First off, there is technically no ACC Regular Season champion. Cheats can cut down nets/talk about a championship all till their face turn wussy blue. Fact is, ACC bylaws state the ACC Champion is the tournament champion: no more, no less. Plus, add in the fact that schedules are complete unbalanced, IMHO, the champion being the Tournament winner is the most fair.
1. Unless something drastic like UVA loses in the ACC Quarters, they are a lock for Columbia. Which means Cheats OR Duke will get Columbia, but not both. So, IMHO, Duke and Cheats are separated for the first two rounds!
2. IMHO, if Williamson comes back and looks impressive, and we win the ACC Tournament, we are a lock for the second one seed at worst. The committee should look at the losses without Zion as almost not happening...
1. Unless something drastic like UVA loses in the ACC Quarters, they are a lock for Columbia. Which means Cheats OR Duke will get Columbia, but not both. So, IMHO, Duke and Cheats are separated for the first two rounds!
2. IMHO, if Williamson comes back and looks impressive, and we win the ACC Tournament, we are a lock for the second one seed at worst. The committee should look at the losses without Zion as almost not happening...