Oh boy.
Happy New Year. I guess?
Going to get this out of the way early. I think Nate Oats, in all of his insightful snark, nailed us for what we are yesterday. A paper tiger.
Stat-padding team play against cupcakes, ball sticking no offense running vs. anyone with a pulse.
So taken as a whole, the stats are lying.
We are still sitting 18th in my model. But, and it’s a big but, just looking at the past 2 games we basically played like a team in the 60s.
Before posting the latest, one other correction. People have been asking me how Michigan compares to teams historically. I erroneously said that they were the best I’ve seen since starting this modeling in 2018.
Crazy enough, Auburn was actually a bit better last year at the exact point. How soon we forget.
All kinds of caveats to that. I made some adjustments based on recent data that de-emphasized blocked shots in the model. Auburn almost definitely got a bump from that last year.
But still, Auburn last year was at least on par with Michigan this year heading into conference play. Auburn cooled off some, but not that much. At the start of the tournament, Auburn/Duke/Florida were the obvious title picks with Houston and Alabama as possibilities.
TL/DR. Michigan great. Still hope for others (though maybe not us.)
Watch out for Purdue, who is streaking up the ratings.
The Latest:
1. Michigan 4.59
2. Gonzaga 3.68
3. Purdue 3.64
4. Arizona 3.57
5. Vanderbilt 3.52
6. Iowa St 3.36
7. Duke 3.21
8. UConn 3.08
9. Iowa 2.63
10. Tennessee 2.53
11. BYU 2.521
12. Alabama 2.520
13. Louisville 2.47
14. Michigan St 2.13
15. Houston 2.04
16. Arkansas 2.03
17. NC St 1.94
18. Kentucky 1.89
19. Indiana 1.88
20. Auburn 1.85
21. Utah St 1.81
22. Texas Tech 1.80
23. Illinois 1.792
24. SMU 1.7907
25. Virginia 1.7904
26. Kansas 1.73
27. St John’s 1.69
30. Florida 1.53
31. North Carolina 1.51
33. Georgia 1.45
Happy New Year. I guess?
Going to get this out of the way early. I think Nate Oats, in all of his insightful snark, nailed us for what we are yesterday. A paper tiger.
Stat-padding team play against cupcakes, ball sticking no offense running vs. anyone with a pulse.
So taken as a whole, the stats are lying.
We are still sitting 18th in my model. But, and it’s a big but, just looking at the past 2 games we basically played like a team in the 60s.
Before posting the latest, one other correction. People have been asking me how Michigan compares to teams historically. I erroneously said that they were the best I’ve seen since starting this modeling in 2018.
Crazy enough, Auburn was actually a bit better last year at the exact point. How soon we forget.
All kinds of caveats to that. I made some adjustments based on recent data that de-emphasized blocked shots in the model. Auburn almost definitely got a bump from that last year.
But still, Auburn last year was at least on par with Michigan this year heading into conference play. Auburn cooled off some, but not that much. At the start of the tournament, Auburn/Duke/Florida were the obvious title picks with Houston and Alabama as possibilities.
TL/DR. Michigan great. Still hope for others (though maybe not us.)
Watch out for Purdue, who is streaking up the ratings.
The Latest:
1. Michigan 4.59
2. Gonzaga 3.68
3. Purdue 3.64
4. Arizona 3.57
5. Vanderbilt 3.52
6. Iowa St 3.36
7. Duke 3.21
8. UConn 3.08
9. Iowa 2.63
10. Tennessee 2.53
11. BYU 2.521
12. Alabama 2.520
13. Louisville 2.47
14. Michigan St 2.13
15. Houston 2.04
16. Arkansas 2.03
17. NC St 1.94
18. Kentucky 1.89
19. Indiana 1.88
20. Auburn 1.85
21. Utah St 1.81
22. Texas Tech 1.80
23. Illinois 1.792
24. SMU 1.7907
25. Virginia 1.7904
26. Kansas 1.73
27. St John’s 1.69
30. Florida 1.53
31. North Carolina 1.51
33. Georgia 1.45