Disney

Status
Not open for further replies.

funKYcat75

Well-known member
Apr 10, 2008
32,270
40,647
112
Total Lez
 
  • Like
Reactions: Col. Angus

JumperJack

New member
Oct 30, 2002
21,997
65,619
0
Things that seemed paranoid or conspiratorial a decade ago are now openly stated.

I mean, what can you say. I’ve seen videos from teachers all week stating that they believe they have a right to cross boundaries with students. Now a corporation says the quiet part out loud.

Some of it is the reality of an ideology finally coming into the open.

But some of it is our fault, all sides. We’ve allowed corporations to basically own us. No wonder they think they should implement their own agendas and that they know better.
 

JoeSwag

New member
Jan 30, 2022
2,040
8,078
0
Kind of wild how they take a ton of money from China and China would never produce this crap to their youth.

China bans 'sissy men' from TV to encourage more masculinity in young men


Hiring the woke cult who are super desperate to talk about sex to kids is really quite a feat for HR. I suppose you hire a nut in HR, you end up with these type of ideological promotions and hires.



Yes, let's definitely get rid of terms 99 percent of the population is cool with so we can cater to a group of mentally ill people that do not even make up half a percent of the country.
 

Crums Bald Spot

Well-known member
Aug 22, 2001
9,255
12,695
113
Portraying gay or trans characters in children's media is not grooming any more than portraying straight cis characters is grooming. If you think otherwise, you are a bigot.
The vast majority of folks are cis. Most of reality is cis. No need to introduce children into the weirdness of a very small minority until they are old enough to understand it.
 

JoeSwag

New member
Jan 30, 2022
2,040
8,078
0
Portraying gay or trans characters in children's media is not grooming any more than portraying straight cis characters is grooming. If you think otherwise, you are a bigot.
Zzz. Big surprise that you’re all for this and call someone a bigot. Heterosexuality is natural. Your existence is a result of such a thing. Kids aren't confused by a mom and a dad on a show. Despite what your TV tells you, half the population isn't gay nor are they trans.

Your use of “cis” is a dead giveaway of how brainwashed you are. We all knew it because of the covid thread that you're a far left nut so it was no surprise how you're all about wanting to talk about gay sex or sex in general to kids.

I suggest you don't stop there. You should mention your pronouns in every post as a way to not offend someone. Perhaps a Ukrainian flag or an "I'm vaccinated" profile pic filter as well.
 

Beatle Bum

Well-known member
Sep 1, 2002
39,235
57,842
113
Sadly, you’ll get a few posters chime in about how grooming children is no big deal and if you’re opposed to it you’re bigoted.
A gay family member a couple of weeks ago said he has zero problem with this legislation and he does not want kids that young being taught about hetero or homo sexual content. He was floored that this was even an issue. I agree with him.
 

phunterd

New member
Aug 1, 2006
2,149
4,788
0
Portraying gay or trans characters in children's media is not grooming any more than portraying straight cis characters is grooming. If you think otherwise, you are a bigot.

No. Protecting young children from homosexual topics and gender confusion in an effort to preserve their innocence as long as possible is not bigoted. It’s what sane parents do.
 
Mar 13, 2004
14,745
12,925
0
How do you say you’re a pedophile without saying you’re a pedophile…
There's something wrong with your mind if you're thinking about having sex with children and wanting to talk about having sex with children. Showing two men who are a couple is no more sexual than showing a man and woman as a couple, and neither has anything to do with having sex with children, but your mind goes to having sex with children. Get your sick, twisted mind out of the gutter and stop thinking about diddling kids you pervert.
 

80 Proof

Well-known member
Jan 3, 2003
64,596
51,203
113
No. Protecting young children from homosexual topics and gender confusion in an effort to preserve their innocence as long as possible is not bigoted. It’s what sane parents do.
It's not just homosexual topics that I think need to be avoided here. Kids at that age don't need to be taught any sort if sexual material unless by their parents.
 

Bigblue2023

New member
Jun 22, 2019
2,236
6,984
0
As opposed to legislate compliance. Don't Say Gay caveman because that would be illegal down there!

Yea, the bill doesn’t even mention the word “gay” you complete and total moron. Also, no, you shouldn’t be talking to kindergartners about sexual preference of any kind. Straight, gay, trans, or any other made up word you lefties use these days.

Children are not sexual beings and also dont have the emotional or mental capacity to understand and process such complex issues. They need to stick with the normal things, like trying to color between the lines…because they’re f&cking children.

People like you attempting to sexualize children in order to make you feel better about being you is sick and disgusting. Go do your own thing in the privacy of your own home with another consenting ADULT, and leave the kids out of it.

I can’t help but believe there is a deep and dark underlying issue with people like you who try so hard to sexualize children. I know my pedo comment came off as a bit of a joke, but I’m not laughing and I’m not at all convinced I’m wrong calling you that.
 
Last edited:

JumperJack

New member
Oct 30, 2002
21,997
65,619
0
Portraying gay or trans characters in children's media is not grooming any more than portraying straight cis characters is grooming. If you think otherwise, you are a bigot.
I get what you’re saying. People have to learn at some point that not everybody’s the same.

But especially for young children, this is the place of the parent, not the school, or media.
 

Ryan Lemonds Hair

Well-known member
May 31, 2018
15,257
30,633
98
Zzz. Big surprise that you’re all for this and call someone a bigot. Heterosexuality is natural. Your existence is a result of such a thing. Kids aren't confused by a mom and a dad on a show. Despite what your TV tells you, half the population isn't gay nor are they trans.

Your use of “cis” is a dead giveaway of how brainwashed you are. We all knew it because of the covid thread that you're a far left nut so it was no surprise how you're all about wanting to talk about gay sex or sex in general to kids.

I suggest you don't stop there. You should mention your pronouns in every post as a way to not offend someone. Perhaps a Ukrainian flag or an "I'm vaccinated" profile pic filter as well.
They are totally against using common terms such as him, her, he and she because that might be offensive but are totally okay with derogatory terms that could be offensive like bigot, chauvinist. racist, etc. It apparently is only offensive if they deem it as such.
 

Bigblue2023

New member
Jun 22, 2019
2,236
6,984
0
There's something wrong with your mind if you're thinking about having sex with children and wanting to talk about having sex with children. Showing two men who are a couple is no more sexual than showing a man and woman as a couple, and neither has anything to do with having sex with children, but your mind goes to having sex with children. Get your sick, twisted mind out of the gutter and stop thinking about diddling kids you pervert.
I thought I was responding to you with my previous post, but it still applies to James, so I’ll leave it there and you can look back.

Youre demanding the sexualization of children and then calling others a pervert? You’re sick and honestly too stupid to even try to convince. Go seek help you twisted f&ck.
 
Mar 13, 2004
14,745
12,925
0
I thought I was responding to you with my previous post, but it still applies to James, so I’ll leave it there and you can look back.

Youre demanding the sexualization of children and then calling others a pervert? You’re sick and honestly too stupid to even try to convince. Go seek help you twisted f&ck.
I demand no such thing. Nobody is talking or thinking about sexualizing children except you. You're clearly depraved and sick. Putting you on ignore, I don't engage with people who think about and talk about sex with children.
 
Mar 13, 2004
14,745
12,925
0
I get what you’re saying. People have to learn at some point that not everybody’s the same.

But especially for young children, this is the place of the parent, not the school, or media.
Hard disagree. If parents want their kids to view gay people as lesser, or othered, that's on them to teach their kids. Schools and media shouldn't be censored from portraying people as they exist just because some people are bigot who think there's something wrong or dirty or "confusing" about two men or two women being a couple. Gay kids exist. Kids with gay parents exist. Straight kids of straight parents will go to school with these kids, interact with them in the real world. We shouldn't censor our media and schools just because some people are bigoted toward gay people.
 
  • Like
Reactions: catburglar

Beatle Bum

Well-known member
Sep 1, 2002
39,235
57,842
113
It's not just homosexual topics that I think need to be avoided here. Kids at that age don't need to be taught any sort if sexual material unless by their parents.
The legislation does not mention homosexual topics and would address a teacher teaching heterosexual intimacy to kindergartners.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lost In FL

Beatle Bum

Well-known member
Sep 1, 2002
39,235
57,842
113
But especially for young children, this is the place of the parent, not the school, or media.
Yeah. Not a hard concept to understand. Teach reading, writing, math, hard science and how to learn on your own. We don’t need kids learning about sex and gender issues at such a young age. Let parents parent. Some teachers get very defensive about their role as teachers and not as the parents of their classes.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.