Coach K a OAD Man Now; Frosh Ineligibility "Discriminatory"

TUL

Junior
Oct 23, 2014
635
202
0
Having freshmen be ineligible to play has nothing to do with one and done.
 

TruBluCatFan

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
19,325
10,135
113
Well he is right. It is discriminatory. Who does it primarily keep from going pro and making money? It's not the white country club golf or tennis prodigy.
Posted from Rivals Mobile
 
Nov 15, 2008
38,645
57,515
0
NCAA will never be able to keep freshmen ineligible.

It's a butthurt argument from sad sacks with inferior teams from inferior conferences.
 

BoulderCat_rivals187983

All-Conference
May 22, 2002
7,871
3,227
0
Originally posted by TUL:
Having freshmen be ineligible to play has nothing to do with one and done.
What do you think it's about then?

It's never going to fly either way. The more likely thing is some sort of adjustment to the APR which forces teams to have more multi year players. What's amusing to me is that the program most everyone puts on a pedestal, Duke starts more freshmen than UK, and has a least one OAD player. Many, many programs across the country have freshmen who start or get significant minutes. I don't think there's any doubt the people floating this rule are trying to get rid of OAD's while conveniently ignoring how many teams are playing freshmen. The fact that it's only being proposed for basketball and football leaves no doubt what it's aimed at.