Is that website an AOL chat room?
Judicial Watch and Heritage Foundation are attempting to fill in for the US DoJ on investigating these apparent oversights.Is that website an AOL chat room?
Awesome. Keep me regularly updated. Thanks in advanceJudicial Watch and Heritage Foundation are attempting to fill in for the US DoJ on investigating these apparent oversights.
Investigating? [roll]Judicial Watch and Heritage Foundation are attempting to fill in for the US DoJ on investigating these apparent oversights.
Something must have tickled you. Do you want to share. The organizations are filing FOI and getting court dates for hearing where they have standing.Investigating? [roll]
Could you not find it on AOL chatroom?Awesome. Keep me regularly updated. Thanks in advance
No sir. I don't have access to 1997.Could you not find it on AOL chatroom?
If you really have interest in following, send me your address and I will get you on mailing list for Heritage and Judicial. They are very enlightening and can supplement your MSNBC & CNN.No sir. I don't have access to 1997.
OK, I'll break it down for you. What's on that site is not "investigating," it's rehashing clickbait links from a variety of mostly right-wing websites and blogs, some of it going back to when Bill was running for president 24 years ago. So yes, that stuff tickles the hell out of me. But I was disappointed not to see a listing of the people that the Clintons supposedly have had killed over the years -- not even a reference to Vince Foster unless I missed it.Something must have tickled you. Do you want to share. The organizations are filing FOI and getting court dates for hearing where they have standing.
Do you have another, more descriptive, word for their work?
Are you conflating the OP akdart reference with what I offered as two organizations that I do believe are doing investigations? I am not familiar with the former, but I do subsribe to the latter. If I am paying into a fraud, would be interested in your conclusion.OK, I'll break it down for you. What's on that site is not "investigating," it's rehashing clickbait links from a variety of mostly right-wing websites and blogs, some of it going back to when Bill was running for president 24 years ago. So yes, that stuff tickles the hell out of me. But I was disappointed not to see a listing of the people that the Clintons supposedly have had killed over the years -- not even a reference to Vince Foster unless I missed it.
Yes, because one means about as much as the other. Did I miss the DOJ announcement that their investigations are closed with no further action?Are you conflating the OP akdart reference with what I offered as two organizations that I do believe are doing investigations? I am not familiar with the former, but I do subsribe to the latter. If I am paying into a fraud, would be interested in your conclusion.
I have seen no release by DoJ which is normal. But this DoJ has been less than forthcoming. Therefore, I think it is very appropriate for people outside government to promote action where The Dept is ignoring obvious infractions. Do you think that is an improper action by the public sector?Yes, because one means about as much as the other. Did I miss the DOJ announcement that their investigations are closed with no further action?