"The lawsuit alleges revered coaches, staff and administrators were not only aware of the reported abuse, it was a requirement to play hockey at Michigan."
Whoa! Perhaps we should wait a second.When is the vote scheduled to throw scUM out of the Big Ten?
"The lawsuit alleges revered coaches, staff and administrators were not only aware of the reported abuse, it was a requirement to play hockey at Michigan."
It's because "the general public" doesn't care about 22-18 year old guys hazing each other vs an old man violating young boys.I'm guessing ESPN won't be having 24/7 coverage of this. There isn't a nationally known coach they can try to pin it all on.
"The lawsuit alleges revered coaches, staff and administrators were not only aware of the reported abuse, it was a requirement to play hockey at Michigan."
You know I was referring to Joe, right?? The guy ESPN was talking about more than they were talking about Sandusky. Right??It's because "the general public" doesn't care about 22-18 year old guys hazing each other vs an old man violating young boys.
You get one is far worse, right?
Right because Joe unknowingly employed a pedophileYou know I was referring to Joe, right?? The guy ESPN was talking about more than they were talking about Sandusky. Right??
First, point out where I said the situations were similar. Second, it was sexual abuse which was allegedly known about and openly condoned by UM staff. That wasn't the case at PSU. Institutionally condoned sexual abuse. You get that's a problem, right??Right because Joe unknowingly employed a pedophile
It's completely a different situation--again, you get that, right?
You can be angry about how ESPN handled it (that's just) without trying to pretend these situations are remotely similar.
Why did you bring it up if you're not comparing it?First, point out where I said the situations were similar. Second, it was sexual abuse which was allegedly known about and openly condoned by UM staff. That wasn't the case at PSU. Institutionally condoned sexual abuse. You get that's a problem, right??
And spare me that "it was hazing" BS. It's still sexual abuse, right?
No man, it's just your flawed way of reading what I posted. I didn't write what you thought I should have written so it's "there's no comparison!!" I apologize for triggering you and I feel bad for engaging. Have a good night.Why did you bring it up if you're not comparing it?
Did you read the suit? It states "hazing" repeatedly. Over and over and over again
You're saying Paterno didn't know? He did--he handled it correctly but he knew--as did other leaders
You're so angry about how ESPN handled Sandusky (primarily due to the incompetence of the Penn State leaders) that your first thought was being petty.
Giving you one more opportunity to realize how far off base you were...
You want to compare an adult male raping minor children to hazing acts that crossed a line between 18-22 year olds?
You also think the general public would care enough for ESPN to do so?
Just giving you the change to rethink your flawed stance here
Wasn't triggered at all. You said "I'm guessing ESPN won't be having 24/7 coverage of this. There isn't a nationally known coach they can try to pin it all on." which is an emotional response to what happened to Joe instead of the topic at hand.No man, it's just your flawed way of reading what I posted. I didn't write what you thought I should have written so it's "there's no comparison!!" I apologize for triggering you and I feel bad for engaging. Have a good night.
Yes, UM is strong academically. The athletic dept appears to be a never ending cluster F.Is there any part of that university that isn't dirty?
Michigan responds: "The former studebt athletes describe behavior at the hands of fellow teammates. ... The university denies that it is any way liable or responsible for the claims alleged."
They said in the statement that they had a policy against hazing. That's good enough for me!Imagine that a university actually pushing back on accusations... getting out in front of things.... crisis management....
Not just a policy, but they were one of the first to be anti-hazing. Very Michigan of them to try to turn this into another example of how great they are.They said in the statement that they had a policy against hazing. That's good enough for me!
USA Today
They said in the statement that they had a policy against hazing. That's good enough for me!
1.2 Don't check if policy is followed.Policy
1.1 Don’t haze.
"The lawsuit alleges revered coaches, staff and administrators were not only aware of the reported abuse, it was a requirement to play hockey at Michigan."
Well I did not read the lawsuit but your "slightly beyond normal hazing description is a long way from "akin to torture.", so i'll hold off until we hear more.It's because "the general public" doesn't care about 22-18 year old guys hazing each other vs an old man violating young boys.
You get one is far worse, right?
What are the totality of the numerous sexual improprieties against Michigan folks by now.Right because Joe unknowingly employed a pedophile
It's completely a different situation--again, you get that, right?
You can be angry about how ESPN handled it (that's just) without trying to pretend these situations are remotely similar.
Is slapping towels a lot like hazing.Why did you bring it up if you're not comparing it?
Did you read the suit? It states "hazing" repeatedly. Over and over and over again
You're saying Paterno didn't know? He did--he handled it correctly but he knew--as did other leaders
You're so angry about how ESPN handled Sandusky (primarily due to the incompetence of the Penn State leaders) that your first thought was being petty.
Giving you one more opportunity to realize how far off base you were...
You want to compare an adult male raping minor children to hazing acts that crossed a line between 18-22 year olds?
You also think the general public would care enough for ESPN to do so?
Just giving you the change to rethink your flawed stance here
Not to mention having objects literally forced into their a$$holes. Does that legally qualify as anal rape?Well I did not read the lawsuit but your "slightly beyond normal hazing description is a long way from "akin to torture.", so i'll hold off until we hear more.
I'll play Lando.Wasn't triggered at all. You said "I'm guessing ESPN won't be having 24/7 coverage of this. There isn't a nationally known coach they can try to pin it all on." which is an emotional response to what happened to Joe instead of the topic at hand.
BWI Football
‘This is why you come to Penn State’: Matt Campbell radio notebook
BWI Football
How Penn State's Offense Adjusts if Koby Howard Can't Play vs. Wisconsin
BWI Recruiting
Top 10 PA prospect among notable additions to Penn State-Wisconsin recruiting list
BWI Football
Matt Campbell notebook: What Penn State has learned - and what comes next
BWI Football
Intel: Who can step up for Penn State if Koby Howard is unable to play against Wisconsin?