Barr just got a second

bamaEER

Freshman
May 29, 2001
32,435
60
0
only a complete total retard could watch that exchange and say Barr still owned his own testicles
Both Harris and Klobuchar are skilled prosecutors and I think both have way more game than HRC did.
 

wvu2007

Senior
Jan 2, 2013
21,220
457
0
owned? like when he had to ask the young guys behind him an answer to a question

I know that you are mad at your dad because he wasn't thrilled when you told him you were gay but no need to obsess over it.

Your father DESTROYED Khamehelia whether you like it or not.
 

tjebarr

Senior
Feb 3, 2007
25,122
917
0
I know that you are mad at your dad because he wasn't thrilled when you told him you were gay but no need to obsess over it.

Your father DESTROYED Khamehelia whether you like it or not.

And I destroyed your wife, that's why she is walking bowlegged
 

BoremanSouth

Redshirt
Jul 28, 2016
1,715
0
0
She sounded foolish

No, she didn't. She wasn't the one "grappling" with the meaning of the word "suggested." That was the American people's top justice official.

If anything our AG just castrated himself on CSPAN. Wait, is CSPAN deepstate fake news also?
 

tjebarr

Senior
Feb 3, 2007
25,122
917
0
No, she didn't. She wasn't the one "grappling" with the meaning of the word "suggested." That was the American people's top justice official.

If anything our AG just castrated himself on CSPAN. Wait, is CSPAN deepstate fake news also?

 

Mntneer

Sophomore
Oct 7, 2001
10,192
196
0
Shocked the left has started a coordinated attack against Barr.

He is going to destroy them.

What else are they going to attack? They didn't get what they wanted out of the Mueller report, so now lets go after Barr.
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,601
818
113
What else are they going to attack? They didn't get what they wanted out of the Mueller report, so now lets go after Barr.
They were careful to point out how Barr is discredited. It is a ruse because Barr is in a position to do some real damage to their cause.
 

Mntneer

Sophomore
Oct 7, 2001
10,192
196
0
They were careful to point out how Barr is discredited. It is a ruse because Barr is in a position to do some real damage to their cause.

Certainly. Discredit Barr and you shift narrative away from the fact that there was no crime. Make it about Barr and what his report said as opposed to the truth. That we've spent years and millions proving what we really knew all along.
 

bornaneer

All-Conference
Jan 23, 2014
30,947
1,662
113
What else are they going to attack? They didn't get what they wanted out of the Mueller report, so now lets go after Barr.
What part of Mueller report isn't already understood? There was no collusion with Russia and no obstruction of justice by Trump and the AG doesn't have any justice to obstruct because there isn't any crime in question. Dem attorneys trying to find process crimes and trying to set clever perjury traps because they couldn't establish the collusion narrative with anything factual is the problem with this whole charade.
 

Pospecteer

All-Conference
Dec 8, 2006
36,502
3,161
113
only a complete total retard could watch that exchange and say Barr still owned his own testicles

Do you realize that "retard" is as bad as using the "N" word? This more than anything shows the intellect of the posters who use it.
 

Pospecteer

All-Conference
Dec 8, 2006
36,502
3,161
113
Ummm. No.

UMM yes it is! Sorry, but having family members with Down's it is not appropriate to use that term. Get over it move on! This is not like 50 years ago when you could use an insensitive term and and say that it was taken out of context.
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,601
818
113
UMM yes it is! Sorry, but having family members with Down's it is not appropriate to use that term. Get over it move on! This is not like 50 years ago when you could use an insensitive term and and say that it was taken out of context.
Ok snowflake. What does Downs syndrome have to do with anything?
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,230
3,298
113
UMM yes it is! Sorry, but having family members with Down's it is not appropriate to use that term. Get over it move on! This is not like 50 years ago when you could use an insensitive term and and say that it was taken out of context.
Changing what you refer to them as doesn’t change the fact they have downs.