Why do you want Rutgers to win vs Nebby (except for the fact we always like to see Nebby lose) when we dont play Buttgers but we do play Nebby and want them to at least have a winning record or their best record possible on the last weekend?We want as winners this week to improve our profile for CFP:
Illinois
Northwestern
Wisconsin
RUTGERS (LOL)
Indiana
Michigan
Washington
Minnesota
IOWA
View attachment 1526136
Just because I HATE Nebraska.Why do you want Rutgers to win vs Nebby (except for the fact we always like to see Nebby lose) when we dont play Buttgers but we do play Nebby and want them to at least have a winning record or their best record possible on the last weekend?
Agree.Depends on your motivations.
I assume that wanting Rutgers to win is an Iowa fan thing that you put in jest, because Iowa has a SOS problem, and we don't want Neb to tank like that from that standpoint.
Also, I want Iowa in the BTCG, and USC beating IN is a way to that means. Otherwise they'll need UCLA to lose twice (play vs. IL, @ MI, vs. USC), because I don't think IN is losing any other game (@ WA, vs. PU).
If UCLA actually loses to IL on Fri night, then I'd pull for Indiana.
They won't put just two Big Ten teams in CFP. It will be at least 3.Agree.
Still want a chance to get to last BIG title game and win league.
Not sure of tie- break between USC and Iowa but I like our chances better if IU get a 2nd loss in league..
To me conference title takes precedence over SOS/ playoff implication.
As you said if Illinois pull off the upset over UCLA, fine, then we have two paths to BIG title game.
I do think our best shot at making playoffs is auto bid...skeptical that the 7 of 12 on committee from SEC country will put Iowa in over SEC team.
Midwest reps,dantonio and neb AD not going to advocate for program they dislike.
Isn't that enough?Why do you want Rutgers to win vs Nebby (except for the fact we always like to see Nebby lose)
UCLA isn't dropping 2 gamesGood lord these tie breaking scenarios are a disaster.
1.) If UCLA drops two, they would be likely tied with Iowa even in head to head of common opponents.
2.) OSU needs to drop one more game, and that would most likely mean this wekeend against NW.
3.) Oregon, tied with Iowa if they win out
4.) USC, beats Indiana hold the tie breaker over iowa with OSU win
5.) Indiana, hold tie breaker over iowa with win against Minnesota
Agreed. Want USC and Oregon to lose another ASAP to get them off our tail.I'm at the point where I want UCLA and Indiana to win out and USC to lose at least one more. That way, we aren't jumbled with them in the evaluation. I don't think there'll be less than 3, so I want it to be fairly cut and dry that we are that 3rd team.
I do legit worry about Oregon. If Oklahoma State can pull off the upset this weekend over TT, they will jump into the rankings again. That Illinois loss should have knocked them out, but the CFP pollsters have shown that strength of schedule is huge this year.I'm at the point where I want UCLA and Indiana to win out and USC and Oregon to lose at least one more. That way, we aren't jumbled with them in the evaluation. I don't think there'll be less than 3, so I want it to be fairly cut and dry that we are that 3rd team.
I don't think that any team in the Big10 has anything to do with whether Iowa gets in or not. There is no rule stating the Big10 has to get "X" number of teams in. I think Iowa controls their own destiny. Iowa just needs to finish the season with 3 dominant wins over 3 average and below average teams. Do that and I think they have an excellent chance to make the field. Fail to do that and they're out.We need to be the clear #3 Big Ten team sitting at 10-2. Then we are in.
I agree with IU win out and knock usc out. Hope Oregon losses again too. But ucla I’m curious if they lost 2 of last 3 would they be ahead of Iowa? Think IU would be if they dropped one more and usc would jump us with wins over IU and ucla.I'm at the point where I want UCLA and Indiana to win out and USC and Oregon to lose at least one more. That way, we aren't jumbled with them in the evaluation. I don't think there'll be less than 3, so I want it to be fairly cut and dry that we are that 3rd team.
Exactly right!I'm at the point where I want UCLA and Indiana to win out and USC and Oregon to lose at least one more. That way, we aren't jumbled with them in the evaluation. I don't think there'll be less than 3, so I want it to be fairly cut and dry that we are that 3rd team.
Meh anything is possible, and you might be right, but it isn't as concrete as you say.UCLA isn't dropping 2 games
OSU is losing one more.
Oregon and Iowa wil be tied at 7-2, but it has no bearing on the BTCG.
USC isn't beating Indiana.
You don't have to worry about tie breakers. It will be UCLA and Indiana.
You're right. Anything can happen, but I think UCLA is a lock, and I don't see Indiana losing to USC or Purdue at home or Washington on the road. The rest is irrelevant.Meh anything is possible, and you might be right, but it isn't as concrete as you say.
Illinois is more than capable of winning that game, Houser is one heck of a QB. UCLA is 3rd in turnover margin, and Illinois does not turn the ball over.
OSU is a 14.5 point favorite this weekend. If Chiles doesn't play, I see OSU winning this game. I have zero confidence in Michigan or Nebraska getting that job done
Indiana should have lost to Minnesota last weekend, they are anything but unbeatable
Hawkeye Report Football
Hawkeyes in the NFL: Week Nine Top Performers
Hawkeye Report Basketball
Tip Time Preview: Virginia Tech vs. Iowa
Hawkeye Report Football
Iowa Football Opponent Preview: Purdue Boilermakers
Hawkeye Report Olympics
2027 Iowa Baseball Schedule Announced
Hawkeye Report Basketball
Top takeaways from the Hawkeyes loss to Connecticut