A good read.

mneilmont

New member
Jan 23, 2008
20,883
166
0
Investigating? [roll]
Something must have tickled you. Do you want to share. The organizations are filing FOI and getting court dates for hearing where they have standing.

Do you have another, more descriptive, word for their work?
 

mneilmont

New member
Jan 23, 2008
20,883
166
0
No sir. I don't have access to 1997.
If you really have interest in following, send me your address and I will get you on mailing list for Heritage and Judicial. They are very enlightening and can supplement your MSNBC & CNN.
 

Popeer

New member
Sep 8, 2003
21,466
81
0
Something must have tickled you. Do you want to share. The organizations are filing FOI and getting court dates for hearing where they have standing.

Do you have another, more descriptive, word for their work?
OK, I'll break it down for you. What's on that site is not "investigating," it's rehashing clickbait links from a variety of mostly right-wing websites and blogs, some of it going back to when Bill was running for president 24 years ago. So yes, that stuff tickles the hell out of me. But I was disappointed not to see a listing of the people that the Clintons supposedly have had killed over the years -- not even a reference to Vince Foster unless I missed it.
 

mneilmont

New member
Jan 23, 2008
20,883
166
0
OK, I'll break it down for you. What's on that site is not "investigating," it's rehashing clickbait links from a variety of mostly right-wing websites and blogs, some of it going back to when Bill was running for president 24 years ago. So yes, that stuff tickles the hell out of me. But I was disappointed not to see a listing of the people that the Clintons supposedly have had killed over the years -- not even a reference to Vince Foster unless I missed it.
Are you conflating the OP akdart reference with what I offered as two organizations that I do believe are doing investigations? I am not familiar with the former, but I do subsribe to the latter. If I am paying into a fraud, would be interested in your conclusion.
 

Popeer

New member
Sep 8, 2003
21,466
81
0
Are you conflating the OP akdart reference with what I offered as two organizations that I do believe are doing investigations? I am not familiar with the former, but I do subsribe to the latter. If I am paying into a fraud, would be interested in your conclusion.
Yes, because one means about as much as the other. Did I miss the DOJ announcement that their investigations are closed with no further action?
 

mneilmont

New member
Jan 23, 2008
20,883
166
0
Yes, because one means about as much as the other. Did I miss the DOJ announcement that their investigations are closed with no further action?
I have seen no release by DoJ which is normal. But this DoJ has been less than forthcoming. Therefore, I think it is very appropriate for people outside government to promote action where The Dept is ignoring obvious infractions. Do you think that is an improper action by the public sector?