Booker 3-point shooting numbers:

[WACB]

After going 0 for 3, and 0 for 6 in the Texas and Eastern Kentucky games, he did not play in the Columbia game.

He has been on fire ever since. From now back to the UNC*** game, he is 22 of 33 for 67% in 9 games. Here are the %'s for those 9 games:

100%
83%
50%
100%
57%
100%
50%
0% (0 for 1)
50%

The reason I even took a look at these numbers is because ESPN called Indiana's Nick Zeisloft "a 3-point shooting specialist". Zeisloft is 27% in his last 9 games. Shouldn't there be some sort of threshold to be able to slap a "specialist" label on a player?

 

[SloopJohnBee]

Maybe he is just a specialist at "shooting" but not "making".

 

[WACB]

Originally posted by SloopJohnBee:
Maybe he is just a specialist at "shooting" but not "making".

 

[UKserialkiller]

Just my weekly reminder that I got laughed at by everyone when I said Booker would shoot around 49.2% this year.

Carry on.......

 

[Xception]

Stats ??pffft . Richie was a gunner , I done seen it !!!

 

[ZZBlueComet]

I honestly thought Booker would be with us 3-4 years, not looking that way now - but that's ok, if we have a great season.

I'm starting to think Ulis, Lee, Lyles and Poythress will return - possibly Dakari.

 

[SilentsAreGolden]

Originally posted by Willy4UK:

Just my weekly reminder that I got laughed at by everyone when I said Booker would shoot around 49.2% this year.

Carry on.......

What are you bragging about, you were way off. He's actually at 50%.

 

[STL_Cat]

And I'll post my same reply:

Redick was much, much more the
focal point of opposing team's defenses than either Lamb or Booker. I
love our guys. I think Booker has the potential to be a great one, but
those %s don't come close to telling the whole story.

 

[BBUK_anon]

Originally posted by SilentsAreGolden:

Originally posted by Willy4UK:

Just my weekly reminder that I got laughed at by everyone when I said Booker would shoot around 49.2% this year.

Carry on.......

What are you bragging about, you were way off. He's actually at 50%.

And that's NOT what they were laughing at you for.

 

[revcort]

Yeah, I was looking at Zeisloft's numbers...

He is still shooting 38% from 3 on the season, which is not terrible. So, that may be part of the reason ESPN describes him as a 3pt specialist.

It's not difficult to hit threes when you look like a punk and everyone leaves you wide open. That's what was going on early in the season. But once they realize you can hit that shot, people start to guard you. That's what has happened in more recent games.

In his last 9 games, Zeisloft's 3pt shooting has fallen off significantly. He's 8-30 in those games for 26.7%.

Another reason someone might call him a 3pt specialist is because that's practically all he does. Of his 94 total FG attempts on the season, 84 of those are from 3pt range. So, he doesn't do much else. Nearly 90% of his shots are from 3pt range.

Meanwhile, Booker has an excellent all-around game. He's excellent in the open floor and finishing on the break. He's been doing quite a bit more driving and pulling up for mid-range jumpers lately. And he also is shooting 50% from 3.

This post was edited on 1/27 10:07 AM by IL Wildcat

 

[UKserialkiller]

Originally posted by BBUK:

What are you bragging about, you were way off. He's actually at 50%.

And that's NOT what they were laughing at you for.

fair enough.

 

[Gary4UK]

Originally posted by Willy4UK:

Just my weekly reminder that I got laughed at by everyone when I said Booker would shoot around 49.2% this year.

Carry on.......

 

[rhstoess]

Originally posted by ZZBlueComet:
I honestly thought Booker would be with us 3-4 years, not looking that way now - but that's ok, if we have a great season.

I'm starting to think Ulis, Lee, Lyles and Poythress will return - possibly Dakari.

Lyles is as gone as towns and WCS are, he's getting huge draft recognition based on his potential as a big body that can shoot

 

[Bardstown]

Originally posted by SloopJohnBee:
Maybe he is just a specialist at "shooting" but not "making".