College basketball's NIL arms race, from $5M to $25M+: Breaking down roster values, spending tiers for 2026-27
CBS Sports contacted more than 100 sources to discover how much each power-conference hoops program invested this season
How does that lead to an impressive resume? Assuming those teams are likely to be bad teams, a win against a bunch of cupcakes (even if they’re P4 cupcakes) doesn’t mean anything in the NET ranking system.I'm impressed and even a bit amazed that, per the article, Painter has never brought in a transfer that wasn't also a graduate. That's very cool and the model I think Collins wants to use.
Also, it looks like one of the ways to a more impressive resume is to schedule a bunch of the P4 teams for the under $5 million category.
A season where your OOC games are all victories over P4 teams and you have a winning record in the B1G conference (against the bottom half, sure, but still) will take you dancing. The $5 million and down category, as I read the article, still includes top 100 teams. They don't have to be cupcakes, they're just operating at a financial disadvantage. I haven't looked at real numbers across the P4, and the staff doesn't have the scheduling flexibility to intentionally create my snarky plan, but I suspect you could theoretically build schedules that target financially strapped P4 programs made up of teams ranked better than 150. I believe that would be an impressive resume for many teams not named Duke, Kentucky, NC, etc.How does that lead to an impressive resume? Assuming those teams are likely to be bad teams, a win against a bunch of cupcakes (even if they’re P4 cupcakes) doesn’t mean anything in the NET ranking system.
Problem is, I’m not sure you’d get many Q1 wins with that plan. And that will ultimately keep you out of the dance.A season where your OOC games are all victories over P4 teams and you have a winning record in the B1G conference (against the bottom half, sure, but still) will take you dancing. The $5 million and down category, as I read the article, still includes top 100 teams. They don't have to be cupcakes, they're just operating at a financial disadvantage. I haven't looked at real numbers across the P4, and the staff doesn't have the scheduling flexibility to intentionally create my snarky plan, but I suspect you could theoretically build schedules that target financially strapped P4 programs made up of teams ranked better than 150. I believe that would be an impressive resume for many teams not named Duke, Kentucky, NC, etc.
I mean, based on the article, the Cats may not be very far above that $5 line. Coaching and recruiting the right players for your style rather than just the most expensive players available will still matter. I'm sure we'll see some big spenders go bust or flame out early.
The problem with hating Collins is, it’s unproductive. Who’s going to replace him? If a coach doesn’t have a competitive budget, it’s hard to expect a competitive team.It’s going to be a long year for the Cats. The CCC haters gonna have a field day.
I don’t think it’s a big IF on whether there’s currently a money issue for basketballIf, and it's a big IF, the issue is money, Collins has his hands tied. Time will tell.
This is the general conflict, right? Coach needs enough money every year to retain his own guys AND attract competitive recruits.I don’t think the Cats need to be in one of the top tiers to be competitive, but they need to be able to retain their guys.
I don’t know for sure, but I suspect that there is a steep drop-off as far as valuation for incoming recruits after the top-tier guys who are sure to make an impact right away. Otherwise you wouldn’t see 4 star guys signing with A-10 schools like VCU.This is the general conflict, right? Coach needs enough money every year to retain his own guys AND attract competitive recruits.
What do you mean time will tell? We've known this since we couldn't back up the Brinks truck to keep Boo AND ChaseIf, and it's a big IF, the issue is money, Collins has his hands tied. Time will tell.
Huh, my recollection is that we kept both of them.What do you mean time will tell? We've known this since we couldn't back up the Brinks truck to keep Boo AND Chase
Yeah I mean if you look at HS recruiting now, it’s nothing like it was. Top tier schools will take a couple high ranked studs from HS and then the rest is proven transfers who have already shown they can do it in college.I don’t know for sure, but I suspect that there is a steep drop-off as far as valuation for incoming recruits after the top-tier guys who are sure to make an impact right away. Otherwise you wouldn’t see 4 star guys signing with A-10 schools like VCU.
I think recruits in that range aren’t even being looked at by the top schools out of high school since they know they can attract guys in the portal once they prove themselves worthy of playing time. The top schools probably don’t feel like they have the luxury to spare developmental minutes for someone like Ghai but will gladly pluck him away once he shows he is a solid player. There are some exceptions (UNC taking a flyer on Bennerman) but usually I think the top teams prefer a guy who can help now.
We don't know. Supposedly they offered Singleton something like $1 mill and others offered a bit more but thought I heard he was still inclined to stay until all the people talking into ear convinced him otherwiseThis is the general conflict, right? Coach needs enough money every year to retain his own guys AND attract competitive recruits.
That doesn't have to be in the first few tiers of the article, but it looks like it has to be more than he had to spend this off season or he'd have retained Singleton.
Time will tell if they open the wallets to a more realistic level in order to compete, They did it in FB as we supposedly spent $23 mill for this year, No will they do it for BB as well?What do you mean time will tell? We've known this since we couldn't back up the Brinks truck to keep Boo AND Chase
Iowa State spends in the 10-12 million dollar range and NU is in the 7-10 million dollar range? If that’s true then….Time will tell if they open the wallets to a more realistic level in order to compete, They did it in FB as we supposedly spent $23 mill for this year, No will they do it for BB as well?
I had not seen that number for usIowa State spends in the 10-12 million dollar range and NU is in the 7-10 million dollar range? If that’s true then….
1). ISU does a great job with talent evaluation as they are so much better than NU without spending a ton more.
2). If NU is really spending 7-10 million on this roster, that would mean each player is making 500k-700k on average. Obviously some make more than others. I know that’s peanuts for many teams these days but who on this roster is worth that much?
WestIowa State spends in the 10-12 million dollar range and NU is in the 7-10 million dollar range? If that’s true then….
1). ISU does a great job with talent evaluation as they are so much better than NU without spending a ton more.
2). If NU is really spending 7-10 million on this roster, that would mean each player is making 500k-700k on average. Obviously some make more than others. I know that’s peanuts for many teams these days but who on this roster is worth that much?
After yesterday, it’s hard to say that the people in his ear were wrong.We don't know. Supposedly they offered Singleton something like $1 mill and others offered a bit more but thought I heard he was still inclined to stay until all the people talking into ear convinced him otherwise
Well NU would look far different if he was still hereAfter yesterday, it’s hard to say that the people in his ear were wrong.
Per the article, he was probably marketable at the $2-3 million range, and that doesn't count the offering team's tourney prospects. Offers should consider the ear whispering crowd's influence in this new world. Teams without (strong) (recent) history of doing well in the tournament and/or putting players in the NBA are going to have to pay a lot more for similar talent when competing against teams with.We don't know. Supposedly they offered Singleton something like $1 mill and others offered a bit more but thought I heard he was still inclined to stay until all the people talking into ear convinced him otherwise
Also this was the Carmody strategy. Almost worked.Problem is, I’m not sure you’d get many Q1 wins with that plan. And that will ultimately keep you out of the dance.
But 1) it didnt. 2) This is a totally different era of college basketball down to how the NET ratings and Q1 wins dictate everything.Also this was the Carmody strategy. Almost worked.
1) Check the tape 2) YesBut 1) it didnt. 2) This is a totally different era of college basketball down to how the NET ratings and Q1 wins dictate everything.
Wildcat Report
Thamel: Chiles out for Iowa game
Wildcat Report
Fearless Forecast: No. 19 Iowa vs. Northwestern
Wildcat Report
Behind Enemy Lines: No. 19 Iowa
Wildcat Report
Northwestern at Oregon PFF Grades Analysis
College Football Playoff
College Football Playoff: The 31 teams that still have a chance to make the field