Haven’t had the heart to run any numbers this season until now. Seeing as we at least had a pulse last night, let’s take a look at how things stack up halfway through December.
Reminder - this score represents the expected number of tournament victories for each team, measured against tournament teams from recent history. So a 2 is roughly a Sweet 16 level team, and 6 would be a perfect score, championship lock.
1. Michigan 4.58
2. Gonzaga 4.34
3. Iowa St 3.77
4. Arizona 3.57
5. Duke 3.41
6. Vanderbilt 3.22
7. UConn 2.93
8. Purdue 2.86
9. Louisville 2.66
10. BYU 2.63
11. Alabama 2.58
12. Michigan St 2.41
13. Iowa 2.213
14. Indiana 2.209
15. Houston 2.16
16. Tennessee 2.14
17. Kentucky 2.08
18. NC St 2.06
19. Arkansas 2.02
20. St John’s 1.97
21. Georgia 1.87
22. Nebraska 1.82
23. Miami 1.77
24. St Louis 1.682
25. Auburn 1.679
26. Florida 1.66
28. Kansas 1.62
37. North Carolina 1.30
Usual caveat that this is really early and the modeling gets sharper throughout the season.
Also that this model predicts likelihood of tournament success. That correlates with best team, but can differ in some ways.
If you see anything truly bizarre, please point it out. Sometimes there are data issues early in the year as teams change.
Reminder - this score represents the expected number of tournament victories for each team, measured against tournament teams from recent history. So a 2 is roughly a Sweet 16 level team, and 6 would be a perfect score, championship lock.
1. Michigan 4.58
2. Gonzaga 4.34
3. Iowa St 3.77
4. Arizona 3.57
5. Duke 3.41
6. Vanderbilt 3.22
7. UConn 2.93
8. Purdue 2.86
9. Louisville 2.66
10. BYU 2.63
11. Alabama 2.58
12. Michigan St 2.41
13. Iowa 2.213
14. Indiana 2.209
15. Houston 2.16
16. Tennessee 2.14
17. Kentucky 2.08
18. NC St 2.06
19. Arkansas 2.02
20. St John’s 1.97
21. Georgia 1.87
22. Nebraska 1.82
23. Miami 1.77
24. St Louis 1.682
25. Auburn 1.679
26. Florida 1.66
28. Kansas 1.62
37. North Carolina 1.30
Usual caveat that this is really early and the modeling gets sharper throughout the season.
Also that this model predicts likelihood of tournament success. That correlates with best team, but can differ in some ways.
If you see anything truly bizarre, please point it out. Sometimes there are data issues early in the year as teams change.