Also, the PA lottery benefits senior citizens.“There’s the rub”
Same deal with the North Carolina “Education” Lottery.
Same deal with United Fund claiming you can designate your contribution.
Also, the PA lottery benefits senior citizens.“There’s the rub”
Same deal with the North Carolina “Education” Lottery.
Same deal with United Fund claiming you can designate your contribution.
I quit. They dropped me. Probably at my age they thought I passed . lolThey still count life members who quit. I asked to be removed and said I will still be counted
This is a great fact, but not readily apparent to most people, in most fundraisingExcept. Money is fungible. Designated donations just mean that you don't have to worry about those areas and can move other general funds away from that to where you want them.
That's what my home state did with lottery funds that were designated for education. Is the education budget higher because of that?? Nope. The budget is about the same, but the general funds once used there have been moved elsewhere to balance other parts of the budget.
The point is not fraud but deception. General budget and/or undesignated gifts can be segued to other areas when designated donations exceed a quota/need. I was going to pay to send my kid to football camp but he earned a scholarship. Kept some of the money in my "general fund".You get a receipt where the money went.
Are you alleging theft by deception and fraud?
The point is not fraud but deception. General budget and/or undesignated gifts can be segued to other areas when designated donations exceed a quota/need. I was going to pay to send my kid to football camp but he earned a scholarship. Kept some of the money in my "general fund".
For the most part, folks who would potentially be swayed by such ridiculous actions are too dumb and, therefore, poor, to donate much, or they've grown old, lost their T and are no longer interested in sports.Put the Statue and player plaques back and properly honor Joe and watch the money jump.
Sounds like North Carolina.Except. Money is fungible. Designated donations just mean that you don't have to worry about those areas and can move other general funds away from that to where you want them.
That's what my home state did with lottery funds that were designated for education. Is the education budget higher because of that?? Nope. The budget is about the same, but the general funds once used there have been moved elsewhere to balance other parts of the budget.
They can just set up a gofundme. Problem solved.FWIW: And I mentioned this is the Blog, I think PSU probably UNDER stated the likely philanthropy that will most likely be realized wrt the whole Beaver Stadium thing.
Unfortunately, even at double or triple their projections, the philanthropic money would not be more than a drop in the bucket wrt overcoming the future budget deficits
For the most part, folks who would potentially be swayed by such ridiculous actions are too dumb and, therefore, poor, to donate much, or they've grown old, lost their T and are no longer interested in sports.
I'm reminded of a former board member who has made it his life's work to attack the university, no matter how irrational his words and actions, and no matter how wasteful of university resources ... who assured us that the money would flow in if things like the field was renamed in Joe's honor ... meanwhile, he had just begged online for tens of thousands of dollars just to afford an obviously meritless vanity project lawsuit.
PSU is planning on funding the men’s tennis program with $600,000 this year. If I give $5k to the men’s tennis program, they don’t now fund it at $605,000. They use my $5k, kick in $595,000, and do whatever they want with the extra $5k.Exactly what I said. A designated donation goes to the place specified.
WrongPSU is planning on funding the men’s tennis program with $600,000 this year. If I give $5k to the men’s tennis program, they don’t now fund it at $605,000. They use my $5k, kick in $595,000, and do whatever they want with the extra $5k.
For the most part, folks who would potentially be swayed by such ridiculous actions are too dumb and, therefore, poor, to donate much, or they've grown old, lost their T and are no longer interested in sports.
I'm reminded of a former board member who has made it his life's work to attack the university, no matter how irrational his words and actions, and no matter how wasteful of university resources ... who assured us that the money would flow in if things like the field was renamed in Joe's honor were undertaken ... meanwhile, he had just begged online for tens of thousands of dollars just to afford an obviously meritless vanity project lawsuit.
PSU board of trustees allowed an incompetent agenda driven AD , Sandy Barber, to reward James Franklin with such a lucrative contract extension not based on his performance as a football coach, but for every other reason other than performance. Read between the lines. This was and is the boards fault .‘The money does not exist’: Why the buyouts for college football coaches are setting off alarm bells | CNN
PSU very prominently mentioned.
Some excerpts from this very "on-point" article:
1) Penn State athletic director Pat Kraft, who through a spokesperson declined comment for this story, has insisted that Franklin’s buyout is “an athletics issue. This is not the institution’s issue. We in athletics are covering the costs.”
But from where? “No one has the answer,’’ one of the board members said.
2) Except now, as some of those bills come due at the same time revenue sharing comes into existence, the very real question is no longer an existential crisis. Just where is the money coming from?
“I have no idea,’’ said another board member at an affected school. “The money does not exist.’’
“Finally, someone said it out loud,’’ said a board of trustees member at another institution. “This is so irresponsible.’’
“No one is flying the plane,’’ a board member at one of the schools affected said. “There’s not even a plane. It’s a hot air balloon. Whatever way the wind blows, that’s the way college sports go.’’
3) Except somewhere along the line the spending steamrolled ahead of the profits.
Facility one-upsmanship, all in the name of attracting better recruits, led to practice facilities with mini-golf courses (Clemson), marble showers in the locker room (Oregon) and sensory deprivation tanks (Georgia). Then came more staff – to run the analytics and sports performance and nutrition and, in some cases, the head coach. Texas has not one, not two but three special assistants to the head coach
According to the KnightNewhouse College Athletics Database, in the last 10 years Penn State’s football spending has jumped 113% but the entire department’s revenues have grown only 83%. At LSU, football spending jumped 44% and revenues just 40%.
In the same decade, football coaching salaries (the entire staff) jumped 106% in State College and 90% in Baton Rouge while ticket sales only added an additional 33% and 37% respectively and donor contributions jumped 53% and 66%.
4) Virginia Tech recently announced a planned $229 million investment in athletics over the next four years. Along with seeking donor support for $30 million of that annually, the university said there will be “limited increases in student fees.’’ In 2024, student fees generated $14.5 million for the athletic department.
“That deal should terrify boards everywhere,’’ one of the trustees said.
https://www.cnn.com/2025/10/31/sport/college-football-coach-buyouts
FWIW:
Serendipitously, I just posted this Blog a few hours ago:
Penn State Athletics: The Fiscal Cliff Is Closer Than They Think – BARRY FENCHAK
Um the board allowed the moving up of Erikson, allowed Uncle Fester to become e AD, allowed Barron as Pres, allowed Sandy as AD. IMO Franklin was the least of their poor decisions.PSU board of trustees allowed an incompetent agenda driven AD , Sandy Barber, to reward James Franklin with such a lucrative contract extension not based on his performance as a football coach, but for every other reason other than performance. Read between the lines. This was and is the boards fault .
Cool, then you have no idea how it actually works.Wrong
I know you replied with dunb nonsense hours ago.Cool, then you have no idea how it actually works.
No. But. The money that is designated does go to the place it's supposed to go to. But it doesn't change the budget for that area. It doesn't automatically give that area a a larger budget, just because someone donated to it. Sot it's a bit of smoke and mirrors. The budget stays the same.You get a receipt where the money went.
Are you alleging theft by deception and fraud?
I guess we can just mail it in FedEx.I believe PSU is planning its next fundraising campaign. No doubt it will be a dogsh|t campaign.
For the most part, folks who would potentially be swayed by such ridiculous actions are too dumb and, therefore, poor, to donate much, or they've grown old, lost their T and are no longer interested in sports.
I'm reminded of a former board member who has made it his life's work to attack the university, no matter how irrational his words and actions, and no matter how wasteful of university resources ... who assured us that the money would flow in if things like the field was renamed in Joe's honor were undertaken ... meanwhile, he had just begged online for tens of thousands of dollars just to afford an obviously meritless vanity project lawsuit.
For the most part, folks who would potentially be swayed by such ridiculous actions are too dumb and, therefore, poor, to donate much, or they've grown old, lost their T and are no longer interested in sports.
I'm reminded of a former board member who has made it his life's work to attack the university, no matter how irrational his words and actions, and no matter how wasteful of university resources ... who assured us that the money would flow in if things like the field was renamed in Joe's honor were undertaken ... meanwhile, he had just begged online for tens of thousands of dollars just to afford an obviously meritless vanity project lawsuit.
And, from what I understand, the real puppet master behind the Franklin extension was then-BOT Chair Matt Schuyler (sp), who pressured the apparently spineless Sandy and the BOT into giving James the renegotiated deal.PSU board of trustees allowed an incompetent agenda driven AD , Sandy Barber, to reward James Franklin with such a lucrative contract extension not based on his performance as a football coach, but for every other reason other than performance. Read between the lines. This was and is the boards fault .
I don't think anyone needs to "read between the lines".PSU board of trustees allowed an incompetent agenda driven AD , Sandy Barber, to reward James Franklin with such a lucrative contract extension not based on his performance as a football coach, but for every other reason other than performance. Read between the lines. This was and is the boards fault .
Important info from Bob78 ^^^^^^^And, from what I understand, the real puppet master behind the Franklin extension was then-BOT Chair Matt Schuyler (sp), who pressured the apparently spineless Sandy and the BOT into giving James the renegotiated deal.
For those who haven't read... Schuyler is now the head of HR for the Agency that Jimmy Sexton works for. Sexton is James' agent.
My Goodness! What a wild and crazy coincidence and sequence of events!
I'm not sayin', I'm just sayin'.
Purely coincidental. Sexton's influence on the inner workings of CAA is limited.And, from what I understand, the real puppet master behind the Franklin extension was then-BOT Chair Matt Schuyler (sp), who pressured the apparently spineless Sandy and the BOT into giving James the renegotiated deal.
For those who haven't read... Schuyler is now the head of HR for the Agency that Jimmy Sexton works for. Sexton is James' agent.
My Goodness! What a wild and crazy coincidence and sequence of events!
I'm not sayin', I'm just sayin'.
LoL....