Establishing the Running Game

earsky

All-Conference
Jan 12, 2010
11,904
4,199
0
After watching Coach Petrino's presser yesterday,thru his own words, there is not an identity with the running game.

Going forward, I'm not sure if we are a spread offense, which opens up the running, or a power team which lines up behind a huge offensive line and runs behind the center.
 

Senore2006

All-Conference
Nov 20, 2008
3,017
1,387
0
After watching Coach Petrino's presser yesterday,thru his own words, there is not an identity with the running game.

Going forward, I'm not sure if we are a spread offense, which opens up the running, or a power team which lines up behind a huge offensive line and runs behind the center.
Well. there is simply not much data to go on since the last game was played in such catch-up fashion. What we definitely don't want is for the Bama game to be prelude to the same result against Clemson. Or BC or anyone, lol.

Like the fan's tolerance and assessment of Bobby 2.0, the assessment of this team is a process just now unfolding. We tend to be more unforgiving in analysis, if hopeful about results.

Frankly, Trey looked pretty pedestrian the other day but we all realize that may be because of who we played. I cannot come up with any definitive take on our abilities since the last game was such a comparative disaster. Hopefully, like most seasons in our past not named 2016, we will improve game by game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: earsky

Knucklehank1

All-American
Jul 12, 2004
9,750
6,351
0
I think we are going to see more Dae Williams. There were 2 runs I distinctly remember where I thought Trey Smith could’ve broken the initial tackle and picked up good yardage. I like Trey Smith as a change of pace but I think Williams should carry most of the load.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wilkie01 and earsky

earsky

All-Conference
Jan 12, 2010
11,904
4,199
0
I will say that with the speed we tend to see now in the defenses(and not even on the level of Bama) the slow developing plays are going to be tough to execute.
 

earsky

All-Conference
Jan 12, 2010
11,904
4,199
0
Like the fan's tolerance and assessment of Bobby 2.0, the assessment of this team is a process just now unfolding. We tend to be more unforgiving in analysis, if hopeful about results.
And my post is not to slam the coaches or players, but just to discuss what might be the philosophy going forward. It's probably not hard to see where I'm at. With all that beef(can I say that )up front, 3 yards and a cloud of dust is very appealing to me. A lead back and a dive mentality.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Senore2006

Rollem Cards

Heisman
Jul 9, 2001
55,267
13,639
0
CBP mentioned a couple of "questionable" procedure penalties.

I watched the replay and two calls I never did see movement. Even in slo-mo.
 

Knucklehank1

All-American
Jul 12, 2004
9,750
6,351
0
I think we are going to see more Dae Williams. There were 2 runs I distinctly remember where I thought Trey Smith could’ve broken the initial tackle and picked up good yardage. I like Trey Smith as a change of pace but I think Williams should carry most of the load.

We saw more Dae Williams but still not enough. If our offensive line is half as good as Petrino thinks they are, we should be feeding the ball to Dae 15-20 times per game.
 

beantowncard

Heisman
Mar 9, 2009
56,274
25,259
82
I agree. It looks like Dae is the guy when he’s healthy. We have to commit to it. We’ll see.
 
Sep 7, 2004
10,508
242
0
We are a spread team. The offense that Bobby ran during his first tenure, then at Arkansas, and WKU is no more.

In 3 games we have lined up under center and/or power run formation 5 or 6 times. Everything else has been in shotgun with the either to the side of the QB or right behind him.
 

glassmanJ

All-Conference
Jan 26, 2007
2,950
1,597
0
In 3 games we have lined up under center and/or power run formation 5 or 6 times. Everything else has been in shotgun with the either to the side of the QB or right behind him.
with young qb's, especially malik, you'll never see them under center. kids don't know how to take a snap anymore and the deception of hiding the ball is gone. when the defense cannot see where the ball is and if it's been handed off or not it's a huge advantage. when the defense always sees the ball in shotgun, they see the handoff so you can never establish the run game before the passing game. they are not thinking which way the play is going to go. and since young qb's don;t take snaps from center you are forced to get the passing game going first to establish the run. most qb's going into nfl are chided for never having taken snaps under center. teddy took snaps under center as did brohm. but lately qb's coming out of high school never do. old school stuff that doesn't work in the high school spread offense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Williedynamite

nccardfan

All-Conference
Sep 5, 2007
10,750
4,795
0
Was RB Collin Wilson not a factor in this game. Versus Indiana St. he rushed 7 times for 52 yards.
He started. I think he was a casualty of playing with Pass. Only got 2 carries, 3 yards. He did fumble but we didn’t lose possession.
Looks like Cunningham and Dae Williams going forward.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gocds

Thecycle27

All-Conference
Sep 17, 2017
3,867
3,052
0
We are a spread team. The offense that Bobby ran during his first tenure, then at Arkansas, and WKU is no more.

In 3 games we have lined up under center and/or power run formation 5 or 6 times. Everything else has been in shotgun with the either to the side of the QB or right behind him.
There is a significant difference between the spread offense and the Pro style Petrino used to run. The pro style was his offense, now he has completely went into a full spread offense which isn't something he has coached until Lamar showed up. I really don't understand the shift if his offensive philosophy.

You can see it the pro style is a more physical style of football, and his teams since Lamar haven't been physical. He used to run clocks out with the running backs now it is all the QB.

The offense has been extremely inconsistent, who knows what it have looked like without Lamar's talent.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nccardfan
Jan 20, 2011
191,157
13,249
0
I think we are going to see more Dae Williams. There were 2 runs I distinctly remember where I thought Trey Smith could’ve broken the initial tackle and picked up good yardage. I like Trey Smith as a change of pace but I think Williams should carry most of the load.

Williams appears to be the most complete ready to play back in the fold. I like what I've seen out of Hall in limited action also.

It looks like the QB is going to be the leading rusher again though.
 

MikeMcCammon

Senior
Jan 6, 2018
902
513
0
Sadly, 2.0 along that dimwit McGee decided to scrap the traditional Petrino offense and go to a duel threat quarterback system. The only way Petrino is going to salvage his program is move back to the type of offense we ran before and that he ran at Arkansas and take what the defense gives you and force them to constantly adjust. That requires someone with a viable arm and the intelligence to quickly read the defense and make adjustments at the line while moving at a faster pace. We would have a much better chance at success than to attempt to play a game that does not fit here.
 
Sep 7, 2004
10,508
242
0
Bobby going back to his old offense isn’t going to happen. We are now a dual threat spread team. Which is fine...if you know how to recruit to it and run it. Which we don’t.
 
Jan 20, 2011
191,157
13,249
0
Bobby going back to his old offense isn’t going to happen. We are now a dual threat spread team. Which is fine...if you know how to recruit to it and run it. Which we don’t.

What type of WR do you like seeing in the spread O? Wr was supposed to be one of our strengths, so far, not happening. Do you think the system requires smaller more sure handed, less big play types? I really don't know, I'm a novice when you start pulling back layers.
 

BPGhost

All-American
Jun 23, 2015
6,365
7,291
0
Bobby going back to his old offense isn’t going to happen. We are now a dual threat spread team. Which is fine...if you know how to recruit to it and run it. Which we don’t.
Sadly I agree. If Petrino is going to stick with the RPO spread system - he needs to hire an OC / QB coach that has that system as his background and put Nick in charge of the team’s laundry.
 

MikeMcCammon

Senior
Jan 6, 2018
902
513
0
Bobby going back to his old offense isn’t going to happen. We are now a dual threat spread team. Which is fine...if you know how to recruit to it and run it. Which we don’t.
Then he will continue to flounder and eventually be fired. Even with the most dynamic duel threat quarterback in 10 years it didn't really work.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Williedynamite

BPGhost

All-American
Jun 23, 2015
6,365
7,291
0
What type of WR do you like seeing in the spread O? Wr was supposed to be one of our strengths, so far, not happening. Do you think the system requires smaller more sure handed, less big play types? I really don't know, I'm a novice when you start pulling back layers.
The guys that we have are fine but part of what comes with big WRs - and the ones that we can get here - is decreased ability to gain separation. The big problem in my opinion though is the lack of creativity in play calling. Petrino previously was a genius in adapting his playbook to the talent that he had - now he seemingly relies on having a QB who can escape the pocket when his plays break down.
 

MikeMcCammon

Senior
Jan 6, 2018
902
513
0
The guys that we have are fine but part of what comes with big WRs - and the ones that we can get here - is decreased ability to gain separation. The big problem in my opinion though is the lack of creativity in play calling. Petrino previously was a genius in adapting his playbook to the talent that he had - now he seemingly relies on having a QB who can escape the pocket when his plays break down.
And we also had quarterbacks that understood defenses, could make adjustments, and make the right call. Lefors and Brohm were extremely intelligent and could handle anything Petrino 1.0 could throw at them.
 

earsky

All-Conference
Jan 12, 2010
11,904
4,199
0
I think you play the cards you're dealt. Those cards are this huge offensive line. If you don't line up behind center, with a lead back and try to play smash mouth football, what does it tell your O-line about your confidence in them?

How does that line gain any confidence in itself?
 

BPGhost

All-American
Jun 23, 2015
6,365
7,291
0
And we also had quarterbacks that understood defenses, could make adjustments, and make the right call. Lefors and Brohm were extremely intelligent and could handle anything Petrino 1.0 could throw at them.
Another mostly false opinion based on not understanding what you’re looking at. Petrino didn’t throw the same things at SL and BB - because they had completely different skill sets. He tailored his play calling to maximize their strengths and minimize their weaknesses. Had he simply called the same plays - neither would have had the same level of success.
 

MikeMcCammon

Senior
Jan 6, 2018
902
513
0
Another mostly false opinion based on not understanding what you’re looking at. Petrino didn’t throw the same things at SL and BB - because they had completely different skill sets. He tailored his play calling to maximize their strengths and minimize their weaknesses. Had he simply called the same plays - neither would have had the same level of success.
And part of their skill set was a very strong grasp of the game and high intelligence. They were a big reason we could run a complex offense that kept defenses on their heels.
 

BPGhost

All-American
Jun 23, 2015
6,365
7,291
0
And part of their skill set was a very strong grasp of the game and high intelligence. They were a big reason we could run a complex offense that kept defenses on their heels.
Of course they were smart - that’s not the point or, the point of contention. 99% of talented QBs success at every level is driven by the talent surrounding them and, the plays called for them.

It wouldn’t have matter how intelligent either of them were if Petrino called the same plays that he did for LJ. I guess in your world only unintelligent QBs are unsuccessful - lol.
 

MikeMcCammon

Senior
Jan 6, 2018
902
513
0
Of course they were smart - that’s not the point or, the point of contention. 99% of talented QBs success at every level is driven by the talent surrounding them and, the plays called for them.

It wouldn’t have matter how intelligent either of them were if Petrino called the same plays that he did for LJ. I guess in your world only unintelligent QBs are unsuccessful - lol.
You can only run a system that your quarterback is capable of comprehending. We have been limited in that regard since we don't have a Lefors or a Brohm and the sad thing is we no longer even recruit quarterbacks like them.
 

wilkie01

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
12,371
1,335
0
Well, Bobby had better make up his mind soon or an avalanches of loss will be happening very soon.
 

BPGhost

All-American
Jun 23, 2015
6,365
7,291
0
You can only run a system that your quarterback is capable of comprehending. We have been limited in that regard since we don't have a Lefors or a Brohm and the sad thing is we no longer even recruit quarterbacks like them.
Ummm - no offense to Lefors but no P5 programs recruit 5’11” LH QBs who can’t throw the ball 45 yards in the air. While not as highly rated - no SI covers to his credit - Pass is in the Brohm mold - a pocket QB. Only he’s bigger, stronger and faster. Doesn’t look like he’ll be nearly as good but, a lot of that is on Petrino to coach him up and put him in the spots to succeed.

If you know something specific about him not succeeding due to drug use, you should be specific. If not - you should shut the hell up.
 

MikeMcCammon

Senior
Jan 6, 2018
902
513
0
Ummm - no offense to Lefors but no P5 programs recruit 5’11” LH QBs who can’t throw the ball 45 yards in the air. While not as highly rated - no SI covers to his credit - Pass is in the Brohm mold - a pocket QB. Only he’s bigger, stronger and faster. Doesn’t look like he’ll be nearly as good but, a lot of that is on Petrino to coach him up and put him in the spots to succeed.

If you know something specific about him not succeeding due to drug use, you should be specific. If not - you should shut the hell up.
Stefan was 6'1 and had the most accurate arm of any quarterback we ever had. He was not John Elway but adequate in terms of arm strength. The obvious difference between Brohm and Pass is Brohm understood the game more than most college quarterbacks when he arrived here and was very intelligent.
 

BPGhost

All-American
Jun 23, 2015
6,365
7,291
0
Stefan was 6'1 and had the most accurate arm of any quarterback we ever had. He was not John Elway but adequate in terms of arm strength. The obvious difference between Brohm and Pass is Brohm understood the game more than most college quarterbacks when he arrived here and was very intelligent.
Umm no - Lefors might have been listed as 6’1” but was in fact, not. How do I know that? Well I’ve met / spoken with him on multiple occasions and at 6’, I’m taller than he is.

Not that any of that distinction matters. High level P5 teams wouldn’t recruit SL to be their starting QB of the future even if he was 6’1”. Petrino saw something in him and tailor made an offensive game plan to make him successful.
 

MikeMcCammon

Senior
Jan 6, 2018
902
513
0
Petrino saw something in him and tailor made an offensive game plan to make him successful.
Which he has done for every quarterback that played for him including Cantwell until he came back here. What happened to that system? Now he creates systems that don't fit the personnel he has. Just another aspect of the failure of 2.0.
 

BPGhost

All-American
Jun 23, 2015
6,365
7,291
0
Which he has done for every quarterback that played for him including Cantwell until he came back here. What happened to that system? Now he creates systems that don't fit the personnel he has. Just another aspect of the failure of 2.0.
I’ve been saying for four years that Petrino’s ineffectiveness - relative to his last stint - is due in equal parts to his decline as an offensive innovator and defenses catching up to his system.

Who do you think recruited LJ and told him that he could play QB here - instead of WR like other high P5 programs wanted him to? Did LJ fit his 1.0 offense? No - not in the slightest. You could make the argument that Petrino has been moving away from that offense since he agreed to go coach Michael Vick with the Falcons.

I think it’sthe problem now. He’s caught between the two schemes. Defenses have caught up to his old system and, he doesn’t have the feel for the RPO offense - and maybe never will.
 

MikeMcCammon

Senior
Jan 6, 2018
902
513
0
I’ve been saying for four years that Petrino’s ineffectiveness - relative to his last stint - is due in equal parts to his decline as an offensive innovator and defenses catching up to his system.

Who do you think recruited LJ and told him that he could play QB here - instead of WR like other high P5 programs wanted him to? Did LJ fit his 1.0 offense? No - not in the slightest. You could make the argument that Petrino has been moving away from that offense since he agreed to go coach Michael Vick with the Falcons.

I think it’sthe problem now. He’s caught between the two schemes. Defenses have caught up to his old system and, he doesn’t have the feel for the RPO offense - and maybe never will.
I never saw any evidence that defenses caught up with his old system. He was doing quite well at Arkansas and even WKU with it. Will Gardner was just a so so quarterback and the old system seemed to work pretty well even with him before he got hurt. McGee apparently had a lot to do with the change in mentality. Then Petrino swerved into LJ and was sold on it even after questionable results with Bonnafon. What do you think the chances of finding another LJ are? As good as LJ was as a runner and occasionally as a passer I still never thought the offense was consistent and effective, even with him. The running game outside of LJ was not effective. Also, using that type of offense has apparently eroded his entire offensive system.
 
Sep 7, 2004
10,508
242
0
The WR are just fine. Good size and speed. Just need to concentrate more. What we need are smaller faster backs. With most versions of the spread you need a back that can make one cut and go. You need a running back that’s really quick, with good vision. Especially when you’re O-line is zone blocking. The RB has to be able to make cuts and see the hole and get to it quickly.
 

teamcanada

Senior
Aug 27, 2007
925
753
0
Bobby going back to his old offense isn’t going to happen. We are now a dual threat spread team. Which is fine...if you know how to recruit to it and run it. Which we don’t.
He is trying to run that offense with Pass. It doesn't seem to be working very well.