Covid "Rule out"/72 Hour Holds (Long)

Jul 28, 2006
11,259
15,778
113
I started to post this in the Covid thread but felt as though it may not be seen by as many posters, and I'd like as many opinions on this as possible. ( I expect a few smart *** replies; it's the Paddock after all)

First, for anyone who may not be aware of what a 72 Hour Hold is: this is a law that is, in one form or another, on the books in each state. It says that, in effect, if you come to the hospital and present as a danger to yourself, or others, a doctor has the legal right to hold you for evaluation, and or treatment, for up to 72 hours. (Weekends and holidays do not count towards the 72 hours, btw.)

Many times when this occurs an Officer for UKPD, be it from the force or from Security, is to be placed in the room with the patient so that they can protect the medical staff, and the patient themselves. UK also has trained Patient Safety Technicians who can stay with the non violent patients, but there's not nearly enough of them to go around, and @ 90% of holds are non violent; most are termed S.I, ( suicidal inclinations). As you might imagine, we deal with some of the worst in society anyway, and from time to time have to go "hands on" in order to restrain them from hurting others or themselves. We also have people come in who are, quite literally, insane. Those are fun.....not.

With this virus in the picture we now have some patients who are on holds who MIGHT have Covid, and of course it takes up to 12 hours to get the results back. These patients are in a special "Locked Respiratory Unit" until it is determined whether they have it or not. This is where I come in.

On Friday we had more holds than we had people to be posted with them, and no techs available, so they called me in off of patrol to sit with one in the locked unit. Now, UKPD policy has always been that, until we have a negative Covid result back on the patient, we sit outside the room and observe the patient. (Very boring work most of the time)

So, as I'm sitting outside the room making sure all the paperwork, legal and procedural, was in order and fully filled out, a nurse comes up to me and asks whether the patient has been "wanded". (We normally wand a patient with a metal detector to ensure they don't have a gun, knife, etc on their person.) I told her no, and she snapped in a hateful tone, "WHY"? I explained to her that policy states that, until we know the patient is Covid negative we don't go into the room unless the patient becomes violent towards medical staff. On top of that, this particular patient had already been stripped down to his underwear and placed in an "elopement gown", which is just a regular hospital gown but is blue in color, to signify the patient is on a hold. Another nurse and med tech had done this 30 minutes prior; the guy didn't have anything on him.....duh.

She began spouting off how his nurse couldn't enter the room to give the patient his medicine, (guy was in a LOT of pain, it was quite obvious, until he was wanded. I repeated what I'd said before, and that the guy only had his gown on and that the other nurse would have noticed had he had anything at all on his person, again....duh. She wasn't having it, and stated she'd be making some calls. I told her she could call the Chief, I wasn't going in the room, period. (Btw, this isn't legal on the nurse's part, and she COULD lose her job over this for refusing treatment to the patient) The same nurse returned @ 30 minutes later with a printed copy of what is expected of Patient Safety Techs who are with a hold patient. I told the nurse, "I'm not a PST, I work for UKPD and our policy is as I stated to you before.

At this point the guy's wife was becoming livid because her husband was suffering in pain and the nurse refused to enter the room until I wanded him. She understood my position and wasn't angry with me, but she was furious with the nurse.

Now, by this point Legal is getting involved, Compliance, etc. **** was hitting the fan. A Lt. told me to don PPE and go sit in the room; I refused. They began calling other Officers; EVERY. SINGLE Officer also refused until we had the test results back, every single one. So what did they do? The doctor lifted the 72 hour hold, I went back to patrol, and the patient got his medicine. The guy had made a comment that he shouldn't have made, but he said it while in terrible pain, it happens, I've seen it before. Not excusing what he said of course, but sometimes we all say things we regret later, and this was one of those cases with this guy.. It was quite obvious from the get go this guy was no threat to himself or anyone else, and besides that, he was in no shape to be a threat anyway.

Saturday morning we learned that our direct supervisor had been suspended without pay for a week because he too had refused to enter the room, and because not one of his Officers would either. It's B.S, because we were following established policy, and because it was pointless to potentially expose ourselves to the virus when we could do the same thing by observing through the door.

We protect everyone on campus equally, but especially in the E.R department we've "saved their bacon" countless times over from truly terrible people, yet a lot of the nurses treat us like crap, and it's only gotten worse of late. I myself am seriously considering leaving, it's just not worth it anymore.

Without giving out the patients info of course, I've given you pretty much all you need to know; how do you think you would have handled the situation? What, if anything, would you have done differently?

Btw, I was SO damn proud that all of us stood together, united on this.
 

chroix

Heisman
Jul 22, 2013
10,021
25,206
113
Sounds to me like everyone should have just waited for his test results. Also without knowing what he said it’s hard to judge but I’d assume had he not said what he said he wouldn’t have been in this position. Sounds like his fault more than anything.
 
Jul 28, 2006
11,259
15,778
113
Sounds to me like everyone should have just waited for his test results. Also without knowing what he said it’s hard to judge but I’d assume had he not said what he said he wouldn’t have been in this position. Sounds like his fault more than anything.
Your right in that, had he not made a particular comment, he would never have been placed on a hold, but it does happen, and most of the time people say something because they're in a great deal of pain that they otherwise wouldn't normally say or feel.

Sometimes, not in this case, but sometimes the patients are angry with the doctor who placed them on a hold, but they can't understand that these doctors see, and deal with, all kinds. Suicidal and homicidal people are the norm, and these doctors don't know you, so if you make a comment that you want to die, or harm others, etc, they HAVE to take it seriously, they have no choice.
 

chroix

Heisman
Jul 22, 2013
10,021
25,206
113
Sounds like conflicting protocols more than anything. Not sure why you’d be proud of your fellow officers but not seem to respect that the nurses were doing the same thing following their own protocols. Seems like this is an issue for the higher ups to sort out and that your supervisor shouldn’t have been suspended.
 

JB875

All-Conference
Mar 10, 2004
2,401
1,264
73
You’re upset with her for having the exact same concern as you: not wanting to unnecessarily risk getting harmed by a patient. You’ve outlined your position well but are being completely ignorant of everyone else’s.
 
  • Like
Reactions: chroix

Elbridge

All-Conference
Aug 9, 2005
1,149
1,162
48
When I attended UK the UKPD were a bunch of douchebags. Just my opinion.
 

420grover

All-American
Mar 26, 2006
7,703
7,860
0
 
  • Like
Reactions: chroix

Ron Mehico

Heisman
Jan 4, 2008
15,473
33,054
0
Serious question: does somebody sign up to be a campus cop and expect the job to not completely suck ***?
 
Jul 28, 2006
11,259
15,778
113
You’re upset with her for having the exact same concern as you: not wanting to unnecessarily risk getting harmed by a patient. You’ve outlined your position well but are being completely ignorant of everyone else’s.
Honestly, I wasn't "upset" with her for position, if anything I was aggravated that she failed to grasp the situation, which was the fact the man was no threat to her in regards to any type of weapon, but I was in fact upset with her for allowing that man to suffer needlessly.

I guess it's one of those things where you had to be there; it was quite apparent she HAD to be right, and she wanted to have the final say, rather than actually caring for the patient. Trust me, had I felt there was even a tiny chance of her being in danger, I would have not hesitated to agree with her and figure something out.

She had nothing to fear at all from the man, she was in the wrong from the start. Obviously, anyone can attack another person with their bare hands, it happens, and I was right there had that happened, but as I said, the man was in a gown and didn't have anything at all on his person, and she knew it, she just wanted to be a *****, it's really just that simple.

The larger issue was the fact they insisted an Officer STAY in the room all the time with the man, and that was never going to happen until we knew he tested negative for Covid.
 
Jul 28, 2006
11,259
15,778
113
When I attended UK the UKPD were a bunch of douchebags. Just my opinion.
I'm sorry you had a bad experience, I truly am. I'd be less than honest if I told you every Officer was the best there is, but I've seen many, many acts of kindness from a lot of Officers. Not sure when you attended, but I can assure you training is a very high priority, and with whats occurred in the past few months, even more training is being given. That's always a good thing.
 

bthaunert

Heisman
Apr 4, 2007
29,518
21,619
0
Thank God nurses and doctors are willing to go into rooms with COVID patients
My wife is an ICU nurse at a hospital outside of Baltimore. She has had many days when all 3 of her patients are COVID patients. She has seen more than her fair share pass away. She has had to tell a few of them that they need to talk/FaceTime with their family (no hospital visitors allowed) because they are going to be intubated and most likely never be extubated.

Agree with you. Thank god they are willing to put their health on the risk for other people’s lives.
 
Jul 28, 2006
11,259
15,778
113
If it's against policy how was he suspended? I'm confused
He followed established UKPD policy in this matter. We're all in agreement the only reason he was suspended was because every Officer refused a Lt's order to go stay in the room, but more importantly, the supervisor also refused.

Even though he followed policy, the fact he refused a direct order, (even though it went against policy), pissed off the Lt. and his ego was hurt. That's the reason he's suspended, IMO.

I'm off until Tuesday and I know this isn't the last we'll hear of this. Legal is involved, Compliance is involved, the Chief is involved, etc, etc. If they reverse course and demand we stay in the room with either a rule out, or even with a positive, expect a lot of us to resign.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PhDcat2018

CB3UK

Hall of Famer
Apr 15, 2012
62,663
102,933
78
Sounds like you did the right thing. I guess Im having trouble understanding how the hell they administered said test and putting him in hospital gowns without visually assessing whether perhaps he had an AK47 or Bowie knife keistered?

If you're waiting on the 12 hr results so you can verify if its safe to approach....how did they adminster the initial test? Sounds like someone higher up the pay ladder needs to remove head from ***.
 

Elbridge

All-Conference
Aug 9, 2005
1,149
1,162
48
I guess it's one of those things where you had to be there; it was quite apparent she HAD to be right, and she wanted to have the final say, rather than actually caring for the patient.
Sounds like you had to be right too. Back in the late 1980's early 1990's UKPD seemed to have a chip on their shoulders in that they didn't have the chance to go to college but had to police the ones that were able to and were sure to let the students know who was boss. I'm guessing not much has changed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: chroix

UKGrad93

Heisman
Jun 20, 2007
17,437
22,789
0
This sounds like the sort of thing that needs to be worked out at higher levels. Everyone (nurses, doctors, PD) all need to understand each others roles and responsibilities in these cases. IMO, the suspension of the supervisor was wrong and should be reversed.

One possible result of all of this is that you and other officers receive more training and are fit-tested for N95 respirators, so that you can safely enter the room and wand the patient. The scenario reminds me of the early days of dealing with meth labs. Hazmat teams were trained to deal with the chemicals and the cops were trained to deal with the fact that it was a crime scene. Eventually, the cops got the training and gear to do the job.

I work at a university medical center (similar size to UK). Five years or so ago, we had a case where a patient that was in police custody walked out. Seems like the officer from a neighboring county dropped him off and left without posting a guard. In this case, the police were upset. However, the hospital responded that they are a medical facility, not a jail. I think some formal policies got worked out as a result of that.

I understand that UKPD would be a good choice for dealing with dangerous patients, but it doesn't seem like this would routinely fall under police duties, unless the patient is actively threatening or a known criminal already under police custody. It sounds like UK Med needs to hire more trained techs to deal with this.

My own interactions with our campus police, they all seem mostly like a good bunch and are trained to the same level as any other law enforcement in the area. The pay seems really low though. I know that one of the Lts drives for Ubber on the side.
 

jwheat

Heisman
Aug 21, 2005
97,626
24,206
42
You signed up for a job that requires you to enforce unconstitutional laws.
 
Jul 28, 2006
11,259
15,778
113
Sounds like you had to be right too. Back in the late 1980's early 1990's UKPD seemed to have a chip on their shoulders in that they didn't have the chance to go to college but had to police the ones that were able to and were sure to let the students know who was boss. I'm guessing not much has changed.
Actually, I WAS in the right, as I, and the entire shift, followed established policy, nothing more. The nurse simply wouldn't listen to reason. As I said, if I felt there ANY danger to any medical staff, we would have figured something out. There wasn't, and she knew it.

Nobody, including myself, has a "chip on their shoulder", at least none I work with each day. Not sure why you feel like you have to be this way towards me, but whatever.
 
Jul 28, 2006
11,259
15,778
113
This sounds like the sort of thing that needs to be worked out at higher levels. Everyone (nurses, doctors, PD) all need to understand each others roles and responsibilities in these cases. IMO, the suspension of the supervisor was wrong and should be reversed.

One possible result of all of this is that you and other officers receive more training and are fit-tested for N95 respirators, so that you can safely enter the room and wand the patient. The scenario reminds me of the early days of dealing with meth labs. Hazmat teams were trained to deal with the chemicals and the cops were trained to deal with the fact that it was a crime scene. Eventually, the cops got the training and gear to do the job.

I work at a university medical center (similar size to UK). Five years or so ago, we had a case where a patient that was in police custody walked out. Seems like the officer from a neighboring county dropped him off and left without posting a guard. In this case, the police were upset. However, the hospital responded that they are a medical facility, not a jail. I think some formal policies got worked out as a result of that.

I understand that UKPD would be a good choice for dealing with dangerous patients, but it doesn't seem like this would routinely fall under police duties, unless the patient is actively threatening or a known criminal already under police custody. It sounds like UK Med needs to hire more trained techs to deal with this.

My own interactions with our campus police, they all seem mostly like a good bunch and are trained to the same level as any other law enforcement in the area. The pay seems really low though. I know that one of the Lts drives for Ubber on the side.
Thank you for the rational, informed response, much appreciated.

Actually, every Officer has been fit tested, but even so policy states we don't sit in a room with a Covid rule out, much less a positive Covid patient. What policy states is we sit outside the room; the only time we enter is if the patient is aggressive towards staff.

I'm hopeful cooler heads will prevail and get this lined out across all departments, like you suggested.
 

UKGrad93

Heisman
Jun 20, 2007
17,437
22,789
0
Thank you for the rational, informed response, much appreciated.

Actually, every Officer has been fit tested, but even so policy states we don't sit in a room with a Covid rule out, much less a positive Covid patient. What policy states is we sit outside the room; the only time we enter is if the patient is aggressive towards staff.

I'm hopeful cooler heads will prevail and get this lined out across all departments, like you suggested.
My thoughts are that the policy may need to change to allow for an officer to enter the room and wand the patient before test results are back. Not that you would always have the officer in the room. From a hazard control perspective , engineering controls should e first line of protection (the separate room & door), next would be administrative procedures (do not enter the room), last is personal protective equipment (respirator, gown, gloves).
 
  • Like
Reactions: kritikalcat