20 wins for a Big Ten team should always be rewarded. With the conference tourney upsets, maybe an NIT bid won't be forthcoming, but then the 'Cats should play in that new Vegas tourney, or even in the CBI if it comes to that.
Can we agree that the 20-win 'Cats deserve postseason?
- Thread starter bringbacktherantboard
- Start date
I really, really, really, really would prefer the NIT over a pay-to-play tourney, but agree that any postseason would help the younger core get a few more games in a somewhat elevated stakes environment.