressure.
- Chiles concerns me. He dropped back a lot and held onto the ball way too long. That is going to cause a lot of trouble once the competition gets better. I can't tell for sure on TV, but I worry he is one of those QBs that doesn't release the ball until he sees his receiver open. QBs can't do that at this level.
- A lot of sloppy penalties that are uncharacteristic for us. That is fixable at least.
- The Carsello injury was scary and would really be costly if he is out for an extended period. At least they reported it may not be as bad as they treated it on the field.
- All in favor of going for it on every fourth down no matter where we are on the field, say aye!

The Beautiful
- A couple explosive offensive plays that began and ended the night brings a level of potential fun to this team we have sorely lacked recently and the Cats are 1-0!!
 

Figrating II

Redshirt
Jul 22, 2025
22
26
13
The NU O is clearly a level better than it's been in many years. Enormous amount of sputtering, but looks like there's an upside to them, too
IMHO, Sawchuck is the best of the 3 RBs and deserves to start, but really good to have 3 strong RBs. We always knew Himon was fast, but it was good to SEE he is fast. He gets a step on the D and it'll take somebody special to catch him. Should get a few screens every game. OL keeps leaking, maybe there will be a lot of screens this season.

NU D still showing Coach Hank's approach of bend-don't-break. The The NU pass rush is a huge weakness. SDSU QB has a strong, accurate arm - 285 yds passing!!!. A couple more routine catches by his receivers and maybe SDSU wins. Was hoping this unit was stronger.

One more game on the playground before NU plays in a real stadium like everybody else, but in a nicer stadium than anybody else. In past games, the lakefront campus has gotten good TV coverage. not so much yesterday.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Purple Pete

Deeringfish

All-Conference
Jun 23, 2008
21,680
1,646
63
The NU O is clearly a level better than it's been in many years. Enormous amount of sputtering, but looks like there's an upside to them, too
IMHO, Sawchuck is the best of the 3 RBs and deserves to start, but really good to have 3 strong RBs. We always knew Himon was fast, but it was good to SEE he is fast. He gets a step on the D and it'll take somebody special to catch him. Should get a few screens every game. OL keeps leaking, maybe there will be a lot of screens this season.

NU D still showing Coach Hank's approach of bend-don't-break. The The NU pass rush is a huge weakness. SDSU QB has a strong, accurate arm - 285 yds passing!!!. A couple more routine catches by his receivers and maybe SDSU wins. Was hoping this unit was stronger.

One more game on the playground before NU plays in a real stadium like everybody else, but in a nicer stadium than anybody else. In past games, the lakefront campus has gotten good TV coverage. not so much yesterday.
Lake front stadium doesn't show well at night and no longer is the stadium novelty at NU.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Figrating II

JustGary

Junior
Oct 7, 2025
175
244
43
Credit should go to our secondary. Damn they looked good and considering SDSU QB had all day to throw, having 11 PBU and less than half the passes were caught. Some say their receivers dropped a lot but I say our coverage force most of those incompletions. I think this may be one of the best secondaries we ever had.

I agree the line play needs to be better, but we were missing our best linemen on both sides of the ball. Considering the lines didn’t look that great in last year’s opener with Tulane, I think they can get a lot better. But as I said, SDSU QB had all day to throw and, frankly Chiles did not. But I think play will get better.

The only time the punter kicked a ball over 40 yards was when we were 36 yard out and we needed a short kick. His technique looked flawed as he throw-drops it then aims his foot to where he thinks it should be. The wind moved the ball or twisted it just enough to cause him to shank 4 of 5 punts. His nerves didn’t helped. In the new stadium, it will not move much but he needs to have better concentration on striking the ball like he did in high school. I assume they will work hard with him the next two weeks.

Chiles has shown all our opponents that he can throw it deep, he is elusive, and he can run. He did get indecisive after the first series but took responsibility for that and then led scoring drives in his last four possessions. We looked fast. Chip Kelly used misdirection and pre-snap movement effectively only because Chiles made it look smooth. We made big plays and our play-action was amazing. We are not predictable. Chip Kelly is going to make us a threat in every game we play. I think only rhythm and inconsistency will stop the offense. I’m more concern with giving 430+ yards to a FCS team. They are great (they put up 70 points a week earlier), but they are still a FCS team.

Biggest take away is I thought the game was a confidence builder. The offense was lively and fun for the players. The defense kept SDSU out of the end zone on 6 of 7 trips in the red zone. Plenty to work on but I think the players will be very motivated. Two weeks to get ready for Colorado and Braun made it sound like they will be working hard both weeks while understanding the team will be playing 11 straight games.

I’m nervous but excited. Plenty of our opponents (minus Rutgers) looked good this week.
 

techtim72

Senior
May 10, 2010
7,520
886
113
Relative to the incompletions a lot of them were caused by the fact that QB throws a hard ball. I know the saying is a receiver should catch anything within his grasp but just saying. Also I think the receivers were frequently flinching anticipating contact. That's credit to NU's secondary. Even with these criticisms I thought their receivers looked talented. Big and physical and they found holes in the defense with regularity. Many have criticized their receivers here but I think they will be a handful going forward.

I don't have the stats handy but I believe that the SDSU QB completed about 50% of 48 throws or so. Check me. That is an awful lot of throws and in today's world a so-so completion percentage. SDSU ran an exceptional number of plays (95 plus?) so NU's defense was on the field a lot. Further evidence of how well they did looking at the game's totality.
 

Zazzy

Junior
Aug 21, 2009
378
248
43
They are “just” a FCS team. Braun realizes this is a misconception. Kind of reminds me when the Super Bowl started and everyone said the AFC had no chance. Joe Bamath disagreed. SDSU and their potential NFL quarterback were for real (why the Vegas odds were 13 points). They would beat many Div 1 teams. Could we be better? Have an occasional real punt? Have no more than 4 penalties? Have a better pass rush? For sure.

Will be interesting to see how we do against Colorado. Hoping we have the four linemen back ( perhaps not ‘Sello but at least the other three). Thats 4/9 starters.
 

katatonic2

Sophomore
Dec 1, 2025
204
153
43
This FCS team likely has the talent in its starters (as well as in coaching) to be a fairly competitive P4 team; problem is depth which shouldn't be an issue this early in the season (in 2022, played Iowa tough, losing 7-3).

A lot of pre-season predictions for the Cats had SDSU as a win and MSU as a loss, but had more concern about the Jackrabbits.

This was the 2nd game for SDSU so they got to get the rust out of their system and they probably had this game circled all off season.

In contrast, first game for the Cats who are still getting used to new coaches/scheme/QB on the offensive side of the ball.

Plus, as a program, SDSU is known for their physical play in the trenches.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Purple Pete

Fanaticat98

Senior
May 29, 2001
9,171
787
113
SDSU was a quality opponent. By Sagarin preseason rankings they were 66, one slot behind Oregon’s opponent Boise State, who they barely beat. Most of the other B1G week 1 opponents were ranked well below SDSU.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Purple Pete

Purple Pile Driver

All-Conference
May 14, 2014
28,772
3,879
113
I must be watching a different game. I don’t see a NFL QB and at least half the QB’s in the B1G are better.

I think SDSU is a great FCS school. A real good chance to win the Natty. However 66 in the Sagarin Sue’s seems high . There are 67 P4 teams, all but 5 are ranked higher. I’ll take the top 3 teams in pretty much every G5 conference too. The only team ranked lower on our schedule is Ball State.
 

Fanaticat98

Senior
May 29, 2001
9,171
787
113
I must be watching a different game. I don’t see a NFL QB and at least half the QB’s in the B1G are better.

I think SDSU is a great FCS school. A real good chance to win the Natty. However 66 in the Sagarin Sue’s seems high . There are 67 P4 teams, all but 5 are ranked higher. I’ll take the top 3 teams in pretty much every G5 conference too. The only team ranked lower on our schedule is Ball State.
I could see it, his decisions seemed good and his throws were fast and tight and pretty much on target, lot of back shoulder throws etc. and many were incomplete either due to the receivers just not being athletic enough or our DBs doing a really awesome job breaking up a lot of passes at the last moment.
 
Wildcat Report

Latest

  1. 01 Wildcat Report Fearless Forecast: Colorado vs. Northwestern
  2. 02 Wildcat Report Northwestern extends head coach David Braun
  3. 03 Wildcat Report Behind Enemy Lines: Colorado
  4. 04 Wildcat Report Box or sideline? NU coaches detail philosophy as they send off Martin Stadium
  5. 05 Sports Predictions Colorado vs. Northwestern Polymarket odds: Opening point spread revealed, how to watch