Don't look now, but Tee Martin has his O and QB rolling...

Feb 21, 2006
8,403
9,162
0
There was some doubt about USC and the trajectory of Tee's career path, not anymore...trojans are on their way to winning out and ole tee is going to be pinging on the radar again...

His offense is full steam ahead and his freshman QB will be in heisman and top QB in draft discussions the next couple seasons...

Also, a lot of that talent is Sark's doing. I'd make a phone call this off season to gauge his interest in coming aboard to be a top offensive assistant/pass game coordinator/wrs type of role. Our QB and WRs could use a make over and kick in the pants...it won't be long before Sark starts to climb up the ranks and make some noise again, kind of like Kiffin...
 

UKWildcats#8

All-American
Jun 25, 2011
30,327
9,337
0
USC may or may not win out. They will have to go to either WSU or Washington for the Pac 12 title game most likely (stupid rules to not have it at a neutral field) and they still have the rivalry game with UCLA, and you never know in a rivalry game.

Danny Kanell was idiotically trying to say last night "idk" who would win if USC played Bama today LOL what a tool.
 

ukalum1988

Heisman
Dec 21, 2014
12,168
31,434
113
There was some doubt about USC and the trajectory of Tee's career path, not anymore...trojans are on their way to winning out and ole tee is going to be pinging on the radar again...

His offense is full steam ahead and his freshman QB will be in heisman and top QB in draft discussions the next couple seasons...

Also, a lot of that talent is Sark's doing. I'd make a phone call this off season to gauge his interest in coming aboard to be a top offensive assistant/pass game coordinator/wrs type of role. Our QB and WRs could use a make over and kick in the pants...it won't be long before Sark starts to climb up the ranks and make some noise again, kind of like Kiffin...
Our problems are primarily on defense not the offensive side of the ball. That where Stoops needs to focus his attention IMO.
 
Feb 21, 2006
8,403
9,162
0
Our problems are primarily on defense not the offensive side of the ball. That where Stoops needs to focus his attention IMO.

Agree.

The D needs to be overhauled, but that doesn't mean you totally pass over opportunities to make your staff better in other areas.

Sark is talent. UK football program could use all the talent it can get.

His finger prints are all over the success USC is having, and he is playing a role in Alabama's success while at the same time improving himself and learning from the best.
 

*Bleedingblue*

Heisman
Mar 5, 2009
39,695
30,598
113
There was some doubt about USC and the trajectory of Tee's career path, not anymore...trojans are on their way to winning out and ole tee is going to be pinging on the radar again...

His offense is full steam ahead and his freshman QB will be in heisman and top QB in draft discussions the next couple seasons...

Also, a lot of that talent is Sark's doing. I'd make a phone call this off season to gauge his interest in coming aboard to be a top offensive assistant/pass game coordinator/wrs type of role. Our QB and WRs could use a make over and kick in the pants...it won't be long before Sark starts to climb up the ranks and make some noise again, kind of like Kiffin...


Many UK fans will not want him because of his history of drinking. Even though Stoops does drink but not an alcoholic like Sark.

It's just like with the Bama OC Kiffin, many on here don't want him because he was fired from USC. How he led a team with only 50 something players to 7 wins and that is just terrible in their eyes. Mean while they are burning couches in the street in our 5 wins over terrible teams.
 
Feb 21, 2006
8,403
9,162
0
Many UK fans will not want him because of his history of drinking. Even though Stoops does drink but not an alcoholic like Sark.

It's just like with the Bama OC Kiffin, many on here don't want him because he was fired from USC. How he led a team with only 50 something players to 7 wins and that is just terrible in their eyes. Mean while they are burning couches in the street in our 5 wins over terrible teams.

I'm not all too concerned with UK fans wanting or not wanting certain coaches and whether or not they can realize talent when they see it.

My concern is with the decision makers of UK and their ability to scout and evaluate talent.

Sark can make this program better, especially if we can get him for a bargain compared to what his value was as a rising coordinator and young HC.

He is one of the better offensive minds in the game, and top recruiter to boot. He needs to be contacted at the very least.
 

bthaunert

Heisman
Apr 4, 2007
29,518
21,619
0
USC may or may not win out. They will have to go to either WSU or Washington for the Pac 12 title game most likely (stupid rules to not have it at a neutral field) and they still have the rivalry game with UCLA, and you never know in a rivalry game.

Danny Kanell was idiotically trying to say last night "idk" who would win if USC played Bama today LOL what a tool.
The PAC12 moved to a neutral field last year after doing home field before.
 

ukalum1988

Heisman
Dec 21, 2014
12,168
31,434
113
Agree.

The D needs to be overhauled, but that doesn't mean you totally pass over opportunities to make your staff better in other areas.

Sark is talent. UK football program could use all the talent it can get.

His finger prints are all over the success USC is having, and he is playing a role in Alabama's success while at the same time improving himself and learning from the best.
I understand where you're coming from, but are you suggesting that he be added to the staff as a position coach (and if so who would you replace?). Or - would you add him as a "back-office" quality control / recruiting coordinator type staff person? In the second case I don't believe he could have contact with recruits.

As to your other point I wouldn't let his previous history stop me from giving him a shot but a zero tolerance policy towards alcohol-related behavior would be in order given his history.
 
Feb 21, 2006
8,403
9,162
0
I understand where you're coming from, but are you suggesting that he be added to the staff as a position coach (and if so who would you replace?). Or - would you add him as a "back-office" quality control / recruiting coordinator type staff person? In the second case I don't believe he could have contact with recruits.

As to your other point I wouldn't let his previous history stop me from giving him a shot but a zero tolerance policy towards alcohol-related behavior would be in order given his history.

I would find room for him. Whatever it takes.

If that means shifting some folks around or bumping someone, so be it.

Call him a "special assistant to the HC" or a "football consultant to the athletic department".

After Bama wins the title again, folks are going to start to forget about his past and his star will start to rise again. I honestly think he may follow kiffin somewhere or will replace him as OC.