Any chance at Ament?

Wunky

Heisman
Jan 16, 2021
4,250
17,620
78
it’s a bidding war with ament, whoever drops the highest bag gets him

Yeah… sorry, I’m out on that. I think if you are getting into bidding wars for high schoolers in this era, you’re grasping at straws.

Hubert and Scheyer are under a lot of pressure to win, just like Pope is. But I think Pope has looked at the landscape and decided to take a more Hurley-esque approach to recruiting, which I’m grateful for after suffering through the previous regime. I mean that approach didn’t even work for K toward the end. I’m kind of shocked so many coaches are still pinning their hopes on freshmen, tbh. It’s a losing proposition.
 

DaDirtyLeb69

Heisman
Jan 4, 2022
40,272
62,553
113
Yeah… sorry, I’m out on that. I think if you are getting into bidding wars for high schoolers in this era, you’re grasping at straws.

Hubert and Scheyer are under a lot of pressure to win, just like Pope is. But I think Pope has looked at the landscape and decided to take a more Hurley-esque approach to recruiting, which I’m grateful for after suffering through the previous regime. I mean that approach didn’t even work for K toward the end. I’m kind of shocked so many coaches are still pinning their hopes on freshmen, tbh. It’s a losing proposition.
I agree, there gets a certain price these players are asking where it’s makes more sense to look elsewhere. I want top players here but if they all want 2-3 million dollars you can’t build a roster that way.
 

EliteBlue

Heisman
Mar 27, 2009
16,751
20,269
0
We need to get out of the “have to have he shiny high school kid” mindset.

Sure, you go after any highschool kids that are projected lotto coming out of HS. And then you get 1-2 of the 30-50range that show the right mindset of wanting to be here for 2-4 years…..

But the majority of your key pieces should come from the portal. You’ll find an immediate contributor that is equal to, or better than, the not lotto highschool kid. Go get that highly productive soph/Jr from a bubble team….Oweh/Garrison types. Especially with your front court, I’d prefer the 20-22 year old that has developed in the weight room vs the 18 year old stick figure unless they are Davis/Noel aka guaranteed lotto. It’s easier to find highschool guards that are ready for college physicality but the learning curve is steeper w PF/C
 

tj4fun

All-Conference
Dec 22, 2013
810
1,260
93
Yeah… sorry, I’m out on that. I think if you are getting into bidding wars for high schoolers in this era, you’re grasping at straws.

Hubert and Scheyer are under a lot of pressure to win, just like Pope is. But I think Pope has looked at the landscape and decided to take a more Hurley-esque approach to recruiting, which I’m grateful for after suffering through the previous regime. I mean that approach didn’t even work for K toward the end. I’m kind of shocked so many coaches are still pinning their hopes on freshmen, tbh. It’s a losing proposition.
If you had to pick between Ament, and a top portal forward, which one would you want? I highly doubt that Ament or Wilson would be interested in sharing minutes with a top portal PF! They are looking to play 30-32 MPG. IMO the SEC will really give both of these serious trouble!
 
Sep 13, 2003
23,905
33,655
0
Yeah… sorry, I’m out on that. I think if you are getting into bidding wars for high schoolers in this era, you’re grasping at straws.

Hubert and Scheyer are under a lot of pressure to win, just like Pope is. But I think Pope has looked at the landscape and decided to take a more Hurley-esque approach to recruiting, which I’m grateful for after suffering through the previous regime. I mean that approach didn’t even work for K toward the end. I’m kind of shocked so many coaches are still pinning their hopes on freshmen, tbh. It’s a losing proposition.
Agreed.

I would just add that SKINNY PF's do NOT thrive in the ultra physical and athletic SEC. These kids know that and will be more likely to want to go to the ACC or the Big 12. Pope knows this also, which is why if the price is too high OR the kid is bent on getting a certain amount of minutes AND touches, he will look to the portal.
 

UKSanders_rivals37733

All-American
Jan 1, 2003
8,634
8,736
0
We need to get out of the “have to have he shiny high school kid” mindset.

Sure, you go after any highschool kids that are projected lotto coming out of HS. And then you get 1-2 of the 30-50range that show the right mindset of wanting to be here for 2-4 years…..

But the majority of your key pieces should come from the portal. You’ll find an immediate contributor that is equal to, or better than, the not lotto highschool kid. Go get that highly productive soph/Jr from a bubble team….Oweh/Garrison types. Especially with your front court, I’d prefer the 20-22 year old that has developed in the weight room vs the 18 year old stick figure unless they are Davis/Noel aka guaranteed lotto. It’s easier to find highschool guards that are ready for college physicality but the learning curve is steeper w PF/C

Honestly, with NIL now, a lot of these guys should be thinking 2-3 years in college b/c unless they are can't miss lotto guys with big guaranteed contracts, and they produce pretty well as a freshman, they will almost certainly have a chance to make more money in college than be a fringe NBA prospect.
 

chasingwildcat

All-American
Dec 23, 2024
3,285
6,715
113
Expect for Moreno, we may need to use portal to fill in all of our frontcourt spots as 26 class does not have many intriguing frontcourt recruits
 

Cat_Man_Blue

All-Conference
Jan 5, 2003
1,751
1,442
113
If you had to pick between Ament, and a top portal forward, which one would you want? I highly doubt that Ament or Wilson would be interested in sharing minutes with a top portal PF! They are looking to play 30-32 MPG. IMO the SEC will really give both of these serious trouble!
While I would prefer a top portal guy, I can make a case for Ament. The sooner Pope can sign a talent like Ament and make him a lotto pick the better for future recruiting. Once Pope does that, he checks the box of having developed a lotto pick. When that happens, the sky is the limit for Pope. Unlike Cal, Pope will know how to integrate players like Ament into a cohesive unit with veterans and chase banners.
 
Jul 26, 2003
21,180
11,162
0
Moreno and Ament would be two good young bigs that could have time to grow. We need two portal bigs at a minimun if we are serious of winning the championship. Garrison and at least two other bigs from the portal that can shoot, defend and rebound. Really those two need to be natural fours with great size so they can both play the four and five. Will need a portal three and a portal guard that is a combo guard so there is plenty of older and stronger players on the roster. Luckily Oweh is planning to come back.
 
Nov 3, 2007
30,777
6,859
0
My model says it looks like about a 11.7% chance he comes here, mostly due to the fact Pope isn’t willing to offer big money to some kid who isn’t as good as MANY portal players. Same with the Wilson thing. Not really into eliminating generational poverty and stuff at this point. That will take care of itself if the kids are good enough and work hard.
 

yoshukai

Heisman
Dec 21, 2002
28,434
39,529
102
Me either because Scheyer is just like K in that he only plays 6-7 guys significant minutes.
Duke has 2 SF's already signed for next season plus Evans if he returns and Boozer getting 30-35 minutes at PF. If Ament goes there and his family wants a ton of pt I just can't see all of them staying committed.
Those 2 signed forwards aren’t going to be playing ahead to Ament . Evans, Boozer, and Ament split the 80 minutes at the 3&4 spot. That’s plenty of playing time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: *Fox2Monk*

yoshukai

Heisman
Dec 21, 2002
28,434
39,529
102
We need to get out of the “have to have he shiny high school kid” mindset.

Sure, you go after any highschool kids that are projected lotto coming out of HS. And then you get 1-2 of the 30-50range that show the right mindset of wanting to be here for 2-4 years…..

But the majority of your key pieces should come from the portal. You’ll find an immediate contributor that is equal to, or better than, the not lotto highschool kid. Go get that highly productive soph/Jr from a bubble team….Oweh/Garrison types. Especially with your front court, I’d prefer the 20-22 year old that has developed in the weight room vs the 18 year old stick figure unless they are Davis/Noel aka guaranteed lotto. It’s easier to find highschool guards that are ready for college physicality but the learning curve is steeper w PF/C
Yep . I’ll say it again. There has been only ONE top 10 freshman on a national championship team since 2015 . Coming into this year Dan Hurley had signed exactly ONE top 30 guy since he’s been at UCONN .
 

RalphDaltonFan

Heisman
Apr 3, 2002
60,114
41,376
113
If you want to recruit him or anyone in that ranking area-you better understand they will want a lot of $$$. If you want to invest that time, then be prepared to close. Otherwise, don't waste your time and focus on guys who are happy with financial discussions and willing to come to Lexington. Who is the UK GM on Pope's Staff? The amount of $/resources are available to get these type of players too. It's not a lack of funding.
 
May 31, 2018
15,275
30,681
98
Those 2 signed forwards aren’t going to be playing ahead to Ament . Evans, Boozer, and Ament split the 80 minutes at the 3&4 spot. That’s plenty of playing time.
So what about Brown, Knueppel, Proctor and Evans who all play either the 3 or 4 spot? Will they transfer or play ahead of Ament?
 
  • Like
Reactions: *Fox2Monk*

bnewt

Heisman
May 29, 2001
8,853
11,022
113
If you want to recruit him or anyone in that ranking area-you better understand they will want a lot of $$$. If you want to invest that time, then be prepared to close. Otherwise, don't waste your time and focus on guys who are happy with financial discussions and willing to come to Lexington. Who is the UK GM on Pope's Staff? The amount of $/resources are available to get these type of players too. It's not a lack of funding.
You say it is not a lack of funding, but where is this $ coming from. Is there a money tree planted on the UK campus? If so, cut me off a sprig to plant.

Also, how are you going to have a "team" if you give someone twice as much $ as the other guys. That has to create jealousy.
 

yoshukai

Heisman
Dec 21, 2002
28,434
39,529
102
So what about Brown, Knueppel, Proctor and Evans who all play either the 3 or 4 spot? Will they transfer or play ahead of Ament?
Honestly I don’t know anything about Brown . I have seen Knueppel projected as a first round pick . I don’t believe we will be a player in this recruitment. I also think that Ament will have major problems defending the 3 or the 4 positions .
 

katwest

Heisman
Feb 16, 2003
39,509
13,197
113
Ament being seen as a Duke lean is funny, for years we had recruits saying if so and so is going to Kentucky, then I’m going somewhere else. I never hear anybody that’s going to Duke worry about who’s there or who’s going there, seems odd to me. Can’t but 5 people play at once yet they all line up like they are following the pied piper. Splinter is gone now, but I have a hunch he’s still heavily involved.
 

ukwildcatwildfan

All-Conference
Oct 17, 2008
1,358
2,215
18
We need to get out of the “have to have he shiny high school kid” mindset.

Sure, you go after any highschool kids that are projected lotto coming out of HS. And then you get 1-2 of the 30-50range that show the right mindset of wanting to be here for 2-4 years…..

But the majority of your key pieces should come from the portal. You’ll find an immediate contributor that is equal to, or better than, the not lotto highschool kid. Go get that highly productive soph/Jr from a bubble team….Oweh/Garrison types. Especially with your front court, I’d prefer the 20-22 year old that has developed in the weight room vs the 18 year old stick figure unless they are Davis/Noel aka guaranteed lotto. It’s easier to find highschool guards that are ready for college physicality but the learning curve is steeper w PF/C
Agreed. Unless you’re talking an AD/MKG type combo I just think any coach should be very hesitant rolling out starting lineups with multiple freshman. Even our outstanding Fox/Monk backcourt combined for just 25 pts and 3 assists when they got bounced by UNC in 2017. Bam wasnt any better.

I continue to believe the key to the portal is getting guys who have proved they can play in college, and still have multiple years of eligibility. Examples of multi-year transfers this season include Broome, Sears, and Dickinson. Otherwise it’s just a different version of the one and done model we all got tired of.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: *Fox2Monk*

*Fox2Monk*

Heisman
Jun 10, 2009
43,054
76,698
113
If you want to recruit him or anyone in that ranking area-you better understand they will want a lot of $$$. If you want to invest that time, then be prepared to close. Otherwise, don't waste your time and focus on guys who are happy with financial discussions and willing to come to Lexington. Who is the UK GM on Pope's Staff? The amount of $/resources are available to get these type of players too. It's not a lack of funding.
In your opinion is Ament good enough for that investment? I know we offered Wilson but he seems more physically ready for the SEC. I’m curious what you think because I believe we could snag 2 high ranked portal options for what Ament will want.
 

billoliver40

All-American
Dec 16, 2015
6,736
9,444
0
The 'lean' thing is on my opinion a way handlers go for more perks and more NIL dollars. Maybe the guys deserve it....but I really think they need to prove that at the next (college) level BEFORE they ask for the moon.
 

MegaBlue05

Heisman
Mar 8, 2014
10,311
19,648
66
We need to get out of the “have to have he shiny high school kid” mindset.

Sure, you go after any highschool kids that are projected lotto coming out of HS. And then you get 1-2 of the 30-50range that show the right mindset of wanting to be here for 2-4 years…..

But the majority of your key pieces should come from the portal. You’ll find an immediate contributor that is equal to, or better than, the not lotto highschool kid. Go get that highly productive soph/Jr from a bubble team….Oweh/Garrison types. Especially with your front court, I’d prefer the 20-22 year old that has developed in the weight room vs the 18 year old stick figure unless they are Davis/Noel aka guaranteed lotto. It’s easier to find highschool guards that are ready for college physicality but the learning curve is steeper w PF/C

Excellent point on going after older bigs.

I would rather have 6'9 240 lbs with 1-3 years of college weight training over 6'9, 195 lbs who just went to prom any day. That was one of my biggest complaints with Cal at the end. Some of our freshman bigs were not physically ready to play 30 mpg in the SEC. We often were bullied and manhandled inside.
 

tj4fun

All-Conference
Dec 22, 2013
810
1,260
93
While I would prefer a top portal guy, I can make a case for Ament. The sooner Pope can sign a talent like Ament and make him a lotto pick the better for future recruiting. Once Pope does that, he checks the box of having developed a lotto pick. When that happens, the sky is the limit for Pope. Unlike Cal, Pope will know how to integrate players like Ament into a cohesive unit with veterans and chase banners.
I agree that I would like for Pope to check that box. But I'm not sure that one comes if the other does! These freshman want immediate playing time regardless if they are ready or not.

If I have to pick one of the 2, I'm probably picking the portal player, unless it's a Davis, wall, cousins ect!
 
  • Like
Reactions: eb4ukcats