What are their views on “Song of the South?”With Disney+ I’ve seen every Disney movie about 500 times between my 5 and 3 year old. Except for one glaring exception - the princess and the frog. Are my children racist?
Portraying gay or trans characters in children's media is not grooming any more than portraying straight cis characters is grooming. If you think otherwise, you are a bigot.Sadly, you’ll get a few posters chime in about how grooming children is no big deal and if you’re opposed to it you’re bigoted.
The vast majority of folks are cis. Most of reality is cis. No need to introduce children into the weirdness of a very small minority until they are old enough to understand it.Portraying gay or trans characters in children's media is not grooming any more than portraying straight cis characters is grooming. If you think otherwise, you are a bigot.
Portraying gay or trans characters in children's media is not grooming any more than portraying straight cis characters is grooming. If you think otherwise, you are a bigot.
Zzz. Big surprise that you’re all for this and call someone a bigot. Heterosexuality is natural. Your existence is a result of such a thing. Kids aren't confused by a mom and a dad on a show. Despite what your TV tells you, half the population isn't gay nor are they trans.Portraying gay or trans characters in children's media is not grooming any more than portraying straight cis characters is grooming. If you think otherwise, you are a bigot.
A gay family member a couple of weeks ago said he has zero problem with this legislation and he does not want kids that young being taught about hetero or homo sexual content. He was floored that this was even an issue. I agree with him.Sadly, you’ll get a few posters chime in about how grooming children is no big deal and if you’re opposed to it you’re bigoted.
The shame brigade and its response. Liberals love to shame and bully people into compliance.Busted by Faux Newz.
The term cis is offensive to me.Portraying gay or trans characters in children's media is not grooming any more than portraying straight cis characters is grooming. If you think otherwise, you are a bigot.
Portraying gay or trans characters in children's media is not grooming any more than portraying straight cis characters is grooming. If you think otherwise, you are a bigot.
As opposed to legislate compliance. Don't Say Gay caveman because that would be illegal down there!The shame brigade and its response. Liberals love to shame and bully people into compliance.
There's something wrong with your mind if you're thinking about having sex with children and wanting to talk about having sex with children. Showing two men who are a couple is no more sexual than showing a man and woman as a couple, and neither has anything to do with having sex with children, but your mind goes to having sex with children. Get your sick, twisted mind out of the gutter and stop thinking about diddling kids you pervert.How do you say you’re a pedophile without saying you’re a pedophile…
It's not just homosexual topics that I think need to be avoided here. Kids at that age don't need to be taught any sort if sexual material unless by their parents.No. Protecting young children from homosexual topics and gender confusion in an effort to preserve their innocence as long as possible is not bigoted. It’s what sane parents do.
What’s the big deal. Peter Pan was gay as F.
As opposed to legislate compliance. Don't Say Gay caveman because that would be illegal down there!
I get what you’re saying. People have to learn at some point that not everybody’s the same.Portraying gay or trans characters in children's media is not grooming any more than portraying straight cis characters is grooming. If you think otherwise, you are a bigot.
They are totally against using common terms such as him, her, he and she because that might be offensive but are totally okay with derogatory terms that could be offensive like bigot, chauvinist. racist, etc. It apparently is only offensive if they deem it as such.Zzz. Big surprise that you’re all for this and call someone a bigot. Heterosexuality is natural. Your existence is a result of such a thing. Kids aren't confused by a mom and a dad on a show. Despite what your TV tells you, half the population isn't gay nor are they trans.
Your use of “cis” is a dead giveaway of how brainwashed you are. We all knew it because of the covid thread that you're a far left nut so it was no surprise how you're all about wanting to talk about gay sex or sex in general to kids.
I suggest you don't stop there. You should mention your pronouns in every post as a way to not offend someone. Perhaps a Ukrainian flag or an "I'm vaccinated" profile pic filter as well.
I thought I was responding to you with my previous post, but it still applies to James, so I’ll leave it there and you can look back.There's something wrong with your mind if you're thinking about having sex with children and wanting to talk about having sex with children. Showing two men who are a couple is no more sexual than showing a man and woman as a couple, and neither has anything to do with having sex with children, but your mind goes to having sex with children. Get your sick, twisted mind out of the gutter and stop thinking about diddling kids you pervert.
I demand no such thing. Nobody is talking or thinking about sexualizing children except you. You're clearly depraved and sick. Putting you on ignore, I don't engage with people who think about and talk about sex with children.I thought I was responding to you with my previous post, but it still applies to James, so I’ll leave it there and you can look back.
Youre demanding the sexualization of children and then calling others a pervert? You’re sick and honestly too stupid to even try to convince. Go seek help you twisted f&ck.
Hard disagree. If parents want their kids to view gay people as lesser, or othered, that's on them to teach their kids. Schools and media shouldn't be censored from portraying people as they exist just because some people are bigot who think there's something wrong or dirty or "confusing" about two men or two women being a couple. Gay kids exist. Kids with gay parents exist. Straight kids of straight parents will go to school with these kids, interact with them in the real world. We shouldn't censor our media and schools just because some people are bigoted toward gay people.I get what you’re saying. People have to learn at some point that not everybody’s the same.
But especially for young children, this is the place of the parent, not the school, or media.
The legislation does not mention homosexual topics and would address a teacher teaching heterosexual intimacy to kindergartners.It's not just homosexual topics that I think need to be avoided here. Kids at that age don't need to be taught any sort if sexual material unless by their parents.
Yeah. Not a hard concept to understand. Teach reading, writing, math, hard science and how to learn on your own. We don’t need kids learning about sex and gender issues at such a young age. Let parents parent. Some teachers get very defensive about their role as teachers and not as the parents of their classes.But especially for young children, this is the place of the parent, not the school, or media.