Played in the slot some at UK and UNC. Good for him because it adds to his resume. Was anticipating this, good move.
Would not be shocked to see Craig Yeast added as a grad assistant. He would take over WRs if and when Scott moves on.How foes that make you feel? Any insight on his experience w the passing game?
This is very good for Chad IMO and good for us. Good coaches can coach different positions, and he has a ton of talent to work with. I was actually hoping they would move him to WR. I think it will be a great personality fit for those guys.
True but I think most of our drops were about lack of concentration. To many outside factors in their heads , they weren't focused. Just my opinion.I don't know if a coach can do much about drops. They can coach technique, route running and training habits but to catching a football involves having "good hands." The things they can coach should help reduce the number of drops, but you either have "good hands" or you don't.
He has about 10 11 scholarship wr to deal with and they all want they ball. I think he can relate better to those guys than Mainord.This is very good for Chad IMO and good for us. Good coaches can coach different positions, and he has a ton of talent to work with. I was actually hoping they would move him to WR. I think it will be a great personality fit for those guys.
Does he have any experience coaching WRs? Alot of drops last season
hats what would worry me. There are lots of nuances to route running and playing receiver. Its not justsomething you know how to do professionally because youve coached football. We compete at the highest level. Not saying he wont do a great job, but his lack of experience worries me.I think there are certain things a coach can do to influence a higher percentage of receptions, but I don't think that is really coaching. He isn't teaching them anything new, but is instead just introducing more repetition or competition to make their receptions more commonplace. For instance, at one point many coaches were using tennis balls fired out of the tennis ball machines to force the players to use their eyes more and to focus on a smaller target. That isn't really coaching any new technique to the player, but it probably does have some results in increasing the catching percentages. You might also have certain games of reward or punishment for dropping balls. You drop one in practice then you have to catch 100 out of the machine at the end, or something like that. Still, it isn't improving technique as much as it is repetition and some concentration.
However, what is key is the route running. Selling the defender on different moves and getting them off balance., and making sure you're making clean cuts. If you do those things then you're often more wide open and you can concentrate on the ball a bit more because you're not draped on by a defender, you can adjust to the ball without worrying about it getting picked off, and you're not worried about getting hit by a secondary defender.
I'd remind you that Tee Martin went from a college QB to a HS volunteer asst to QB coach at New Mexico to the WR coach at UK to WR coach at the real USC to USC's OC in a short period of time. If guys are smart and are willing to work at their craft it'll pay off for them. It did for Martin and I have no doubt will for Scott.
I'm hoping Scott will do better at WR coach than Tee Martin. Martin wasn't a very good coach at this position, not at UK anyway. I remember when they asked about problems at receiver, his response was to the effect of "I don't know, I've never played the position".
And
hats what would worry me. There are lots of nuances to route running and playing receiver. Its not justsomething you know how to do professionally because youve coached football. We compete at the highest level. Not saying he wont do a great job, but his lack of experience worries me.
bring back the tennis ball machine